Jim
Nets of Wonder
Here’s what happened. I saw Shoghi Effendi saying that Bahá’u’lláh is the tenth avatar, and I found out that in some Hindu stories the tenth avatar is Kalki, who comes at the end of the Kali Yuga, to make way for the Satya Yuga. Bahá’u’lláh’s description of the time we’re in looks to me like the descriptions that I’ve seen of when Kalki would come.
I saw Shoghi Effendi saying that Bahá’u’lláh is a manifestation of Krishna, and I found a webpage that I thought was written by a Hindu, saying that it’s actually Krishna rather than Vishnu who is the source of all incarnations. The arguments from Hindu scriptures looked reasonable to me. If Bahá’u’lláh is a manifestation of Krishna, then in my understanding all the person’s that He calls “Manifestations” are Manifestations of Krishna. I went from there to saying that they are all avatars, but now I see that I would need to do more research on that. I would also need to do more research to see if it’s true that there are no Hindus who think of Hindu avatars as avatars of Krishna.
I saw Shoghi Effendi saying that Bahá’u’lláh is a manifestation of Krishna, and I found a webpage that I thought was written by a Hindu, saying that it’s actually Krishna rather than Vishnu who is the source of all incarnations. The arguments from Hindu scriptures looked reasonable to me. If Bahá’u’lláh is a manifestation of Krishna, then in my understanding all the person’s that He calls “Manifestations” are Manifestations of Krishna. I went from there to saying that they are all avatars, but now I see that I would need to do more research on that. I would also need to do more research to see if it’s true that there are no Hindus who think of Hindu avatars as avatars of Krishna.