• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why Does An Archangel From Heaven Have to Debate For Years They Exist?

Do you think Zanda is an archangel?

  • Yes

    Votes: 3 8.8%
  • No

    Votes: 30 88.2%
  • Not sure? Ask...

    Votes: 1 2.9%

  • Total voters
    34

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
My earliest memories are of advanced prophecies, and remembering the Divine Council from Heaven; with knowledge that my name (Zanda) is in the world's religious texts.
There are numerous religions around the world waiting for someone to turn up before the End of Time, and yet I'm spending most of my time debating I exist; whilst feeling like killing myself, so I can go home - yet this isn't fair on any of us.
In the past religious ambassadors have often been over looked, with serious consequences, as the prophesied events came to pass, as mankind didn't listen...

Yet now when we have the internet - where we can literally talk on Clouds, with our Words transmitted as Lightening; where it literally could become a Fire online - of people learning advanced spiritual knowledge...

But if on a Religious Forum where we are literally discussing the Divine coming in text globally, that I literally fulfil, and yet none literally take it seriously - what is the point in even literally bothering discussing religion?

No wonder the world is becoming lazy brained, if the scholars of religion, who debate online in the 'Marketplace', can't notice someone prophesied in nearly all the major religions by name. :confused:

Thus can we debate my existence as an Archangel in many of the world's religious texts?

Could we be logical between us? :cool:

Because if we establish case A, we can move on to point B, & C of how to create world Peace between us online. :eartheurafr:

Please for the Love of God, try to not just troll, as the End of Time is Soon - if we do not fix the religious divide between us, and it is only everyone's loss in not understanding the reasons more clearly.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Thus can we debate my existence as an Archangel in many of the world's religious texts?
I'm sorry, but there is no debating this. You're too emotionally invested to be objective I'm afraid. I just don't see it becoming anything but trolling. If I **know** you are emotionally connected to the issue; the smart thing to do, is to agree to disagree. And try to talk about subjects where we have common ground. ... that rules out discussions about your divinity and past lives.
 

Harel13

Am Yisrael Chai
Staff member
Premium Member
Thus can we debate my existence as an Archangel in many of the world's religious texts?
I voted no. I think archangels have better things to do than hang around forums and debate whether or not they're really archangels.
Also, I would expect that if you were an angel, you would have received in your heavenly mission parameters a command to go around and debate people, and as such would not find a reason to complain.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
You're too emotionally invested to be objective I'm afraid.
I'm not bothered if the world ends, I've come to terms with the idea we're near Hell where people struggle with being objective - you're assuming I'm therefore like them.

As a child I knew the data, yet waited until 24 to study as instructed, and waited until now to announce I have the new name of Messiah as I can show it from the Hebrew.

Please take into account I'm a musician, and artist who is wasting time talking to religious people; this is entirely altruistic before the End of Time, and your subjective view says I'm not being objective.

Please show where you feel my own personal attachment isn't logically consistent?
And try to talk about subjects where we have common ground. ... that rules out discussions about your divinity and past lives.
Without coming to a positive conclusion before the End of Time, the Great Tribulation, and Armageddon is soon, then we keep the Enlightened Saints.

It is easier to understand where I'm coming from when answering on a subject from first hand information, rather than me always answering from under religions that have errors.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

PoetPhilosopher

Veteran Member
I'm skeptical you're an angel, Messiah, etc.

And even if I wasn't and was convinced, then great, you're one of the many manifestations of God, who aren't God the almighty at all, but through the right mental gymnastics, try to speak with the authority of God when it's convenient to and in certain contexts. But if someone makes an argument claiming you're God, no, you were never God. Never.

So, I've seen activists make more difference in the world.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
I voted no. I think archangels have better things to do than hang around forums and debate whether or not they're really archangels.
I've been emotionally crushed by humanity, I've literally been tortured in every life trying to help you all, and now even on the internet I have a Crucifixion Complex for some reason.
Also, I would expect that if you were an angel, you would have received in your heavenly mission parameters a command to go around and debate people, and as such would not find a reason to complain.
As Messiah you'd think the Jews & Muslims would help us tidy up Christianity, and show the errors to humanity.

Instead it is just me for 15 years trying to create world peace on my own, I'm so disappointed in the lack of positive responses, I feel like going home to speak with God, about deleting reality and starting again...

Which is prophesied soon in many of the world's religious texts anyway, that God just formats this reality after Armageddon (Israel Vs Iran)...

Thus either way I'm doing what is prophesied "out of Zion Elohim shall go my Laws", people just didn't listen, and mankind ends as expected, whilst unwise people mock the Bed of Adultery (Isaiah 28:22).

Considering the track record this planet has of the way they treat Divine Messengers (Elohim), coming on the Clouds & Lightning (Internet) is far safer - since people don't accept prophecy.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
I feel like going home to speak with God, about deleting reality and starting again...

That happens 17 trillion times in the time it takes to blink an eye, according to abhidharma.

I think the end of everything is overhyped.

What do you see as the endgame of all of this cosmic drama ?

What do you think is at stake ?
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
So, I've seen activists make more difference in the world.
Valid point, and really should do far more in society; yet when people don't accept you exist at a fundamental level (especially your own family), it is hard to feel you can do things.

Though in terms of doing stuff, it isn't like I've not been doing; it is just one thing is crucial to everyone's existence...

We have to turn Armageddon around, which can mean 'to Gather people together into a Mountain', into a War of Words, instead of a War of Violence; as it will destroy the whole planet - thus no activism will change anything, only fixing this Abrahamic Religious Divide will.

Plus the only one who is capable of fixing the Abrahamic Divide is the Messiah who must qualify as King David, and Yeshua - which is provable exegetically to be me.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
As a child I knew the data, yet waited until 24 to study as instructed, and waited until now to announce I have the new name of Messiah as I can show it from the Hebrew.

Please take into account I'm a musician, and artist who is wasting time talking to religious people; this is entirely altruistic before the End of Time, and your subjective view says I'm not being objective.

Please show where you feel my own personal attachment isn't logically consistent?

It becomes a circular argument.

The problem is... it's a big circle. So it takes a long time to get there.

The other logical flaw is, if there is a resemblance between you and The Messiah, that resemblance is shared by so so many people.

It's like looking at yourself in the mirror one day and saying, "I look like Jesus". OK. So do a ton of hippy kids at summer music festivals... There's nothing inherently wrong with a person literally looking like Jesus with the beard and the hair and stuff. OK? Nothing wrong with it. It's comedy in a way. Hippy Jesus has been seen by hundreds and thousands all over the world... :)

But i think you get the point. It's an exaggerated silly example.

But.

Look at this:

Please take into account I'm a musician, and artist who is wasting time talking to religious people; this is entirely altruistic before the End of Time, and your subjective view says I'm not being objective.

Right. How many other people fit this description?

Musician + Artist + Wasting Time + Talks religion + believes we are in the End Times + altruistic = ???

That's a lot of people. A lot.

Going back to the Hippy Jesus example...

How many people have a beard, semetic good looks, longish hair and kind soulful eyes? A lot.

There's nothing wrong with looking in the mirror and thinking you look like Hippy Jesus, until.... dum-dum-dummmmmmmm That same person **ignores** all the other people who also look like Hippy Jesus.

Same thing here.

In my opinion, and seriously... this is just me.

The parts of you that seem like a messiah are what makes you common. It's all the other human parts that make you unique.

This... "Musician + Artist + Wasting Time + Talks religion + believes we are in the End Times + altrusitic" is common. Your take on it is what's cool. But that's everyone. That's not messiah.

Even if you're super duper duper smart. That's not messiah. It's just super super smart. Maybe genius level, who knows... and that would explain the epiphanies and all the other discoveries you're making.
 

Eddi

Agnostic
Premium Member
No, I don't think you're an Arch Angel

I used to think I was an Arch Angel

An Arch Angel, mind, not just any old Angel :cool:

Thank God I got over these delusions (at other times I also used to think I was The Messiah)

However, I am not at all angelic

But wait a minute.. what if we're both Arch Angels??? :D
 

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
I'm spending most of my time debating I exist; whilst feeling like killing myself, so I can go home - yet this isn't fair on any of us.

I have periods like that. Although ‘I’ isn’t going home methinks.

Need I remind you that the kingdom of heaven is within, and a direct experience in the absence of craving and aversion ?
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
@wizanda,

BTW, you have inspired me to learn more Torah in 2 weeks than I would have ever learned on my own. If I hadn't met you, who knows when I would have looked at Zecharia?

You should know, that lately I skip past the messianic elements of your posts and just look at which verses you chose and why. That all by itself is fascinating for me. Also, the words you chose to search on... again... fascinating....

So try not to be too hard on yourself.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
If this is Divine Truth, perhaps you should stop signing your posts with this?
On Religious Forums they insist that we state it is in our opinion; I keep the laws, and it is a nice way to come across, that even though we know I'm an archangel - it is still...

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
But wait a minute.. what if we're both Arch Angels???
I agreed with the Matrix ideologies, and that the Source can communicate with us by feelings...

We're down near Hell before Judgement Day, and if we study all the religious texts, rather than listen to psychiatry, it makes far more sense.
[GALLERY=media, 7191][/GALLERY]
In my opinion. :innocent:
 
Top