• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Environmentalism, Anti-Immigrantism, White Supremacism, & Terrorism....A Connection?

Dan From Smithville

What's up Doc?
Staff member
Premium Member
I too am a fan of correctly identifying masonry.
But we should still keep things in perspective.
I like natural stone for its appearance and durability. It blends so well with the environment. If I am going to lob masonry, 9 times out of 10, it will be natural stone.
 

Dan From Smithville

What's up Doc?
Staff member
Premium Member
There are a couple people I rub the wrong way.
Moreover, I'm not sure there's anyone I rub the right way.
I'm sorry. I must have misread the title again. I thought this thread was about political extremism. I'll be going now. Don't get up on my account. Yawl just stay right were ya are and I'll get the door.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
The Video of the rock throwers clearly shows them waving people out of the way and it was evident they were targeting the bus and not the people (who also appear to be anti-fascists) standing in-between the bus and them. You're really grasping at straws here.

No they did. More so a lot of people on the side-walk never even looked at the rock throwers below them. Try again. Beside attacking people for holding a views you do like are fascist tactics.


Nontheless, the point I was initially making in this thread is that Ngo's reporting of the interaction was entirely dishonest and intended to provide cover to the fascists.

Ngo is an outrage media pundit.

Seeing as you have denounced "both sides" you should agree with me on this in some capacity.

I do. The whole protest situation has just became a location for two or more groups to have their violent political conflicts. Antifa goes to protests of groups they do not like in order to attack people. The right-wing groups are doing the same. Neither is trying to reduce the violence. They want it. Portland's mayor is weak hence why this stuff happens all the time in the city instead of some place in Texas.

You admit yourself that these fascists came for a fight.

Of course they did. Half those fools are wearing DIY body armour and weapons. The conflict feeds both, or more, group's self-righteous complex. Hence why I said they are larpers. They are acting their conflict as if far greater than a brawl. Hence why your link has fools comparing themselves to D-day troops. Which is ironic given the US military's views of race at the time. Blacks were not consider fit to be combat soldiers. They were cooks and labourers. Britain had to use it's empire to serve while many of it's colonies independence movements were crushed. Toss in Stalin had to curb communist movement in those areas lest the alliance collapse.

They initiated an attack with hammers on a person who had not engaged in any violence.

Looks like it at this time. They came out fighting a group that was attacking the vehicle. All these violent groups show up trying to provoke each other to attacks. Antifa attacks the vehicle which is a crime. The group in the bus comes out swinging with weapons, a crime. A lot of the time the courts call it a wash unless someone is seriously injured.

Ngo refuses to admit that the neo-nazis attacked an innocent man, continually providing cover for the fascists.

Ngo sells one side of the story pay his bills. He is using media protection in law from libel and slander to say what he wants like a lot of people in the media do these days.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
If embracing a good cause can lead some people to do more good, then why can it not lead others to do more bad? If I support a good cause, then I can justify the extremes I have to go to in support of that cause.

I think it is a phenomenon of the extremes used to justify a position that is seen as maniacal by the rest of society.

Environmental reform as the side effect of extreme fascist racism is certainly conceivable. The German highway system and transportation benefited as a side effect to Nazi extremism. Though I am not suggesting that it was worth all the millions of lives that were lost. It is only noted as a side effect that had a positive result and not as justification for genocide.
Some people ya just don't want supporting your favorite causes.
 

wellwisher

Well-Known Member
What ( in your opinion ) would be some good actions to take and changes to make?

The main problem is, the Democrats use the same ole Democrat playbook every election time. This involves blaming the other side for racism, so they will not lose the black and minority vote.

This cycle has gotten especially bad because some polls show the minority vote is shifting toward Trump because of the good economy for minorities. The left thinks they can reverse this trend, like they always do, by accusing Trump and his followers of things they feel can scare the minorities back to them. This blame game is not new but is used every election cycle. Do you remember how Mitt Romney was accused of wanted to stave the elderly, according to page 17 of the Democrat propaganda manual? This was the vote they feared was leaving them.

Consider the collusion delusion. This was the Democrats bearing false witness in an attempt to make Trump look criminal and suspicious. The goal was to separate him from his voters before the midterms. It was all a scam. This was a new scam that they were prototyping. When it did not work, they went back to the more traditional Democrat playbook; white supremacy. Notice how this did not really get stoked, until plan A failed.

In terms of immigrants, a rational person sees two kinds of immigration. One is legal and plays by the rules. The other is illegal and breaks the laws. The current Democrat scam involves not making any distinction between legal and illegal, since they need this confusion to get away with their own crimes. This is going to backfire when the spy gate trials begin.

To the Democrat propaganda machine, the shopper and shoplifter are both the same, since they both leave the store with merchandise. If you dislike and condemn the shoplifter, you also hate the shopper. You are called an anti-shopper. The left base are not the sharpest tools in the shed and cannot see this distinction made by the rational right. The left base falls for it every time. They cannot or will not see the Democrat dual standards, which are basis for many of their hate games. The way to fix this is to defeat the Democrats in elections and continue to dismantle their repressive hate traditions.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
The main problem is, the Democrats use the same ole Democrat playbook every election time. This involves blaming the other side for racism, so they will not lose the black and minority vote.

This cycle has gotten especially bad because some polls show the minority vote is shifting toward Trump because of the good economy for minorities. The left thinks they can reverse this trend, like they always do, by accusing Trump and his followers of things they feel can scare the minorities back to them. This blame game is not new but is used every election cycle. Do you remember how Mitt Romney was accused of wanted to stave the elderly, according to page 17 of the Democrat propaganda manual? This was the vote they feared was leaving them.

Consider the collusion delusion. This was the Democrats bearing false witness in an attempt to make Trump look criminal and suspicious. The goal was to separate him from his voters before the midterms. It was all a scam. This was a new scam that they were prototyping. When it did not work, they went back to the more traditional Democrat playbook; white supremacy. Notice how this did not really get stoked, until plan A failed.

In terms of immigrants, a rational person sees two kinds of immigration. One is legal and plays by the rules. The other is illegal and breaks the laws. The current Democrat scam involves not making any distinction between legal and illegal, since they need this confusion to get away with their own crimes. This is going to backfire when the spy gate trials begin.

To the Democrat propaganda machine, the shopper and shoplifter are both the same, since they both leave the store with merchandise. If you dislike and condemn the shoplifter, you also hate the shopper. You are called an anti-shopper. The left base are not the sharpest tools in the shed and cannot see this distinction made by the rational right. The left base falls for it every time. They cannot or will not see the Democrat dual standards, which are basis for many of their hate games. The way to fix this is to defeat the Democrats in elections and continue to dismantle their repressive hate traditions.

So what exactly is I supposed argue with in that???
 

Brickjectivity

Turned to Stone. Now I stretch daily.
Staff member
Premium Member
The main problem is, the Democrats use the same ole Democrat playbook every election time. This involves blaming the other side for racism, so they will not lose the black and minority vote.
I was asking Audi, someone who has immigrated, for their informed and educated opinion; specifically because I don't want to hear propaganda about demoncrats or repugnicans. You've been telling me poison about a party which you heard because some poll indicated that those words would be convincing to your sector of the population. I'm sure you write checks to one of the parties and would like to see them win. Good for you. You may just as well be sending that money to a paper shredder, because it goes into someone's pocket and hardly helps anyone. Its a two party system because of how the voting works, and they'll never tell you the whole story, nor will you ever want to hear it.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
They lie about Jews, POC and Anti-fascists, why wouldn't they lie about wanting and being able to save the environment too?

There is no link between environmentalism and bigotry. Just a case where bigots happen to be concerned about the environment as a side dish.

A link between anti-immigration and white supremacy? Now you're onto something.
Environmentalism is a fascist system very very similar to Nazism.

I remember when the green eco flags first came out. You could almost hear Heil Hitler.
 
Top