A number of posts and threads on this forum have gotten me to thinking about the concept of self-examination of what we believe and know. Some have pointed out that once a person is committed, they are unlikely to change very long-held views no matter what evidence they receive. Is this the case? In thinking on this subject, a number of questions have come to mind. Here are a few to ponder if you are interested.
Do people actually reflect on their own views and retract them or revise them in light of new information or perspectives?
What part does external support that is unrelated to the validity of a view impact whether that view is maintained?
Is questioning your own position a sign of weakness or strength? Can a person admit they were wrong and be seen as stronger for that?
Is there a difference to the application, amount, extent, and quality of self-examination between groups that hold views based on evidence as opposed to those based purely on faith?
In relation to this, what does having an open mind mean? How does it impact self-examination?
Do people actually reflect on their own views and retract them or revise them in light of new information or perspectives?
What part does external support that is unrelated to the validity of a view impact whether that view is maintained?
Is questioning your own position a sign of weakness or strength? Can a person admit they were wrong and be seen as stronger for that?
Is there a difference to the application, amount, extent, and quality of self-examination between groups that hold views based on evidence as opposed to those based purely on faith?
In relation to this, what does having an open mind mean? How does it impact self-examination?