I did. On thinking about it, it may not be the answer to the ultimate question, but it is a great answer to one question. Now what was that question? Hmm. It's right on the top of my tongue. I'll think of it.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Beer would fix that. I believe there is a glass on the thread. You can use that.
Howard Is
Lucky Mud
Yeah, but I need an empty glass. That one is full of nothing.
And how, precisely, do you exclude EMR? Along with all the other quantum particles will be photons, produced by those quantum fluctuations.
If so, you need to develop your imaginations a bit more. try doing some math. It will help with that and show the possibilities are much, much more than you might think.
Which is also impossible, although only physically so.
Skwim
Veteran Member
What if the glass is made of a special material that doesn't exist? A miracle material that is absolutely impenetrable to all things. I only mention this since discussion has jumped to =miracle.
What you reckon that glass could keep a beer frosty cold for extra long?
If it will hold a pint of nothing we are in business.
It is not impossible to empty our glass completely , we only have to rewind time and reverse engineer until not even the glass exists .
The space would still exist and be immovable . If you move the glass the space doesn't move with the glass .
rational experiences
Veteran Member
If males invented science and in scientific minds concluded that space is a deep empty pit, they also knew that space cannot be measured.
If science as a mind says I know everything, then where is your measure of space, which would claim absolute knowledge of depth of space versus all presence of cold mass.
For if creation does not yet exist, where a male places a mind to say I have to form a thought to put a space as emptiness first to then put mass/creation in that space to fill it up. When space as a body is already absolute by what it owns and what it does not own.
Science proves in thinking that all it concluded was how to shift mass by use of spaces. Therefore said to shift mass the space has to be hot, to take cold from being held fused....for shifting.
If science as a mind says I know everything, then where is your measure of space, which would claim absolute knowledge of depth of space versus all presence of cold mass.
For if creation does not yet exist, where a male places a mind to say I have to form a thought to put a space as emptiness first to then put mass/creation in that space to fill it up. When space as a body is already absolute by what it owns and what it does not own.
Science proves in thinking that all it concluded was how to shift mass by use of spaces. Therefore said to shift mass the space has to be hot, to take cold from being held fused....for shifting.
The specifics of absolute oblivion space are simple
(T) temperature = 0
Note : kelvins etc did not exist , it is just 0 .
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
My imagination must be more powerful than yours. It just removed the space.
rational experiences
Veteran Member
Science in absolute theory says that it knows what a hot dense state is, when it exists in a oblivion space as absolute and whole together.
Which would exert the information in research to state oblivion supports the numbering by presence of stated mass, and therefore numbering is already owned by that mass.
Mass, would not exist if it did not own a self cooling support.
Numbering in a sequence is inferred by males in science to be adding onto....when absolute already exists without any addition.
Which would state to a male you infer that you knew by a calculation what mass was, and what mass would be a number when you removed it. Which he says was absolute and zero.
Why he then introduced what he said was a minus condition of a non existence of previous natural mass and numbers....which is a human self identified realization, because I destroyed it.
Why he also said, so I realized that for space to allow for destruction, then original form came from a body that could not be space...for space supports the destroyed mass.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Sorry, no. Empty space would be empty space, NOT nothing. Nothing does not nor has it ever exited anywhere other than as an intellectual concept that people can imagine.
QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
You removed it in your imagination... but not in reality.
What is empty space made of ?
Now bare in mind we've imagined away the quanta and the space is absolutely empty .
The space can't be imagined away !
Now wouldn't you say and agree that the space was made of no thing , in affect made of nothing ?
At some point, we have to learn to simply ignore nonsense. Such a tremendous waste of effort and intellect trying to argue with people who can't think clearly in the first place.
rational experiences
Veteran Member
Nothing is an ideal that says what exists can be removed to not exist.
For a human does not exist in any condition of nothing....we exist with everything.
Therefore when a human discusses nothing, they mean it, as a thought...to gain it.
Which implies destruction comes about and change comes about by the thought of nothing.
For as said for a thinking mind to say that it can shift mass in a want of human science, the mind first places a thought to own space, to a mind it is nothing.
Then within the nothing he would idealise the shifting of mass that would be a destruction action.
Human conscious awareness thought those thoughts whilst living inside of a gas massed body, that owned space, gas space. Mass as a gas plus radiation but an ability to move through the mass by the state of gas existence.
Which is a self bio owned status that does not belong to any other form of mass.
Radiation metal advised the seeking science mind that it came into the gas body from outside of it, so outside mass could invade the space of a gas....where his science ideas came from.
Consciousness therefore idealized space inside of a gas mass...which is not relative to space itself.
Well, it may be possible to remove it in reality but at this time that is not really the physics I'd like to discuss .
We can remove the air and light from the glass in reality but with our imagination we can imagine a force field around the glass that prevents wave energy entering the glass and also we can imagine the volume pre - big bang before CBMR even existed .
I'd say it was a little more than imagination as we are envisioning an empty pre-big bang space , nothing exists but the empty space .
rational experiences
Veteran Member
You should think, if a human did not exist, then nor would science, as a true and 100 per cent correct self realization.
If a male infers that out of space created him, then he would also be implying that if he personally began in space.....when he is inferring to gas space.....then he would be trying to put self back into space, which is to remove gas space...so he could gain what he says is his owned absolute theory....as to be owned by a human, living as a human, thinking as a human, for that human status.
Why ownership of trying to give self the states that are natural in their owned natural forms is why human science destroys life on Earth...by trying to give the human wanting what they conceptualize its actuality.