this could be true; especially if the discussion is riddled with subjective statements that aren't necessarily indicative of the overall situation.Debate seems to be more aggressive because there historically can be a 'winner' but you can't really win a discussion.. haha
case in point:
being in the military doesn't make you a better/worse person
vs
being in the military makes you a better or worse person based on posters opinion.
the first statement is a discussion
the second is a subjective debate
so then why allow subjective statements in a discussion?
isn't the discussion already distorted when subjective statements are made vs using research, investigative information? unbiased facts?
Last edited: