How do you know what I read? You like to claim things that you have no way of knowing are true or not.II went to bed, it was after 2AM. You know I do sleep.
Trilobites arrive suddenly in the record, w/ fully developed, compound eye lenses. Hundreds (thousands?) of species of them, all appear abruptly within that 10-15 m.y. timeframe of the radiation. Trilobites are just one group...there are between 20 and 32 different, modern animal phyla represented, including brachiopods and arthropods, that first arrive in the Cambrian.
And although life appears in the fossil record eons before that, it’s unicellular forms; then, in the Ediacaran, there appears multicellular life....but nothing that would indicate ancestral forms to many of those in the Cambrian.
(I’ve posted answers similar to this before....you never read them?)
The information is online, for all to find.
(And I’ll respond when I can. You’re not not at my beck-and-call... neither am I to yours.)
Since you acknowledge the existence of living things prior to the Cambrian and offer only gaps as evidence, it is not clear that the Cambrian fauna did not evolve.
I know you post lots of gap arguments, but thank you for confirming that.
No mention here about apoptosis or sexual selection. Let me guess, like the Cambrian fauna, if science does not have complete answers for everything relating to a theory, then the theory is wrong and creationism takes over by default. It doesn't work that way. Even ig the theory of evolution was found wanting based on some evidence, the creation according to Genesis has already been eliminated and cannot be the default replacement. All Your efforts to discredit science will avail you nothing.
Last edited: