Again, with the wild assertions and nothing to back them up......where do you get this nonsense?
Why do you keep doing this? Either back up your empty statements or stop making them.
Nimrod was the great grandson of Noah so a gap of 700 years is unlikely...more like a 180 years....he is called...."a mighty hunter before the Lord" (or in opposition to Jehovah".) (Genesis 10:8-12) He led the rebellion after the flood.
His mother was Semiramis who supposedly married her own son. When he was killed, he was deified and many of the Northern Hemisphere mythologies sprang from Nimrod (the dying god) and Mother worship arose from his mother...the basis for Catholicism's "Mother of God".
According to religious tradition, Nimrod was executed for his rebelliousness against Jehovah, the God of Noah. Nimrod’s followers considered his violent death a tragedy or calamity, and deified him. Annually they memorialized his death on the first or second day of the lunar month Tammuz, when the idolatrous women wept over his idol. So among the ancient classical writers he was given the name Bacchus, which means “Bewept One,” “Lamented One.” This weeping over him corresponds with that carried on over the legendary Adonis, a beautiful youth who was loved by Venus or Ishtar and who was killed by a wild boar in the mountains of Lebanon. In fact, the Latin Vulgate Bible and the English Douay Version Bible use the name Adonis instead of Tammuz in
Ezekiel 8:14: “Behold women sat there mourning for Adonis,” or, “Lord.”
Daniel was exiled with many other Jews and taken captive to Babylon. It is nonsense to even suggest that he was never there. Again who said?
"Criticism of the book of Daniel is not new. It started back in the third century C.E. with a philosopher named Porphyry. Like many in the Roman Empire, he felt threatened by the influence of Christianity. He wrote 15 books to undermine this “new” religion. The 12th was directed against the book of Daniel. Porphyry pronounced the book a forgery, written by a Jew in the second century B.C.E. Similar attacks came in the 18th and 19th centuries. In the view of higher critics and rationalists, prophecy—the foretelling of future events—is impossible. Daniel became a favorite target. In effect, he and his book were put on trial in court. Critics claimed to have ample proof that the book was written, not by Daniel during the Jewish exile in Babylon, but by someone else centuries later. Such attacks became so profuse that one author even wrote a defense called
Daniel in the Critics’ Den."
Daniel—A Book on Trial — Watchtower ONLINE LIBRARY