Carefully read and understand what you just wrote...
"God-inspired scripture was written by fallible men";"fallible men then interpreted that scripture".
Yes, that refers to the Bible.
Yet, somehow, you put utter faith, trust, and belief into the writings of the fallible man...Ballulah.
Baha’u’llah was not a fallible man. He was a Manifestation of God so He was infallible.
Yet, somehow, you put utter faith, trust, and belief into the interpretations of the fallible men...Shogi Effendi and yourselves.
Shoghi Effendi was a fallible man, but he was entrusted to interpret Baha’u’llah’s Writings by virtue of the Covenant of Baha’u’llah.
That really doesn't make very much sense.
If you realize that men writing holy words are fallible, why would you believe any of it?
If you realize that men reading and interpreting holy words are fallible, why would you believe any of it?
I take the Bible with a grain of salt, I do not believe it the same way I believe what Baha’u’llah wrote. I thought we had been down this road before.
From Letters Written on Behalf of the Guardian:
When 'Abdu'l-Bahá states we believe what is in the Bible, He means in substance. Not that we believe every word of it to be taken literally or that every word is the authentic saying of the Prophet.
(11 February 1944 to an individual believer)
We cannot be sure of the authenticity of any of the phrases in the Old or the New Testament. What we can be sure of is when such references or words are cited or quoted in either the Quran or the Bahá'í writings.
(4 July 1947 to an individual believer)
From letters written on behalf of the Universal House of Justice:
In studying the Bible Bahá'ís must bear two principles in mind. The first is that many passages in Sacred Scriptures are intended to be taken metaphorically, not literally, and some of the paradoxes and apparent contradictions which appear are intended to indicate this. The second is the fact that the text of the early Scriptures, such as the Bible, is not wholly authentic.
(28 May 1984 to an individual believer)
The Bahá'ís believe that God's Revelation is under His care and protection and that the essence, or essential elements, of what His Manifestations intended to convey has been recorded and preserved in Their Holy Books. However, as the sayings of the ancient Prophets were written down some time later, we cannot categorically state, as we do in the case of the Writings of Bahá'u'lláh, that the words and phrases attributed to Them are Their exact words
(9 August 1984 to an individual believer)
The Bible
You put so much faith and trust into the writings and interpretations that you don't even question them. This isn't some mundane subject like whether or not King Arthur was real. This is about GOD and ETERNITY. Yet, somehow you think you have it right.
I
know I have it right, if I go strictly by what Bahaullah wrote, because that is as close to the Word of God as humanity can get. In fact, it is the SAME as if God said it Himself. Belief in Divine unity means that the Will of the Manifestations of God are exactly the same as the Will of God.
“The essence of belief in Divine unity consisteth in regarding Him Who is the Manifestation of God and Him Who is the invisible, the inaccessible, the unknowable Essence as one and the same. By this is meant that whatever pertaineth to the former, all His acts and doings, whatever He ordaineth or forbiddeth, should be considered, in all their aspects, and under all circumstances, and without any reservation, as identical with the Will of God Himself. This is the loftiest station to which a true believer in the unity of God can ever hope to attain. Blessed is the man that reacheth this station, and is of them that are steadfast in their belief.”
Gleanings From the Writings of Bahá’u’lláh, p. 167
I consider what Abdu’l-Baha and Shoghi Effendi wrote to be “authoritative” but it is not the Will of God or the Word of God. When Bahaullah said that what Abdul-Baha says is “the very truth” He just mean it is true, but it is subject to error, Imo. Some other Baha’is might disagree with me though.