leov
Well-Known Member
Neil deGrasse Tyson: we don't understand the most fundamental aspects of our universe
Looks like not too much...
Looks like not too much...
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
We know a lot, but we do not know everything. If we did, there would be no need for science or inquiry of any kind.Neil deGrasse Tyson: we don't understand the most fundamental aspects of our universe
Looks like not too much...
Ancient concept: The more we know the greater border with unknown. There is no end.We know a lot, but we do not know everything. If we did, there would be no need for science or inquiry of any kind.
Our friends from atheist side would ask you to prove your claim.but I am certain....
there is a God
I am not ready to discuss that information.Neil deGrasse Tyson and many of today's cosmologists don't even grasp the basics principles of relativity
That we do not know something does not mean we cannot learn about that something and come to know much or all there is to know of it.Ancient concept: The more we know the greater border with unknown. There is no end.
Of course. Also, a question lingers in my mind: If we know only some 5% of universe do we always make correct conclusions?That we do not know something does not mean we cannot learn about that something and come to know much or all there is to know of it.
No. But we have to make the best conclusions we can based on the evidence we have. That is why scientific explanations and conclusions are tentative. They allow for the discovery of new information that could result in previous explanations and conclusions being tossed out. However, there are no valid conclusions or explanations that can be based on objects that have no conceptual substance.Of course. Also, a question lingers in my mind: If we know only some 5% of universe do we always make correct conclusions?
and in reply.....as from the beginning of my membership....Our friends from atheist side would ask you to prove your claim.
100% agree. I posted this for atheists to take critical look at base of our knowledge.and in reply.....as from the beginning of my membership....
there will not be a fingerprint, a photo, an equation or a repeatable experiment
there will no proving
but science believes in things not proven
dark energy
dark matter
can't prove it.....but we are CERTAIN it's all there
somewhere
Of course. Also, a question lingers in my mind: If we know only some 5% of universe do we always make correct conclusions?
100% agree. I posted this for atheists to take critical look at base of our knowledge.
Scientists observe and create hypotheses. Before I. Newton, things fell down. Apples falls from trees. 1. Theist - “God made it go down!”. 2. - Scientist - Apples fall when no longer attached to their stems. Perhaps there is a force, that we all see every day across the planet, that makes things move toward the center of the planet. Because that is what we see. Let’s call that force......”gravity”. Now if only we could come up with a way to measure and calculate how strong it is and what generates it. Hmmmmmm.....”and in reply.....as from the beginning of my membership....
there will not be a fingerprint, a photo, an equation or a repeatable experiment
there will be no proving
but science believes in things not proven
dark energy
dark matter
can't prove it.....but we are CERTAIN it's all there
somewhere
Well obvioisly no. I think we bumble along, and through the process of elimination of making every wrong turn we make the correct turn, only to take one step and proceed to repeat process!!!! I think inspite of ourselves should be a philisophical topic!!!Of course. Also, a question lingers in my mind: If we know only some 5% of universe do we always make correct conclusions?
Nature doesnt exist? Thats wierd.....i live on the oregon coast what the hell is it a virtual thing? The ocean isnt real?We don't know jack ****, but we have enough common sense to know that God doesn't exist
"God did it," just means that universe operates on Natural Law basisScientists observe and create hypotheses. Before I. Newton, things fell down. Apples falls from trees. 1. Theist - “God made it go down!”. 2. - Scientist - Apples fall when no longer attached to their stems. Perhaps there is a force, that we all see every day across the planet, that makes things move toward the center of the planet. Because that is what we see. Let’s call that force......”gravity”. Now if only we could come up with a way to measure and calculate how strong it is and what generates it. Hmmmmmm.....”
Today (and before), the measured expansion rate of the galaxies and star systems we see around us does not exactly correspond to the masses (and thus gravitational pulls of the visible matter in the same volume of space). 1. Theists - “God did it! No need for your mumbo-jumbo “science” malarkey! 2. Scientists - “There must be more to it than just normal matter and its corresponding gravitational field generation. Because that is what we see. Let’s call this yet undefined power/material “dark energy/matter”. Now if only we could come up with a way to measure and calculate how strong it is and what generates it. Hmmmmmmm......”