• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Quotes Series: From Quran- Authored by G-d not by Muhammad

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
I do not support the assertion that God actually wrote the Quran nor any of the scripture of the Abrahamic religions.

As a Baha'i I see God's inspiration and influence in scriptures, but also the human influence of the cultures of the times. They all pray to God.
"I do not support the assertion that God actually wrote the Quran"

Quran as the natural word "Quran" means is "a reading/recitation" authored by G-d and was primarily a Verbal Exhortation that G-d descended on the heart of Muhammad and Muhammad learnt it by heart and from Muhammad learnt his companions by heart and so on and so forth generation after generation. The system continues till date in almost every part of the World where Muslims live.
Quran was not in writing primarily.
Muhammad dictated it also to some scribes as a secondary measures. Both the systems are intact and support one another.
It is wrong to say that G-d wrote it, it is simply incorrect.
Right, please?

Regards

Regards
 
Last edited:

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Quotes Series: From Quran- Authored by G-d not by Muhammad

[29:49]وَ مَا کُنۡتَ تَتۡلُوۡا مِنۡ قَبۡلِہٖ مِنۡ کِتٰبٍ وَّ لَا تَخُطُّہٗ بِیَمِیۡنِکَ اِذًا لَّارۡتَابَ الۡمُبۡطِلُوۡنَ ﴿۴۹﴾
And thou didst not recite any Book before it, nor didst thou write one with thy right hand; in that case the liars would have doubted.
[29:50]بَلۡ ہُوَ اٰیٰتٌۢ بَیِّنٰتٌ فِیۡ صُدُوۡرِ الَّذِیۡنَ اُوۡتُوا الۡعِلۡمَ ؕ وَ مَا یَجۡحَدُ بِاٰیٰتِنَاۤ اِلَّا الظّٰلِمُوۡنَ ﴿۵۰﴾
Nay, it is a collection of clear Signs in the hearts of those who are given knowledge. And none but the wrongdoers deny Our Signs.

The Holy Quran - Chapter: 29: Al-`Ankabut

Regards
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Quotes Series: From Quran- Authored by G-d not by Muhammad

[29:49]وَ مَا کُنۡتَ تَتۡلُوۡا مِنۡ قَبۡلِہٖ مِنۡ کِتٰبٍ وَّ لَا تَخُطُّہٗ بِیَمِیۡنِکَ اِذًا لَّارۡتَابَ الۡمُبۡطِلُوۡنَ ﴿۴۹﴾
And thou didst not recite any Book before it, nor didst thou write one with thy right hand; in that case the liars would have doubted.
[29:50]بَلۡ ہُوَ اٰیٰتٌۢ بَیِّنٰتٌ فِیۡ صُدُوۡرِ الَّذِیۡنَ اُوۡتُوا الۡعِلۡمَ ؕ وَ مَا یَجۡحَدُ بِاٰیٰتِنَاۤ اِلَّا الظّٰلِمُوۡنَ ﴿۵۰﴾
Nay, it is a collection of clear Signs in the hearts of those who are given knowledge. And none but the wrongdoers deny Our Signs.

The Holy Quran - Chapter: 29: Al-`Ankabut

Regards
More circular reasoning. In other words you are saying that if I start a religion all I have to do to prove it is true is to say that it is from God and there will be people that deny this. Tell me that you do not see a problem with this.
 

TransmutingSoul

Veteran Member
Premium Member
"I do not support the assertion that God actually wrote the Quran"

Quran as the natural word "Quran" means is "a reading/recitation" authored by G-d and was primarily a Verbal Exhortation that G-d descended on the heart of Muhammad and Muhammad learnt it by heart and from Muhammad learnt his companions by heart and so on and so forth generation after generation. The system continues till date in almost every part of the World where Muslims live.
Quran was not in writing primarily.
Muhammad dictated it also to some scribes as a secondary measures. Both the systems are intact and support one another.
It is wrong to say that G-d wrote it, it is simply incorrect.
Right, please?

Regards

Regards

Please explain how that is any different from the Bible and the Baha'i Writings. Which are also God given Messages by God's Messengers Jesus Christ, the Bab and Baha'u'llah.

In the case of the Bab and Baha'u'llah, they wrote a lot, so maybe more accurate to say God wrote through them. The same explanations with supporting scriptures can also be given.

Regards Tony
 

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
Quotes Series: From Quran- Authored by G-d not by Muhammad

[29:49]وَ مَا کُنۡتَ تَتۡلُوۡا مِنۡ قَبۡلِہٖ مِنۡ کِتٰبٍ وَّ لَا تَخُطُّہٗ بِیَمِیۡنِکَ اِذًا لَّارۡتَابَ الۡمُبۡطِلُوۡنَ ﴿۴۹﴾
And thou didst not recite any Book before it, nor didst thou write one with thy right hand; in that case the liars would have doubted.
[29:50]بَلۡ ہُوَ اٰیٰتٌۢ بَیِّنٰتٌ فِیۡ صُدُوۡرِ الَّذِیۡنَ اُوۡتُوا الۡعِلۡمَ ؕ وَ مَا یَجۡحَدُ بِاٰیٰتِنَاۤ اِلَّا الظّٰلِمُوۡنَ ﴿۵۰﴾
Nay, it is a collection of clear Signs in the hearts of those who are given knowledge. And none but the wrongdoers deny Our Signs.

The Holy Quran - Chapter: 29: Al-`Ankabut

Regards

Have you ever read the Dhammapada ? Or Lankavatara Sutra ? Or the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali ?

Is there any reason why you wouldn’t ?
Is reading these books haram ?

Do you have any idea what they contain ?




Please explain how that is any different from the Bible and the Baha'i Writings. Which are also God given Messages by God's Messengers Jesus Christ, the Bab and Baha'u'llah.

In the case of the Bab and Baha'u'llah, they wrote a lot, so maybe more accurate to say God wrote through them. The same explanations with supporting scriptures can also be given.

Regards Tony

Have you ever read the Dhammapada ? Or Lankavatara Sutra ? Or the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali ?

If so, would you agree that spiritual teaching can be given without reference to God ?

Do you consider Gautama and Patanjali to be messengers ?

If not, can you please explain why not ?

Cheers
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Quotes Series: From Quran- Authored by G-d not by Muhammad

Quran is authored by G-d, not by Muhammad:

[26:193]وَ اِنَّہٗ لَتَنۡزِیۡلُ رَبِّ الۡعٰلَمِیۡنَ ﴿۱۹۳﴾ؕ
And verily this is a revelation from the Lord of the worlds.
[26:194]نَزَلَ بِہِ الرُّوۡحُ الۡاَمِیۡنُ ﴿۱۹۴﴾ۙ
The Spirit, Faithful to the Trust, has descended with it.
[26:196]بِلِسَانٍ عَرَبِیٍّ مُّبِیۡنٍ ﴿۱۹۶﴾ؕ
In plain and clear Arabic tongue.
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 26: Ash-Shu`ara'
Quran is not imagination of Muhammad's brain/mind/heart etc, and Muhammad never described it as such. Right, please?

Regards

I consider the heart of the Quran is Revelation inspired by God, not written by God, but written by Muhammad.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
"I do not support the assertion that God actually wrote the Quran"

Quran as the natural word "Quran" means is "a reading/recitation" authored by G-d and was primarily a Verbal Exhortation that G-d descended on the heart of Muhammad and Muhammad learnt it by heart and from Muhammad learnt his companions by heart and so on and so forth generation after generation. The system continues till date in almost every part of the World where Muslims live.
Quran was not in writing primarily.
Muhammad dictated it also to some scribes as a secondary measures. Both the systems are intact and support one another.
It is wrong to say that G-d wrote it, it is simply incorrect.
Right, please?

Regards

Regards
I describe it inspired by God, and written by Muhammad as with the writings of Baha'u'llah. The above does hedge on your original assertion.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
"I do not support the assertion that God actually wrote the Quran"

Quran as the natural word "Quran" means is "a reading/recitation" authored by G-d and was primarily a Verbal Exhortation that G-d descended on the heart of Muhammad and Muhammad learnt it by heart and from Muhammad learnt his companions by heart and so on and so forth generation after generation. The system continues till date in almost every part of the World where Muslims live.
Quran was not in writing primarily.
Muhammad dictated it also to some scribes as a secondary measures. Both the systems are intact and support one another.
It is wrong to say that G-d wrote it, it is simply incorrect.
Right, please?

Regards

Regards

The word translates as recitation or reading. Your addition 'authored by God' is not in the translation of the word.
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
Have you ever read the Dhammapada ? Or Lankavatara Sutra ? Or the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali ?

Is there any reason why you wouldn’t ?
Is reading these books haram ?

Do you have any idea what they contain ?






Have you ever read the Dhammapada ? Or Lankavatara Sutra ? Or the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali ?

If so, would you agree that spiritual teaching can be given without reference to God ?

Do you consider Gautama and Patanjali to be messengers ?

If not, can you please explain why not ?

Cheers
"Have you ever read the Dhammapada ?"

Yes, I have read Dhammapada and liked it very much.
I have also read "Gospel of Buddha".
I have read "The Bhagavad Gita".
I believe Buddha and Krishna were Prophets/Messengers of G-d .
Right, please?

Has one read Quran from cover to cover, please.
If not please start reading it.
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 1: Al-Fatihah

Regards
 

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
Yes, I have read Dhammapada and liked it very much.
I have also read "Gospel of Buddha".
I have read "The Bhagavad Gita".
I believe Buddha and Krishna were Prophets/Messengers of G-d .
Right, please?

Wrong.
You have read Dhammapada and think Gautama was a messenger from God ?
That is contrary to what he taught.
You may choose to reinterpret buddhism, but there is no basis for your claim.

As for the Bhagavad Gita, which I have read in its entirety many times over fifty years, it teaches that there is no qualitative difference between the individual and God.

Do you agree with that ?

By making it clear that there is no qualitative difference between the individual and God, the Gita is effectively atheistic in the final analysis, which is why Krishna says to “renounce religious ritual and the flowery language of the Vedas, and come directly to Me”.

You could say that buddhism is the realistic , and Bhagavad Gita the idealistic, expressions of self realisation.

Both Buddhism and the Bhagavad Gita teach that self realisation requires no intermediaries, and that what is realised is one’s own nature.

No, I have not read the entire Quran, though I did study with the Mevlevi Sufi order, and excerpts of the Quran were included in our study. Obviously, the main focus of the Mevlevi is the writing of Rumi, also Attar and Hafiz.

“I wish I could show you when you are lonely or in darkness the astonishing light of your own being.”
- Hafiz
 
Last edited:

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
"Have you ever read the Dhammapada ?"

Yes, I have read Dhammapada and liked it very much.
I have also read "Gospel of Buddha".
I have read "The Bhagavad Gita".
I believe Buddha and Krishna were Prophets/Messengers of G-d .
Right, please?

Has one read Quran from cover to cover, please.
If not please start reading it.
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 1: Al-Fatihah

Regards

If this is the case the Quran is not the only scripture inspired by God.
 

Howard Is

Lucky Mud
If this is the case the Quran is not the only scripture inspired by God.

But it is the only text mentioned which denies that self realisation is non-dual, and asserts that divinity is fundamentally separate from our own nature. It is also the only text in that group which demands unquestioning belief in an intermediary “messenger”, to an extent that is virtually worship of an ordinary human being.

That demand is made by the very being who wrote the book !

And THAT is hubris demanding idolatry.
 
Last edited:

England my lionheart

Rockerjahili Rebel
Premium Member
"Thee alone do we worship and Thee alone do we implore for help. Guide us in the right path." Quran 1:5-6 by G-d.
The Holy Quran - Chapter: 1: Al-Fatihah
Does one agree with the above? Or one doesn't?

Regards

Imo the quran was authored by Muhammed,if we look at the way it's written and where we can see that this is a human reaction to circumstances.

The peaceful suras of mecca are very different to those written in Medina/yathrib,for example caravan raiding and war booty,slaves chattals and real estate,the first time we see the word "jihad"was mentioned in the quran.

Imo you can see the ambitions of a human here using a supposed supernatural entity for gain,the night flight to Jerusalem for example to lay claims to more real estate,for me it was muhammed and perhaps someh from the companions like maybe they got him to change "the satanic verses".
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
But it is the only text mentioned which denies that self realisation is non-dual, and asserts that divinity is fundamentally separate from our own nature. It is also the only text in that group which demands unquestioning belief in an intermediary “messenger”, to an extent that is virtually worship of an ordinary human being.

That demand is made by the very being who wrote the book !

And THAT is hubris demanding idolatry.

I already stated that I believed that God did not author the Quran. My challenge @paarsurrey is presenting the contradictory view that the Quran is the only book authored by God, but stating that other religious leaders are manifestations of God.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
Does one agree with the contents of the two verses? If one agrees, and which I understand one does, then of course no discussion could ensue. Right, please?

Regards

I believe I mistook your wquestion as do we believe God said that. I certainly believe what it says up to this point: "The path of those on whom Thou hast bestowed Thy blessings, those who have not incurred Thy displeasure, and those who have not gone astray."

I believe I am much better off following Jesus in the person f the Paraclete. Following fellow believers often is not as fruitful.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
I might agree -- if and only if I could get that guidance to the "right path" directly from the source. But if I have to get it from an Iman or some other human who pretends to know God's mind, then no, I don't.

So far in my life, God has never spoken to me. A lot of ordinary humans have pretended that they could tell me what God wants me to know -- but I have zero reason to believe them, so I don't.

I believe back when I did not have a day to day relationship with Jesus, I depended on His word. I believe that is where most people are in their walk.
 

Evangelicalhumanist

"Truth" isn't a thing...
Premium Member
I believe back when I did not have a day to day relationship with Jesus, I depended on His word. I believe that is where most people are in their walk.
Well, I can't think why you'd say that's where "most people" are -- since more than two-thirds of the word are NOT Christian.
 
Top