• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should we legalise having sex with a dog?

Earthtank

Active Member
I hope this is being posted in the right section.


Edited to add: Clip is only 5 mins


My post has nothing to do with religion so, please, lets not inject religion into this rather, I would like to focus on basic human values.

I don’t care whether you’re a theist, atheist or anything in between but, how brain damaged do you have to be to actually not be able to say its wrong to have sex with a dog? I am sorry to say but, this man (Lars Gule) having the abbreviation of Dr. in font of his name is a disgrace. How is it that a person can be “in favor of animal rights” yet, seemingly, be OK with having sex with a dog? It doesn’t matter whether you want to call it morality, guidance, religion, human “truth” or whatever. Under no imaginable, real world scenario would it nor should it ever be OK to have sex with a dog.

There full debate is titled “Does traditional Islam need to be Liberalized” if anyone wanted to watch the full thing.
 
Last edited:

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Under no imaginable, real world scenario would it nor should it ever be OK to have sex with a dog.
I'm not the tiniest bit interested in a video about bestiality. The icky factor is too strong.

But having said that, I am looking for objective reasons to hold an opinion on this subject. There are some big problems with irresponsible sex.
One is pregnancy. That's not an issue here.
Another is STDs, that's not really an issue here.
A huge one is the psychological damage. That's not going to happen here.

Physical damage could be done, and I'm very much opposed to that. This despite the fact that I'm planning to go buy meat at the grocery store.

So, the bottom line is I don't care enough about bestiality to even think about it. But it does serve to illustrate the objective morals involved with sex.
Tom
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
We get this kind of thing from time to time whether it's someone putting out the idea of legalizing necrophilia, pedophilia, cannibalism, or beastiality.
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
I'd like to know how one obtains their permission. :rolleyes: No permission, must be rape.

I guess if they hump your leg- it's on!
Dog-humping-leg-ad.jpg
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
I hope this is being posted in the right section.


Edited to add: Clip is only 5 mins


My post has nothing to do with religion so, please, lets not inject religion into this rather, I would like to focus on basic human values.

I don’t care whether you’re a theist, atheist or anything in between but, how brain damaged do you have to be to actually not be able to say its wrong to have sex with a dog? I am sorry to say but, this man (Lars Gule) having the abbreviation of Dr. in font of his name is a disgrace. How is it that a person can be “in favor of animal rights” yet, seemingly, be OK with having sex with a dog? It doesn’t matter whether you want to call it morality, guidance, religion, human “truth” or whatever. Under no imaginable, real world scenario would it nor should it ever be OK to have sex with a dog.

There full debate is titled “Does traditional Islam need to be Liberalized” if anyone wanted to watch the full thing.

I suspect it's a question only those who are interested in having sex with dogs would care about. While I don't want to see folks doing dogs in the street, what they do in the privacy of their home, as long as the animal isn't under duress of course. :shrug:
 

Earthtank

Active Member
I'm not the tiniest bit interested in a video about bestiality

It's not really about bestiality, its more about how the liberal Atheist in this video and debate goes about trying to answer that question. I am not saying that all liberals share his view, in fact, i know they do not.
 

Earthtank

Active Member
We get this kind of thing from time to time whether it's someone putting out the idea of legalizing necrophilia, pedophilia, cannibalism, or beastiality.

Just FYI, i no way am i advocating for bestiality :D. More than anything, i wanted to point out how brain damaged that guy's response was.
 

Stanyon

WWMRD?
Just FYI, i no way am i advocating for bestiality :D. More than anything, i wanted to point out how brain damaged that guy's response was.

I didn't think you were, it's interesting though how people can justify just about anything, NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) comes to mind.
 

Earthtank

Active Member
So you realize that would be a form of animal abuse. Now you know why it is illegal.

I think you might have misunderstood my stance and possibly did not watch the video. I am against sex with any and all animals and agree it would be 100% animal abuse. And yes, i know why its illegal and agree it should be illegal. Not sure where or how you might have gotten confused.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I think you might have misunderstood my stance and possibly did not watch the video. I am against sex with any and all animals and agree it would be 100% animal abuse. And yes, i know why its illegal and agree it should be illegal. Not sure where or how you might have gotten confused.
I apologize. Usually I read entire posts but I did not do so in this case. I made the gross error of assuming that you were supporting this sort of behavior:oops:
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
I didn't think you were, it's interesting though how people can justify just about anything, NAMBLA (North American Man/Boy Love Association) comes to mind.
Religious people(around here they're mostly Christian) regularly justify psychological abuse of children with "The Bible says...."

Happens all the time.
Tom

P.s.
Maybe it's just me. But I haven't noticed anything from NAMBLA since the RCC got slammed by the rest of society.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Now I do have a huge problem with the person trying to refute the person advocating animal sex. He is calling this a concept form "white men" and "liberals". He is a bit of a racist. I have never seen a liberal advocate for animal sex. I have never seen a conservative advocate for animal sex either. This is neither a liberal or a conservative issue. Nor is race a part of it. If he thinks that only white men abuse animals then he is sadly mistaken.
 
Top