This is a good example, where one could say that science got it wrong, if you play the same word game. I know of no human queen who has directly given birth to thousands of her subjects. Why did the atheist scientists call the queen ant a queen, when this ant's reproductive prowess is totally unlike any human queen in recorded history?
The short answer is the term queen ant was used as a descriptive term to help students remember the official biology cataloging, easier. It is was not intended to be taken as a literal parallel to human queens. It is good not to read too much into this.
If you ever watched a locust eat (se below) they use their two smaller front legs, like arms with hands, to grasp their food. Again you are assuming scientific cataloging standards is an objective bottom line, and therefore locust eat with their front legs and feet, even if the front legs look different and are used like arms. Before humans walked upright, did they eat with the front legs feet or with their arms? There is no real answer, other than using subjective convention.
Another interesting insect is the praying mantis. This is another insect with four legs and two powerful arms, or six legs, depending on your cataloging POV.