• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Renounced my Gnosticism

The_Fisher_King

Trying to bring myself ever closer to Allah
Premium Member
Gnosticism in the purest sense is personal Revelation in priority over scripture as in the 'Whirling Dervishes branch of the Sufis. The Sufis vary, but are to an extent gnositc.

I'm not sure that was quite the view of the early Gnostic sects of the early centuries CE. That was the kind of Gnosticism that I previously espoused.
 

The_Fisher_King

Trying to bring myself ever closer to Allah
Premium Member
I believe the early gnostics relied heavily on personal Revelation from God.

Some did, perhaps. Not least perhaps the founders of the different sects. But they had their sometimes complex cosmologies that went with following a particular sect's founder and in some cases at least, they also had their scriptures.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
Some did, perhaps. Not least perhaps the founders of the different sects. But they had their sometimes complex cosmologies that went with following a particular sect's founder and in some cases at least, they also had their scriptures.

Some wrote them down and they became scripture as in the Book of Revelation. In one way the claim of Gnosticism is 'special knowledge' that one claims through a relationship with God, to receive and reveal if they choose to do so, that others, maybe no one else, do not have.In Christianity churches like the Pentecostals, the founders of Quakers believe that thus special knowledge is revealed to everyone who sincerely believes.
 
Last edited:

The_Fisher_King

Trying to bring myself ever closer to Allah
Premium Member
In one way the claim of Gnosticism is 'special knowledge' that one claims through a relationship with God, to receive and reveal if they choose to do so, that others, maybe no one else, do not have.

That sounds like the claim that many a founder of a particular religion or tradition or a denomination within a tradition has made - are you saying that all such are Gnostics?
 

MonkeyFire

Well-Known Member
In my religion knowledge is a living thing and the embodiememt of the fallen angel of light. Not to be confused with satan the angel and demon of hatred, Lucifer was and still is a prominent angel who assist God and Jesus in helping mankind. One day he became aware of hell after an eternity in heaven perfectly and things like existence and perception became fallen. Because Lucifer knew all things all along, but still allowed for hell to come into existence causing st. Michael to endure the transgression as FAITH himself suffered, so until hell goes out of existence and the fallen angel proves he can know without being evil to God he must remain away from the rest of us.
 
Last edited:

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
That sounds like the claim that many a founder of a particular religion or tradition or a denomination within a tradition has made - are you saying that all such are Gnostics?

Gnostics usually do not claim to be manifestations of God as Jesus Christ, Mohammud, and Baha'u'llah, but there are some who claim to be 'prophets' withing the context of Christianity, such as Mary Baker Eddy founder of Christian Science. Commonly call 'metaphysical religious' movements of the 19th century in the USA and Europe.
 

The_Fisher_King

Trying to bring myself ever closer to Allah
Premium Member
Gnostics usually do not claim to be manifestations of God as Jesus Christ, Mohammud, and Baha'u'llah, but there are some who claim to be 'prophets' withing the context of Christianity, such as Mary Baker Eddy founder of Christian Science. Commonly call 'metaphysical religious' movements of the 19th century in the USA and Europe.

So you're saying we can't necessarily define someone as a Gnostic, even if they make the same claims to special knowledge through a direct relationship with God that Gnostics do (on your above definition)?
 
Top