• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Democrats propose temporary measure to avert shutdown

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Days From Shutdown Deadline, Congress Races To Pass Temporary Government Funding Bill

House lawmakers have introduced a temporary funding measure to thwart another government shutdown, with hopes to move the legislation to the Senate and the president's desk before federal agencies run out of money at midnight on Thursday.

The legislative measure, known as a continuing resolution, or CR, will fund the government through Dec. 20. This would mark the second continuing resolution to take effect since the fiscal year began Oct. 1.

The move comes days after the chairs of Senate and House Appropriations committees met with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin also attended the Capitol Hill meeting Thursday, with Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., the chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee, and Rep. Nita Lowey, D-N.Y., chairwoman of the House Appropriations Committee.

This would keep the government open another month. The current deadline is Thursday, so they have to pass something quickly, or else the government might shut down.

Last time, it was closed for 35 days, the longest shutdown in history.
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
Time after time Congress cannot simply adopt a budget., Stupid.
Congress is supposed to be able to stop the government on a dime, but because so many things depend on the federal government the standoffs aren't effective. They always come up with temporary measures.
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
You expect a balanced budget from unbalanced congressmen?

I move to fund the government Monday through Friday and to leave the weekends free.
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
You expect a balanced budget from unbalanced congressmen?

I move to fund the government Monday through Friday and to leave the weekends free.
I bet the government would work if we replaced the president with a temp. "Get the government moving and we might hire you."
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
You expect a balanced budget from unbalanced congressmen?

I move to fund the government Monday through Friday and to leave the weekends free.
A balanced budget, not a chance.

Most organizations have a budget in place at the beginning of the fiscal year. Congress never does.
 

joe1776

Well-Known Member

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
A balanced budget, not a chance.

Most organizations have a budget in place at the beginning of the fiscal year. Congress never does.
We actually did have a surplus during Clinton's presidency. Then Republicans took over, passed a tax cut and turned the country back to deficit. Then we had the Trump tax cut which made the deficit much worse.

One of the supreme policies of Republicans that I loathe is borrow and spend. It's one of the policy reasons I prefer Democrats - deficits are cut when they are in office. Yes, it's by raising taxes, but taxes are better than deficits.
 

Brickjectivity

wind and rain touch not this brain
Staff member
Premium Member
Hmmm, the President nor the executive branch gives final approval on budgets. It is up to congress.
The president joins a political party and is guided by that party and is in league with members in congress. The president is the leader of their party, too; and so can both influence congress through their party and require a 2/3 vote on any budget or sign any budget which gets the approval of a simple majority. Hence the president has more influence on the budget than any single member of congress and can sometimes control the budget. Its a matter of skill, statesmanship and public support.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
One of the supreme policies of Republicans that I loathe is borrow and spend. It's one of the policy reasons I prefer Democrats - deficits are cut when they are in office. Yes, it's by raising taxes, but taxes are better than deficits.
This is one of the reasons I stopped voting for Republicans. "Borrow and Spend"

Republicans will complain about the tax and spend Democrats. But they won't admit that borrow and spend is far worse. It's the reason that the Republicans have become the party of fiscal insanity. The federal deficit and debt go up when the Republicans are in control.
Tom
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
We actually did have a surplus during Clinton's presidency. Then Republicans took over, passed a tax cut and turned the country back to deficit. Then we had the Trump tax cut which made the deficit much worse.

One of the supreme policies of Republicans that I loathe is borrow and spend. It's one of the policy reasons I prefer Democrats - deficits are cut when they are in office. Yes, it's by raising taxes, but taxes are better than deficits.
Uh, you left out eight years under Obama, in which the deficit was doubled. Obama increased the deficit more than all previous Presidents, combined.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
Uh, you left out eight years under Obama, in which the deficit was doubled. Obama increased the deficit more than all previous Presidents, combined.
Here's the part you pretend to miss.
Obama was stuck with the fiscal disaster left by the Republicans. Obama didn't plunge this country into even worse fiscal disasters by reniging on the promises that the Republicans made. Or letting the manufacturing and banking industries go belly up.

Then you Republicans started blaming him for the fiscal insanity.
Tom
 

shmogie

Well-Known Member
Here's the part you pretend to miss.
Obama was stuck with the fiscal disaster left by the Republicans. Obama didn't plunge this country into even worse fiscal disasters by reniging on the promises that the Republicans made. Or letting the manufacturing and banking industries go belly up.

Then you Republicans started blaming him for the fiscal insanity.
Tom
So, the Republicans were responsible for bad risk loans, those that brought on the events of 2008 ?

What promises did the Republicans make that required doubling the deficit ?

So you believe that if an industry makes terrible financial decisions, it is up to the taxpayers to bail them out ?
 
Top