leov
Well-Known Member
To whom? His sister?
"I shall be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.”To whom? His sister?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
To whom? His sister?
"I shall be a fugitive and a wanderer on the earth, and whoever finds me will kill me.”To whom? His sister?
Obviously I didn't mean we came from a species of monkey that is still on earth. It would have been an ancient ancestor that evolved..Is a man the result of evolution from a primate ? They have much in common, but they have many differences as well.
Science once told us that Neanderthals weren´t human, but, of course they were.
I don´t believe your ancestors were baboons, but it is a good bet some were Neanderthalś.
You will have to decide what makes a human, and explain why, if modern people came from primates, none of the alleged line of intermediary forms no longer exist.
Wolves exist, dogs exist, coyoteś exist, dingoś exist, and they can all interbreed and produce offspring.
If you were so inclined, which primate species is there that you could mate with and have offspring ?
I never thought of the BB as a force fit but it definitely was a powerful force.Things like how genesis is about the big bang is a force
fit...........
I see this far too often, and it always, always involves the person who thinks so leaving out something rather important about evolution --- time, and lots and lots and lots of generations! If you had physically lived for a million years or so, you yourself could have seen evolution happen in nature.It depends little on what is meant with evolution. If it means all species have evolved from single species, I don’t believe it, because if it would be true, it could be seen in nature easily. We don’t see it in nature, therefore I don’t believe it.
I've never taken that poll. No one from a poll has ever asked what I believe.. lolWhat basis do you believe this? Every year or so, Gallup does a poll on the beliefs of people, and a majority of people believe in God AND evolution.
As I said, Perhaps you still believe in a flat earth.
Avoiding my comment is not deflection?Deflection...
Even when they're wrong?
Wow, what a nasty post. What are we who come from the lowest rungs of society ?Fundamentalism of every sort draws its strength from the lowest
rungs of society.
Monkeys are still here, why not that ancient ancestor ?Obviously I didn't mean we came from a species of monkey that is still on earth. It would have been an ancient ancestor that evolved..
No I don't, actually, because as far as I know, there is no God. So you just made up something about me and posted it which is not true. That's not nice.Most accept it from two sentences and then never question it.
That's your idea, your thinking. You believe yourself more capable and more knowledgeable than God.
I don't believe in the bible. Neanderthals were equally intelligent with homo sapiens. In which case they will be judged too, no? So they'd be people. Was Adam a neanderthal?In Scripture I find Adam was the first man - Genesis 2:7,19.
In other words, what we can learn from the Bible is that Adam was the first man.- Luke 3:38 B.
Monkeys came after..Monkeys are still here, why not that ancient ancestor ?
Because they evolved into humans...Monkeys are still here, why not that ancient ancestor ?
It's true to me.No I don't, actually, because as far as I know, there is no God. So you just made up something about me and posted it which is not true. That's not nice.
The Qur'an said the universe is expanding 1400 years ago.At one time the general consensus was that the universe was static. Then, as our tools got better, some proposed that the universe was expanding. There were long debates about it. There was extensive research. You know the results.
Species evolve over time. Even "living fossils" are usually different from their ancestors and could almost certainly not breed with them. The creationist favorite example is that of the Coelacanth, but that is not even a species, or genus, or even a family. Coelacanth is an entire order of fish. The coelacanth found today, though related, is definitely different from the various species that existed when it lived in shallow seas:Monkeys are still here, why not that ancient ancestor ?
Is a man the result of evolution from a primate ? They have much in common, but they have many differences as well.
Science once told us that Neanderthals weren´t human, but, of course they were.
I don´t believe your ancestors were baboons, but it is a good bet some were Neanderthalś.
You will have to decide what makes a human, and explain why, if modern people came from primates, none of the alleged line of intermediary forms no longer exist.
Wolves exist, dogs exist, coyoteś exist, dingoś exist, and they can all interbreed and produce offspring.
If you were so inclined, which primate species is there that you could mate with and have offspring ?
The Qur'an said the universe is expanding 1400 years ago.
I believe evolution is the best explanation we have for the existence of humans - and God.Just want to know if you believe in one and not the other then just your reason behind it.
Monkeys are still here, why not that ancient ancestor ?
I like that. Very cool!I believe evolution is the best explanation we have for the existence of humans - and God.