sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Tell that to Westboro...Real Christians may protest peacefully, but real Christians would not be spewing out anger and profanities.
Oh, wait. The whole "Real Christian" thing.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Tell that to Westboro...Real Christians may protest peacefully, but real Christians would not be spewing out anger and profanities.
You mean that you did not understand the explanation. Once again, I am responding to you in the same manner that you respond to others. You have no grounds for complaint.
I offered a serious discussion, but we would both have to follow certain rules for that.
Now you are bearing false witness again. I explained to you how you screwed up. You ignored the explanation.
That verse does not claim that the Bible is the word of God, it does not even claim that it is accurate. Why do you have so much trouble properly supporting your posts? You should have quoted it, then it might have been obvious even to you.
Your refusal to understand does not mean that an event did not happen. And once again I am using your posts as an example of boosting style. By your poor standards you were refuted. I invited you several times to a serious discussion but you ran away.No, I am not bearing false witness. You explained nothing. You made statements but when I ask you a question you offer no explanation.
As I said, the verse given, (2 Timothy 3:16-17) was given with other verses to prove the Bible does declare itself the Word of God. You want to ignore what I said, and what the Bible said because what it said, shows you don't know what your are talking about when it comes to the Bible.
Good-Ole-Rebel
The number one rule would be no false claims about others. If you keep repeating your lies then there is no point in even trying.No. You gave no explanation.
How are you responding to me in the way I am to others?
You offered nothing.
What rules?
Good-Ole-Rebel
Your refusal to understand does not mean that an event did not happen. And once again I am using your posts as an example of boosting style. By your poor standards you were refuted. I invited you several times to a serious discussion but you ran away.
And once again, the verses that you chose did not support your claims.. You could not even do a copy and paste of them, a tacit testimony to their failure.
The number one rule would be no false claims about others. If you keep repeating your lies then there is no point in even trying.
Who else would feel that people aligning themselves with "Satan" were a big problem? What other religions even recognize "Satan?"
Of course. That has nothing to do with the discussion.Do you own a Bible?
Good-Ole-Rebel
When you make false claims that you cannot support that is lying. If you understood your Bible you would know that is not a proper thing to do.Again, how are you responding to me in the way I am to others?
So, the rules are, no saying anything Subduction Zone claims are lies. Typical.
Good-Ole-Rebel
Well, probably it's because it is a problem.
https://nypost.com/2019/05/29/satanic-temple-slams-supreme-court-abortion-ruling-on-fetal-remains/
They want aborted fetuses to be tossed in the street. Zero respect for human life.
Satan isn't real. I don't have a beef with that part. My beef is with the other stuff.
Of course. That has nothing to do with the discussion.
When you make false claims that you cannot support that is lying. If you understood your Bible you would know that is not a proper thing to do.
Because that is how one presents one's claims. Your only excuse may have been that you were ignorant. Now you know better.Of course it does. Why then do I need to copy and paste? I gave you the verses.
Good-Ole-Rebel
And it was explained to you why you failed. Denying that fact is a lie. You may not have liked the refutation , but that does not mean it did not happen.I did support what I said with the Scriptures. You understood what they said, as you claimed they were taken out of context. I am assuming you actually read them.
So what are the rules other then the one I described?
Good-Ole-Rebel
Because that is how one presents one's claims. Your only excuse may have been that you were ignorant. Now you know better.
And it was explained to you why you failed. Denying that fact is a lie. You may not have liked the refutation , but that does not mean it did not happen.
I honestly didn't read anywhere in the article where it said the group wanted to "toss aborted fetuses in the street." Make stuff up much?Well, probably it's because it is a problem.
https://nypost.com/2019/05/29/satanic-temple-slams-supreme-court-abortion-ruling-on-fetal-remains/
They want aborted fetuses to be tossed in the street. Zero respect for human life.
Satan isn't real. I don't have a beef with that part. My beef is with the other stuff.
Sorry, but that is not good enough. If you don't do your homework post rudely you cannot expect polite behavior in return.No, I gave the verses which you say you read. No need to copy and paste. If a certain verse is in question, then you can voice an opposition as to why and explain. But you only voice opposition without explanation.
As soon as you learn that technique, we can proceed.
Good-Ole-Rebel
Repeating a false claim does not make it true.See post #(176)
Good-Ole-Rebel