For one, you could hide in a mailbox.A mailbox would do.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
For one, you could hide in a mailbox.A mailbox would do.
Your major advantage is attached to your neck. Self righteous zealots acting on emotion have less of a tendency to think. That could be turned into an advantage.
I am unsure how good it would be for him to talk with someone that has had experience with applications.As I have mentioned elsewhere, I have an uncle who was caught up
in the cultural revolution.
Those young men did unspeakable things.
He was so dedicated true believer, he never has
gotten over it.
Too bad I cant get him and the pure philosopher
together, they could denounce capitalist roaders
happily ever after.
That seems to echo Milton's claim that social/political freedom and market freedom are different sides of the same coin, and that you cant have one without the othet. Asides from numerous examples that suggest otherwise, thats really a dangerous claim because there just dies not seem amy correlation between social freedoms and market freedoms. But we have so many examples where market freedom prevails while social freedom does not (the whole of American history, really). And it gets reinforced by the idea that spending our money is democracy and as much control over things that regular people can have. Again, its a bad idea, and there are numerous examples where the people had to go to the state to restrict damaging aspects of market freedom.Not all of them are the result of capitalism and market economics or easily solved by those conditions either. The problem is partly time. I have read arguments that market economics would have eventually eliminated racism against black Americans, but it would have been a long time in doing it.
Yes: it is an ezample of how political governance and economic systems are not inherently intwinded. The benefits of one do not necessarily overlap into the other. And its why it is the state that allows for communes, as capitalism doesn't grant freedoms beyond market freedoms. There is of course some overlap, but clearly not enough to where we can say the market gives or protects social freedoms.hat was government, not capitalism
Id probably be one of the first ones up to be purged.Yep, they'd have lil Audie hanging from a lampost.
A table lamp might suffice.
(I've heard that her significant other is Stuart Little.)
I don't think that this is particularly accurate.Once again ultimately it is not Walmart that is the victim of these thefts. They will just raise their prices. The victims are the poor people that do not steal that end up paying for the thefts of others.
Teachers also get stuff done, and they do it with less and for less. Doctors get stuff done, they save lives, and yet Wall Street investors often make more. Farmers ust their *** day in and day out, and they are sinking and killing themselves. We'll manage just fine without just as we have done without lords and nobles, just as we also were after we told the church they dont get to run the state or show anymore like they are used to. We'll be just fine without people making tons of money because they enough extra cash to throw around.I dont intend this as rude or a put down but-
I kind of dont think you have real world experience
in investing.
I dont mean mutual funds or bonds.
I mean the people who conceive of a project,
bust their butt working out the thousand details
and get it done!
They wont do that for "equal pay" and nocommittee
of non professional will get it done either.
I don't think that this is particularly accurate.
Wal-Mart charges as much as they can, profitably. Wal-Mart wouldn't lower it's prices if theft went away, they'd dump their security and keep their same prices, and make a bunch more money than they already do.
Why would they "pass the savings along" if they don't have to?
Tom
Teachers also get stuff done, and they do it with less and for less. Doctors get stuff done, they save lives, and yet Wall Street investors often make more. Farmers ust their *** day in and day out, and they are sinking and killing themselves. We'll manage just fine without just as we have done without lords and nobles, just as we also were after we told the church they dont get to run the state or show anymore like they are used to. We'll be just fine without people making tons of money because they enough extra cash to throw around.
Don’t let tendencies get obscured in the possibilities.Yes: it is an ezample of how political governance and economic systems are not inherently intwinded. The benefits of one do not necessarily overlap into the other. And its why it is the state that allows for communes, as capitalism doesn't grant freedoms beyond market freedoms. There is of course some overlap, but clearly not enough to where we can say the market gives or protects social freedoms.
I didnt say the kings. I said the Nobles and Lords, who were basically nobodies with a fancy title living off the sweat and blood of others. Someone does need to be in charge, but no one is ever as important as they think or claim.Ok, that is how you see things. It is not realistic
to think some doctors and teachers
will get together to build a hospital or office
building, or an oil tanker,
if that is what you are thimking.
Kings n nobles btw are government, not business.
I didnt say the kings. I said the Nobles and Lords, who were basically nobodies with a fancy title living off the sweat and blood of others. Someone does need to be in charge, but no one is ever as important as they think or claim.
Edison I consider more a thief than anything. A "great inventor" who actually invented little of what bears his name.Regardless tho of how inflated or humble the
self inage of say, Edison or Ford, they got industries
going where no committee ever would.
Pretty much. They can work like the rest of us rather than riding waves of wealth passing from one generation to the next or tax exploits.Still, sure. Who is not to see the injustice of
hereditary estates, luxury wrung from the sweat
and misery of workers.
Add in the priests while you are about it.
Parasites!
Edison I consider more a thief than anything. A "great inventor" who actually invented little of what bears his name.
Pretty much. They can work like the rest of us rather than riding waves of wealth passing from one generation to the next or tax exploits.
Criticizing Edison is racist now.Edison I consider more a thief than anything. A "great inventor" who actually invented little of what bears his name.
Pretty much. They can work like the rest of us rather than riding waves of wealth passing from one generation to the next or tax exploits.
Criticizing Edison is racist now.
Fixed it for you so you won't be racist.Edison was racist. Did he inventblackAfrican American light??
That is one tough card game you have been in today.Criticizing Edison is racist now.