• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

"IF The Big Bang Is True Then How.....?"

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
The like-to-dislike ratio on that video is concerning, as are a lot of the top comments on it.

We clearly have a long way to go before intellectual bankruptcy is minimized into a negligible phenomenon in the Information Age.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
What's stupid about it?
Just about everything. I don't think he got one thing right in that video.

When one does not understand what one is debating against it is a very stupid techniques to demonstrate that one does not have the first clue about the science that he or she hates.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
One point, that video is rather old, but Kent has not learned anything since that time. He still uses the same old tired arguments. I have been watching some debates of his recently and The Stupid is so strong with him that it makes them painful to watch.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Doctor Kent if you would please.


kent hovind thesis.png


source
.
 
Last edited:

leroy

Well-Known Member
I personally find it very funny that “evolutionists” , agnostics, atheist etc. tend to defend the Big Bang theory with passion and favor when they are talking to YEC, but later they reject, or become skeptic of the BB when they are commenting on the Kalam Comsmological argument.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I personally find it very funny that “evolutionists” , agnostics, atheist etc. tend to defend the Big Bang theory with passion and favor when they are talking to YEC, but later they reject, or become skeptic of the BB when they are commenting on the Kalam Comsmological argument.
When have they ever done that? Perhaps you do not understand either the BB or the Kalam.
 

leroy

Well-Known Member
When have they ever done that? Perhaps you do not understand either the BB or the Kalam.
So do you accept that the universe (all space time and everything in it) began to exist 13+ billion years ago at the Bing Bang?
 
Last edited:
Top