• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why are School shooters always male?

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Most shooters are male for similar reasons for why most shooting victims are male. It has do to with how society does not value males correctly.

There is nothing inherent in maleness that is toxic.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
There is nothing inherent in maleness that is toxic.
Males are far more likely to commit acts of physical violence against other people. Being raised to bottle up and not properly express and deal with emotions is very toxic. More deaths from high-risk behavior and delaying the seeking of medical attention is, I would say, toxic.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Every serial killer you can name was a bed wetter. That does not mean bed wetters are at risk of becoming serial killers.

Here's something to think about. With every mass shooter we hear they are..
-a Trump supporter
-a Trump hater
-a racist
-a rightwinger
-a leftwinger
-a christian
-etc.

What we don't ever hear is their mental history and if they were or had been on pchyciatric drugs.

The thing is, normal people don't go do mass shootings.
 
Last edited:

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
If that's the case, it doesn't mean all bed wetters will be serial killers, but it's a tie to/with all serial killers.
It's called a coincidence. In science it's dismissed with "correlation does not mean causation." There are a number of characteristics and background features that serial killers almost universally share. However, everything down to the differences in brain structures are found in people who aren't serial killers. There is no direct link or tie, but in any scenario something like bed wetting is a piece of a larger whole.
As for psychotropic medications, we've been studying several of them for many decades now. We have a pretty good idea of what they do and don't do to people. Turning them violent is a trend that just has not been found.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
It's called a coincidence. In science it's dismissed with "correlation does not mean causation." There are a number of characteristics and background features that serial killers almost universally share. However, everything down to the differences in brain structures are found in people who aren't serial killers. There is no direct link or tie, but in any scenario something like bed wetting is a piece of a larger whole.
As for psychotropic medications, we've been studying several of them for many decades now. We have a pretty good idea of what they do and don't do to people. Turning them violent is a trend that just has not been found.

Regardless it's something that ties all serial killers together.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Here's something to think about. With every mass shooter we hear they are..
-a Trump supporter
-a Trump hater
-a racist
-rightwinger
-a leftwinger
-etc.

What we don't ever hear is their mental history and if they were or had been on pchyciatric drugs.

The thing is, normal people don't go do mass shootings.
Probably because some things, such as adhering to a radical political or religious ideology, has been demonstrated repeatedly to have a much stronger correlation to and better predictor of violence than someone having a mental illness and/or being medicated for it. As for some stuff, it's because controversy sells.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Males are far more likely to commit acts of physical violence against other people. Being raised to bottle up and not properly express and deal with emotions is very toxic. More deaths from high-risk behavior and delaying the seeking of medical attention is, I would say, toxic.
Violence per se is not toxic. It is how violence is expressed that determines its morality, or lack thereof. I reject your assumption that males are more violent than females. Both genders are equally violent. It is just how each gender expresses their violence that is different.

I repeat, there is nothing inherent in maleness that is toxic.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Probably because some things, such as adhering to a radical political or religious ideology, has been demonstrated repeatedly to have a much stronger correlation to and better predictor of violence than someone having a mental illness and/or being medicated for it.

Sure thing. Mental hospitals, pchyciatric wards, 96 hour holds, etc are filled with people because of their religion, being racist, or their political affiliation rather than their mental problems. Got it :)
 

We Never Know

No Slack
Probably because some things, such as adhering to a radical political or religious ideology, has been demonstrated repeatedly to have a much stronger correlation to and better predictor of violence than someone having a mental illness and/or being medicated for it. As for some stuff, it's because controversy sells.

Oh and before I forget. If you can't tie bed wetting to serial killers, you can't tie racist, political affiliation, religion, etc to mass shooters. Because there are millions of each of those that don't go around doing mass shootings.

Again I repeat, normal people don't go out and do mass shootings. You seem to always ignore that statement.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
And I heard that every single person that had an abortion has been female. Should we spay ever female?

If it makes you feel better about your gender then feel free to try.

BTW Abortion is not illegal.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
I'm sure there must be some exceptions to the rule.

I haven't googled it to find exceptions but I'm sure they exist.

However, every school shooter that I can recall hearing about here in America has been male.

Why do you think that is, and do you think testosterone plays a large role in it?

(I remember living in a foster home that was a farm, and much of the bad behavior seen in bulls, was prevented if you removed their testicles at a young age. I'm not suggesting that is a solution, but interesting nonetheless how much having balls affects a mammals behavior.)

I'm willing to be corrected, but perhaps because males are more likely to externalise their anger (taking it out on others) whilst females are more likely to internalise it (taking it out on themselves)? Not sure about the statistics, but suicide (attempts) seems to be more common in females too, along with self-abuse (such as cutting)? Perhaps testosterone is involved in this.
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
There's a clean cut gap between suicidal and homicidal and that's our 1st amendment and 2nd amendment freedoms to go monkey crazy on all you monkeys. You guys got lying TVs with child-like stories, lying police departments and double-agent contacts, buying the lie about you're different from any other cornered rat.

Sure thing. Mental hospitals, pchyciatric wards, 96 hour holds, etc are filled with people because of their religion, being racist, or their political affiliation rather than their mental problems. Got it :)

By the way (PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIKE YOU) take you by the wrist to counseling and mental exams with no evident or expressed threats or inconveniences even so (PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIKE YOU) can make inquiries into reasons they can expel you so that (PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIKE YOU) they move on with something in their heads that sounds nice.Deep bow, mental service to my community.
 

Kangaroo Feathers

Yea, it is written in the Book of Cyril...
There's a clean cut gap between suicidal and homicidal and that's our 1st amendment and 2nd amendment freedoms to go monkey crazy on all you monkeys. You guys got lying TVs with child-like stories, lying police departments and double-agent contacts, buying the lie about you're different from any other cornered rat.



By the way (PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIKE YOU) take you by the wrist to counseling and mental exams with no evident or expressed threats or inconveniences even so (PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIKE YOU) can make inquiries into reasons they can expel you so that (PEOPLE THAT DON'T LIKE YOU) they move on with something in their heads that sounds nice.Deep bow, mental service to my community.
Remember what I said the other day about proof reading before posting?
 

MikeDwight

Well-Known Member
What would that be? Presbyterian is sociologically insane by the way. Right? anybody? Where's the connections and the in-groups and the authority figures? Toss them in, toss the key. My university took any extra credit philosophy and singled me out, unasked for, counseling never asked for, tries to throw you under the bus, no thanks, they throw you under the bus for on-point focused interaction with their students however they recommend to you. See everybody's going to have every right your whole life to total unmitigated discrimination on your person on simple interest in doing that.
 

Milton Platt

Well-Known Member
I'm sure there must be some exceptions to the rule.

I haven't googled it to find exceptions but I'm sure they exist.

However, every school shooter that I can recall hearing about here in America has been male.

Why do you think that is, and do you think testosterone plays a large role in it?

(I remember living in a foster home that was a farm, and much of the bad behavior seen in bulls, was prevented if you removed their testicles at a young age. I'm not suggesting that is a solution, but interesting nonetheless how much having balls affects a mammals behavior.)

Can't answer that question exactly, but you might find this interesting:

'Guns don't kill people; men and boys kill people,' experts say
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
Why are School shooters always male?
Males are the only people who need to compensate for the size of their penis.

dj8f6dm5dg.jpg



.
 
Last edited:

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
I'm sure there must be some exceptions to the rule.

I haven't googled it to find exceptions but I'm sure they exist.

However, every school shooter that I can recall hearing about here in America has been male.

Why do you think that is, and do you think testosterone plays a large role in it?

(I remember living in a foster home that was a farm, and much of the bad behavior seen in bulls, was prevented if you removed their testicles at a young age. I'm not suggesting that is a solution, but interesting nonetheless how much having balls affects a mammals behavior.)

Public education in America is controlled by the liberal left. A school being the target, implies that the psychological damage done to the shooters appears to have a connection to liberal education and indoctrination; school. He is striking back at school and their next zombie army.

Among the many things that the children are indoctrinated in American public schools is blaming males, especially white Christian straight males for all the woes of the world. Some boys transform into the self for filling bad boy image suggested by the propaganda.

An analogy is if a parent called a child, stupid, enough times, some children will begin to think they are stupid. Some children will even try to please the adults by deliberately trying not to be smart. All the left wing adult led negative propaganda, has had a long term adverse impact on some of the boys.

In liberals education, girls are placed on a pedestal so there is no need to strike back. The propaganda say they are the innocent victims. That is their programmed role. A female cannot be a male-o-phobe no matter how many times she recites the propaganda that stereotypes males in bad light. This lopsided illogic is part of the indoctrination process designed to conflict with justice and create backlash.

Only a boy will be called phobic if he tries to be reasonable about any of the lopsided propaganda and revisionist history. The boys are implied to be damaged, from day one, just due to being born a male. Doesn't feminist propaganda say that males are destines to be predators due to their DNA? You get what you ask for if you start his young enough.

\
 
Top