• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Donald Trump And His Struggle With Alzheimer's?

Shad

Veteran Member
Okay.

"Donald Trump And His Struggle With Alzheimer's?"

Know what a question mark means?

ques·tion mark
/ˈkwesCHən ˌmärk/
noun
noun: question mark; plural noun: question marks; noun: questionmark; plural noun: questionmarks
a punctuation mark (?) indicating a question.
used to express doubt or uncertainty about something.

.

No "is" is part of the question. Ergo not a question about if he has it at all. You have already concluded he has it thus is already struggling. The only question you put forward is the level of his struggle.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Ergo the opinion is garbage as a layman is making it that has no qualification to make such a conclusion.
That's right.

Yet someone made the thread as if this opinion means anything.
I would have hoped that you would have sympathy for them, since you chimed in with an opinion about ethical obligations when you apparently had no qualifications to make that conclusion.

And good thing, too, since in most professional associations, it's a breach of the code of ethics to accuse someone of an ethical breach when no breach actually occurred.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
No "is" is part of the question. Ergo not a question about if he has it at all. You have already concluded he has it thus is already struggling. The only question you put forward is the level of his struggle.
Sorry you have such trouble with English grammar. Is that why you declined to answer my question in post 38?

"Exactly what was Trump diagnosed with?"
or is it because there is no diagnosis? :D Here, you don't even have to write out an answer, just check off the appropriate box.

☐ "I have trouble with English grammar"
☐ "There is no diagnosis"


.
 
Last edited:

Shad

Veteran Member
That's right.


I would have hoped that you would have sympathy for them, since you chimed in with an opinion about ethical obligations when you apparently had no qualifications to make that conclusion.

I do not need qualification as I cited the mainstream US organization of the specific field. I cited their view. Try again.

And good thing, too, since in most professional associations, it's a breach of the code of ethics to accuse someone of an ethical breach when no breach actually occurred.

Wrong as per my citation. Try again.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Sorry you have such trouble with English grammar. Is that why you declined to answer my question in post 38?

"Exactly what was Trump diagnosed with?"
or is it because there is no diagnosis? :D Here, you don't even have to write out an answer, just check off the appropriate box.

☐ "I have trouble with English grammar"
☐ "There is no diagnosis"


.

And I pointed out your OP title. You took the article and made a conclusion of a medical problem. Try again.

You messed up with the OP title. Your problem.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
I do not need qualification as I cited the mainstream US organization of the specific field. I cited their view. Try again.
Maybe next time read what you cite. The Goldwater rule applies to psychiatrists specifically.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
And I pointed out your OP title. You took the article and made a conclusion of a medical problem. Try again.

You messed up with the OP title. Your problem.

Yeah, I thought you'd run from my challenge.
mocking-smiley-emoticon.gif
"Tee Hee"
Have a good day.

.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Yeah, I thought you'd run from my challenge.
mocking-smiley-emoticon.gif
"Tee Hee"
Have a good day.

.

I didn't run away. I pointed out the OP title already concludes Trump has Alzheimer. You tried to play word games but are horrible at it as you ignored what "struggle with" means. I just didn't give you the answer you wanted to hear nor caved to your failed attempt to change the meaning of the OP. Your problem. Try again.
 
Last edited:

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Okay.

"Donald Trump And His Struggle With Alzheimer's?"
Know what a question mark means?
Sorry, but even I find that a lame justification. When someone on the right does that to a progressive politician it is unacceptable.

Is Obama a secret Muslim?

Is Clinton a Lesbian?

Is Sanders a Communist?

I have seen all of these, and the question mark doesn’t make the accusation any less odious.




Tump is mentally and psychologically unfit to hold any office. I have no problem saying that and standing by it. No “question” about it.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
Sorry, but even I find that a lame justification. When someone on the right does that to a progressive politician it is unacceptable.

Is Obama a secret Muslim?

Is Clinton a Lesbian?

Is Sanders a Communist?

I have seen all of these, and the question mark doesn’t make the accusation any less odious.




Tump is mentally and psychologically unfit to hold any office. I have no problem saying that and standing by it. No “question” about it.

I remember Fox News running the same babble over Hillary's tongue sore, her falling down, coughing, need to drink water a lot, etc. If the posters were consistent they must hold the view that Hillary was not mentally fit for office. Ergo a wash of 2016.

All of this just an argument from authority or false authority in order to fit their bias and TDS. Your view included.
 

Shad

Veteran Member
And dismissing an idea with those three letters is a particularly pathetic ad hominem.

You have no argument ergo you misapplied the fallacy. You are no expert yet you have no issues making a conclusion about Trump. You own point is turning in your hand. Try again son. I just used your own position against you. You refuted your own point. Impressive.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
Splitting hairs over 4 months when you consider they are accusing him of dementia over it.
If you can't remember where your parents or your kids were born, there is something wrong. That's not splitting hairs.

If taken by itself, it's no big deal. When taken together with everything else we know, it's another nail in the coffin.
 

Enoch07

It's all a sick freaking joke.
Premium Member
If you can't remember where your parents or your kids were born, there is something wrong. That's not splitting hairs.

If taken by itself, it's no big deal. When taken together with everything else we know, it's another nail in the coffin.

Nah it's just petty hair splitting and you know it. So desperate to find something to try and hang the bad orange man. Honestly all it does is make the left look pathetic and weak.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Alzheimer falls into that field. Try again.
I didn't say "psychiatry;" I said "psychiatrists." Please read posts before you reply to them.

The rule is still about methods and ethnics. It is applicable to other medical fields.
No, it isn't.

The whole point of professional codes of ethics is that licensed professionals take on duties above and beyond those of the general public.

Do you think that @Skwim is a licensed psychiatrist?
 

Shad

Veteran Member
I didn't say "psychiatry;" I said "psychiatrists." Please read posts before you reply to them.

The title of one certified in the field I said.... Try again.


No, it isn't.

Wrong.

The whole point of professional codes of ethics is that licensed professionals take on duties above and beyond those of the general public.

The rule in question is about not using the methods which includes an examination of the patient then making a conclusion about their health in politics to the public. It is a giant argument from authority used to manipulate politics.

Do you think that @Skwim is a licensed psychiatrist?

No. Ergo hence why I said it is just a layman's conclusion backed by another layman's conclusion. It is still an ethical problem as people are using medical terms thus are framing an argument while have no ability to make such a diagnosis.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
Several years ago John McCain had a problem remembering what he was going to say. Tr The Trump Sheeples cheered
Nah it's just petty hair splitting and you know it. So desperate to find something to try and hang the bad orange man. Honestly all it does is make the left look pathetic and weak.
Sheeples are pathetic and weak.

Donald mocks a heavyset man who he believes is a protester. Shouting, “That guy has got a serious weight problem. Go home, get some exercise!” The sheeples laugh and roar their approval.

Later, the Trump fan brushed it off while heaping praise on Trump.

“Everything is good,” Dawson exclaimed. “I love the guy. He is the best thing that ever happened to this country.”

What else would you expect from Trump Sheeles. What else would we expect from you.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
You should go get checked for mentall illness.

"Tr The Trump"

Tsk tsk

See how petty it is to point out simple little mistakes?

What silly little mistake was I pointing out? The entire sentence was "Tr The Trump Sheeples cheered" Are you saying that Sheeples cheering Trump mocking McCain was a simple little mistake or are you saying that Trump mocking McCain was a simple little mistake?



In any case, it's not petty to point out that you completely ducked and dodged all the following...

Sheeples are pathetic and weak.

Donald mocks a heavyset man who he believes is a protester. Shouting, “That guy has got a serious weight problem. Go home, get some exercise!” The sheeples laugh and roar their approval.

Later, the Trump fan brushed it off while heaping praise on Trump.

“Everything is good,” Dawson exclaimed. “I love the guy. He is the best thing that ever happened to this country.”

What else would you expect from Trump Sheeples. What else would we expect from you.​
 
Top