• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Evolution My ToE

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Will he review this? Will he understand it? Even if the answer to both is yes, will it be objectively reviewed? Will it be weighed against what he knows and believes critically and without bias?

It will be denied outright without examination and the lie that no evidence is presented will be repeated.
Let me answer your questions one at a time. No. No. No. And no. I put minimal effort into that post since he will put even less in denying it.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
I understand that you think of your all powerful god as a little child who cannot protect itself, thus the reason YOU are here ranting about insults...
He believes he knows what God thinks and that his every word is God speaking through him.

We do not get to pick the quality of the ignorance that is flung in denial of reallity, nor the quality of the flingers.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Delusional.

It was already explained that if man and most animals could not leave remains, the fossil record would be useless almost.



Nothing existed then on earth. Why do you ask?



Your declaration is noted. Touching.

Try to remember your quest here, stop pretending you have evidence when you have none at all. No matter how hopeless it seems, remember.
Oh dad, all of your insults apply to only you. And I just posted a link to a massive amount of evidence. You keep bearing false witness against your neighbor. You do realize that that is breaking one of your Commandments, don't you?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Claiming the mother of Jesus did not fulfill prophesy and got pregnant some other way is insulting God.
What?!? Now that is about the most insane claim that I have ever heard.

You are trying to tell God how he had to get Jesus here. You seem to think that some strange "god magic" was involved. You are in effect limiting your God. Now that is blasphemy.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
What?!? Now that is about the most insane claim that I have ever heard.

You are trying to tell God how he had to get Jesus here. You seem to think that some strange "god magic" was involved. You are in effect limiting your God. Now that is blasphemy.
What will the lurkers think? Oh my!
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Nor is there any evidence man came from animals. None at all.
That is correct. And then I found out, upon asking questions HERE of the stauch advocates of evolution, that although men say we came from "apes," there is absolutely no evidence of that -- and -- there is a "missing link" of the more or less precise relative. They say. (lol)
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I was thinking of a situation where someone said to a person they were conversing with, "Give me a leaf."
A child in earshot heard, and excitedly exclaimed, "I'll get you one."
Runs into the house, returns and drops this "leaf" in the person's hand.
If the person says to the child, "This is not a leaf." The child will sincerely claim, "But it is a leaf. You asked for a leaf, and I gave you a leaf."
Ceramic
Banana-leaf-shape-leaf-dish-ceramic-dishes-ice-crack-glaze-lovely-sushi-dishes-tableware-small-plate.jpg_640x640q70.jpg


They sincerely believe it is evidence. That is why they believe.
Yes, exactly. Perhaps in time some will open up their eyes. (Metaphorically speaking, of course.)
 

YoursTrue

Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
I'm sure you are not going to get any response to this. Facts are ignored. They don't mind responding to statements... even if they are facts, but data... No way.
I notice that, too. When I asked for evidence of evolution, I got -- charts, and opinions of scientists, declaring the unseen evolution of dna somehow transforming into different forms. Then when I asked questions, I got more charts about dna perhaps and again, opinions of men, but no solid evidence. And then that is declared as evidence. So people really do believe what they have been taught or want to accept (or believe).
 

Astrophile

Active Member
Modern genetics likely started post flood. Obviously that has little to do with origins.
If man and MOST animals on earth, and most plants also, by the way, could not leave remains such as fossil remains, then any succession in the few creatures that could leave remains in that record is anything BUT a record of life on earth as a whole!
The continents likely separated after the time of Babel, and the nature change. It is expected that they were all on the same supercontinent, including man. This is just a misreading of the evidence on your part.

These arguments beg the question and are ad hoc attempts to explain the evidence.

There is no evidence for a world-wide flood; the Genesis flood was probably a local flood (one of many in recorded history) in the valleys of the Tigris and Euphrates). If you think that 'man and MOST animals on earth, and most plants also, ... could not leave ... fossil remains', you should present some evidence. The story of the 'confusion of tongues' at the time of the Tower of Babel is pseudo-history; there were separate languages long before the foundation of Babylon, and the idea that the Earth's continents were first divided in historical time is geologically and physically impossible.
 

Astrophile

Active Member
That is correct. And then I found out, upon asking questions HERE of the stauch advocates of evolution, that although men say we came from "apes," there is absolutely no evidence of that -- and -- there is a "missing link" of the more or less precise relative. They say. (lol)

Where is the 'missing link' in this sequence of fossil hominins?
Fossil_homs_cranial_capacity_vs_time_0[1].png
 

dad

Undefeated
I understand that you think of your all powerful god as a little child who cannot protect itself, thus the reason YOU are here ranting about insults...
His mom is not someone He wants to see lied about and insulted. You see, not only does that insult her, but prophesy, Scripture, Jesus, and the Spirit.
 

dad

Undefeated
You were the only one that did that. You won't find that in a post by me or anyone else supporting reality.
Too late. You posted already and anyone can go back and read where you said Mary got pregnant some other way than by God, Paul was mentally ill, etc.
 

dad

Undefeated
That is correct. And then I found out, upon asking questions HERE of the stauch advocates of evolution, that although men say we came from "apes," there is absolutely no evidence of that -- and -- there is a "missing link" of the more or less precise relative. They say. (lol)
That skull could be from a post-flood ape. In some cases, it could be from a post-flood man. They have no way to tell. Nor have they thought of the possibility that adapting/evolving in that old world and nature was very fast, unlike the slow evolving that goes on today.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Too late. You posted already and anyone can go back and read where you said Mary got pregnant some other way than by God, Paul was mentally ill, etc.
What was wrong with that? You were the one that called Mary a "ho". No one else made that claim.
 
Top