Notanumber
A Free Man
Debunking the "Simple Physics" Slogan About Climate Change : climateskeptics
or is time she went back to school?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Debunking the "Simple Physics" Slogan About Climate Change : climateskeptics
or is time she went back to school?
I am not likely to watch a vid that falsely brings Einsteon into it
I am not likely to watch a vid that falsely brings Einsteon into it
Evolution differs in that there is no alternative explanation.I am aware that nothing in science has 100%.
You could say the same about the theory of evolution.
In fact, many a science denier creationist does just that.
As for your video, I very seldom will watch them. A tell (like Einstein)
that is shown before it even starts will particularly make sure I dont
look.
GW does have alternative causes to consider.
I didn't see the video.Solar activity was considered and rejected, so were change in the Earth's orbit and volcanic activities. Man made global warming due to carbon dioxyde polution is the only theory that can explain the current level of global warming and has actual evidence to back it up.
As for the OP, if he thinks that a 20 minutes video on Youtube is such a revolutionnary leap in our understanding of climate, maybe he should ask the producer to publish his findings in a scientific paper and collect his Nobel prize.
Solar activity was considered and rejected, so were change in the Earth's orbit and volcanic activities. Man made global warming due to carbon dioxyde polution is the only theory that can explain the current level of global warming and has actual evidence to back it up.
As for the OP, if he thinks that a 20 minutes video on Youtube is such a revolutionnary leap in our understanding of climate, maybe he should ask the producer to publish his findings in a scientific paper and collect his Nobel prize.
Ya, let some "men" pile on a 16 year-old girl with a form of autism who happens to accept what the vast majority of climate scientists around the world now say is clearly happening. Ya, she's clearly a global threat to their masculinity.
... which leads to a reddit page with no content but a link to the YouTube video.There is a link underneath for those averse to videos, even short ones.
Ya, she's clearly a global threat to their masculinity.
WOW! What a surprise, a Reddit thread called Climate Skeptics posts anti Climate Change propaganda - next think you know oil company chairman will be saying the same.
Debunking the "Simple Physics" Slogan About Climate Change : climateskeptics
or is time she went back to school?
The OP has made it very clear that his attack was against Greta."How dare you criticize or question this young girl" it's a farce, the men behind the facade is what they are actually railing against, Greta is just the public face.
If she was talking rubbish there would be no fight back from rich white men and the Murdoch media. But they are scared of her, that's why they attack her personally.I think it has a lot more to do with the fact she was basically groomed, promoted, and passed off as some maverick child when the reality is that very wealthy and influential people with interests in green technology cultivated and backed her for their own interests. It's not Greta they dislike, it's the fakery and manipulations behind her.
"How dare you criticize or question this young girl" it's a farce, the men behind the facade is what they are actually railing against, Greta is just the public face.
I am aware that nothing in science has 100%.
You could say the same about the theory of evolution.
In fact, many a science denier creationist does just that.
As for your video, I very seldom will watch them. A tell (like Einstein)
that is shown before it even starts will particularly make sure I dont
look.
What evidence do you have of this?I think it has a lot more to do with the fact she was basically groomed, promoted, and passed off as some maverick child when the reality is that very wealthy and influential people with interests in green technology cultivated and backed her for their own interests.
The OP has made it very clear that his attack was against Greta.
The OP has made it very clear that his attack was against Greta.
If she was talking rubbish there would be no fight back from rich white men and the Murdoch media. But they are scared of her, that's why they attack her personally.