• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Why are the Sciences Empirical?

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Recently, I heard someone allege that the sciences are empirically oriented because they are dominated by atheists who wish to deny the existence of God. Going beyond the obvious truth of that [/sarcasm], what other reasons might there be for why the sciences are empirically oriented?
 
Last edited:

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Recently, I heard someone allege that the sciences are empirically oriented because they are dominated by atheists who wish to deny the existence of God. Going beyond the obvious truth of that, what other reasons might there be for why the sciences are empirically oriented?
That's foolish.

The sciences are empirical because they were spawned by empiricists.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
That's foolish.

The sciences are empirical because they were spawned by empiricists.

Patty, may I ask if you are offering that as a genuine reason for why the sciences are empirical, or are you just being sarcastic? Either way is ok with me. I'm just looking for clarification.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Patty, may I ask if you are offering that as a genuine reason for why the sciences are empirical, or are you just being sarcastic? Either way is ok with me. I'm just looking for clarification.
Both.

There are no sciences without empiricsts.
 

sun rise

The world is on fire
Premium Member
Both.

There are no sciences without empiricsts.
Or in other words, if it's not wet, it can't be water.

It would be possible to conceive of knowledge about how the world works without empiricism. It might be direct knowledge without proof but it would have to take into account that the world works in ways that baffle the senses as we have them today.

For example, we might be able to "see" quantum mechanics in operation without a lot of math and experimental observations. But that would not be science.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Since information about our universe isn't provided (outside of science),
we must discover it for ourselves. Empiricism is a method, ie, observing
that universe's phenomena & properties. And it's the only method with
results which are accessible to any intelligent person. This is as opposed
to something personal, eg, intuition, faith.
 
Last edited:

Cooky

Veteran Member
Since information about our universe isn't provided (outside of science),
we must discover it for ourselves. Empiricism is a method, ie, observing
that universe's phenomena & properties. And it's the only method which
is accessible to any intelligent person. This is as opposed to something
personal, eg, intuition, faith.

Intuition is much like imagination...

"Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand." ~ Albert Einstein
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Intuition is much like imagination...

"Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited to all we know and understand, while imagination embraces the entire world, and all there ever will be to know and understand." ~ Albert Einstein
Empiricism allows testing what we imagine.
 

Polymath257

Think & Care
Staff member
Premium Member
There is actually a fairly long history leading up to the scientific revolution and the adoption of the scientific method. And this happened before the concept of a profession of 'scientist' was invented.

One of the most important changes for the rise of science was the determination that ideas about the natural world could be subject to testing within the natural world. That is what ultimately became empiricism.

But it should be pointed out that, contrary to your friend's claim, the original exponents of empiricism were religious people thinking they were investigating God's plan for the universe by considering how His work functions.

Ultimately, empiricism showed its value because of the results of the scientific revolution and the realization that simply 'sitting and thinking' was not enough to determine truth.

The dominance of atheists (such as it is) came much later.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
And imagining new ways to test it - which, if Einstein really said what the quote claims, is probably what he had in mind.

Actually, the point is that imagination is larger than science. Because without imagination, there would be no science.
 

Cooky

Veteran Member
There is actually a fairly long history leading up to the scientific revolution and the adoption of the scientific method. And this happened before the concept of a profession of 'scientist' was invented.

One of the most important changes for the rise of science was the determination that ideas about the natural world could be subject to testing within the natural world. That is what ultimately became empiricism.

But it should be pointed out that, contrary to your friend's claim, the original exponents of empiricism were religious people thinking they were investigating God's plan for the universe by considering how His work functions.

Ultimately, empiricism showed its value because of the results of the scientific revolution and the realization that simply 'sitting and thinking' was not enough to determine truth.

The dominance of atheists (such as it is) came much later.

Yes, someone had to invent science. That invention was based on imagination and not empirical evidence.
 

Willamena

Just me
Premium Member
Since information about our universe isn't provided (outside of science),
we must discover it for ourselves. Empiricism is a method, ie, observing
that universe's phenomena & properties. And it's the only method which is accessible to any intelligent person. This is as opposed to something personal, eg, intuition, faith.
I agree, except for the ampersand.

We do not directly observe ampersands.
 

siti

Well-Known Member
Actually, the point is that imagination is larger than science. Because without imagination, there would be no science.
Well the second part is basically what I said - isn't it? And the first part...is it not also true that the number of ideas is larger than the number of good ideas?
 
Top