Are you ready to concede that 82% accuracy is completely unrealistic based on the amount of information that you are lacking?
Each individual case doesn't automatically add the same fault from other equations faults to each individual sum.
Once that is added to the quantitative 82% accuracy, can you imagine in your mind how the accuracy diminishes proportionally as more unknowns are added to the equation?
Of course, and certain case information with limited case data the over percentage goes down for that case, not every case.
Yeshua becomes insignificant also. The word only occurs less than 25 times in the entire Tanach.
'Reductio ad Absurdum', in our
Rules of Reasoning clearly making bad sums.
Cannabis in Bible Vs Word Etymology = Zan's Sum: History from study of religions globally, Zoroastrian (+5.5%), Hindu on Soma (+4.4%), Buddha on Bhang (+3.3%), Sula Bennet's work on Anthropological line (+7.7%), study of Shamanic medicine in many cultures (+10.2%), the word matching in sound (+10.2%), the same spellings to etymological roots (+12.7%), etc...
These are all cases that show a high rate of probability in each case, that then only add a small percentage to the overall case.
As you rightly point out there are reductive sums that need to happen, like we're not sure about anything really, and other questions of questioning everything; which then minus the sum to a clear 82% on that specific topic overall for example.
So on the case of
Proving Yeshua as the Messiah we have to deal with the specific data.
To overlook those 25 statements on the salvation of God (
H3444) taking place in the Bible, which is a book about the salvation of God is sort of missing the end result of the book.
So for example case file:
Genesis 49:10 The scepter will not depart from Judah, nor the ruler’s staff from between his feet, until he comes to whom it belongs. To him will the obedience of the peoples be.
Who is this we wait for as Messiah?
Genesis 49:18 I have waited for your salvation (H3444), Yahweh.
Then the next usage of Yeshua is in the Separating of the Red Sea (Exodus 14:13), and the Song of Moses (Exodus 15:2).
Next why does the Curse of Moses get placed, because they've rejected who?
Deuteronomy 32:15 But Jeshurun grew fat, and kicked. You have grown fat. You have grown thick. You have become sleek. Then he abandoned God who made him, and rejected the Rock of his salvation (H3444).
Like these accumulate to such a sum that there is an overall percentage of the sum having 95% in places, even with massive deductions from error, it shows God is very real, and the Bible is a master piece; yet to understand it, we need the wisdom of a Genius, as God literally will have to guide people to the highest understandings within it, as the maths nears perfection within the matrix.
That or people could
download Esword, word search Strongs reference number '
H3444' (Yeshua - Salvation) in a KJV+ Bible to study the results of the case files presented.
In my opinion.