• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Folly of Atheism

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
No one has ever been comforted by "evidence"

Lack of belief in God is, in fact, agnosticism - so why not call it that, rather than "atheism" ?
LOL Atheism is lack of belief, agnosticism is lack of knowledge. And if you don't know that, you don't know the first thing about atheism or agnosticism.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Absolutely FALSE. Proof? Your tiny god is not worshiped by very many people-- NONE of whom contributed to the Progress I mentioned.

So there you go: Dismissed for lack of evidence, and circumstantial evidence to the contrary.
It has NOTHING to do with how many people are Baha'is...
The coming of Baha'u'llah released the Holy Spirit into the world and that is responsible for all human progress.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
Why should an Expert Sniper *not* use a Sniper Rifle to "discipline" an unruly child, by shooting him in the head at 1000 yards?

You would correctly say, "EVIL" and "LUDICROUS".

The Sniper is responsible for his child...

But your Bully God gets an ... excuse because it is incompetent?
God is not incompetent.
It is people who are incompetent at evidence investigation.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Egocentric. No - it's focused on Truth.

And is a more honourable - and honest ! - pursuit than choosing not to seek Truth or pretending that it can't be found.

Why do so many claim the Truth, but their beliefs are contradictory and conflicting?

It's a very human thing.
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
The only possible explanations are, or ever will be, God or Chance.

Who or what created membraneless protocells ?
An alien scientist from a different dimension. And now that I have proven you wrong would you like to retract your statement that there are only two possible explanations?
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
Gleanings is not a Bronze Age book, it is a new age book. :D
Straw man. I was not trying to use the book to prove my claims.

My pardon-- a "new age" book that is intimately based on a Bronze Age Book.

Same stuff, second day.

Then why did you quote a book I do not consider a reliable authority, if not to prove or argue your claim?
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
It has NOTHING to do with how many people are Baha'is...
The coming of Baha'u'llah released the Holy Spirit into the world and that is responsible for all human progress.

Prove it.

Better yet? Prove that Benevolent Garden Pixies are NOT directly responsible for All Human Progress--

-- because I have it on Good Authority™ that no human ever got Inspired to think of a Good Idea, but what a Garden Pixie sat on his or her shoulder, and whispered Good Things into their subconscious.

Whichever "proof" you use to show Garden Pixies are myth? I'll apply with Equal Logic to your god-claims
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
Interesting question. Nobody knows exactly what happens after we die, but certain sources seem to be saying similar things. I think we will gravitate towards those who are at the same spiritual level as we are, based upon everything I have read about the afterlife in books such as these:

The Afterlife Revealed
Private Dowding
Heaven and Hell
I appreciate your effort and I will check them out. Here are some excellent books I strongly urge you to read. https://www.amazon.com/Michael-Newton/e/B000APC05I?ref=dbs_a_mng_rwt_scns_share
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
It has NOTHING to do with how many people are Baha'is...
The coming of Baha'u'llah released the Holy Spirit into the world and that is responsible for all human progress.
I think you mean "I believe the coming of Baha'u'llah released the Holy Spirit into the world...". If you phrase it as a fact you are required to provide evidence that shows beyond reasonable doubt that it actually happened.
 

ArtieE

Well-Known Member
God does not make mistakes because God is Infallible.
Humans think that God makes mistakes because humans are fallible.
This is logic 101 stuff.
Please stop making statements as if you are providing facts when all you are providing are beliefs and opinions.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
My pardon-- a "new age" book that is intimately based on a Bronze Age Book.

Same stuff, second day.

Then why did you quote a book I do not consider a reliable authority, if not to prove or argue your claim?
It is not based upon the Bible. It is a separate Revelation from God.
It is not the same stuff.
I am not trying to prove anything.
 

Trailblazer

Veteran Member
You keep using the word "evidence"-- but it does not mean what most people mean, when they say "evidence".

Do you see a problem, yet?
The problem is that most people do not consider the evidence to be evidence.
But what most people believe about the evidence does not prove anything.

Argumentum ad populum

In argumentation theory, an argumentum ad populum (Latin for "appeal to the people") is a fallacious argument that concludes that a proposition is true because many or most people believe it: "If many believe so, it is so." Argumentum ad populum - Wikipedia

The converse of this is that if many or most people do not believe it, it cannot be so, and that is fallacious. For example, there was a time in history when most people did not believe the earth was round, but most people were wrong, as we found out later.
 
Top