I'm not heavy into sarcasm. I have language issues but I try to get around them with proper discussion and huge clarification. So, if that's what you need, please ask directly. Post #22 has the point. Some of you got it, others did not. So, it depends on the person and what he or she interprets it.
Probably because it is sarcasm given the OP wants specifics without offering up any details that even a child would notice, not to mention someone with any training or experience....
It's not specific to that whether the child is in danger and what would you do. It says what brought you to the conclusion If you thought the child was in danger based on what you saw but never witnessed.
It's "what is your logic" question not what you would do. Most people would call the police, defend the child, whatever the case may be. No investigation needed. Of course, that's the ideal decision but this isn't a decision based question but a thought based: what brought you to that conclusion.
Other posts give or take got it, so you can look through those too.
Yes.
I can not answer for myself because I am not a believer.
I can not answer for any one else because I suspect that each person has their own thought process which is saturated with bias, prejudice, etc. based upon each individuals experiences.
Have you hypothesized in someone else's shoes before?
Most likely. I hypothsize a lot so asking questions from another point of view is pretty much part of how I see life. If I personally only interpret things from my perspective, well....
I most likely would if I had any idea what your point might be.
Ask. Communication comes with clarification. Unless it's a math problem, I'm sure not all OPs are point blank. If they were, religiousforums, would probably not exist.
You are going to have to be more specific.
I don't know now. The whole time it wasn't conversation but more attacking the question and sarcasm around it. If I was more specific, would you drop the sarcasm?
Can't use instinct, reflex, training, etc. as "justification" for actions that would be, at least at first, training, reflex, instinct, etc.?
Well, since this isn't about what you would do, I would say those are irrelevant.
since I am failing to make any connection between your detail free scenario and god....
Thanks for saying that without sarcasm. I finally put it together on #22.