Augustus
…
I already gave you one (The Gergen message) which you ridiculed. I have no doubt that you are capable of ridiculing others. That's what the GOP would try to do, obviously.
I was pointing out that not having a reputation for scrupulous honesty didn't seem to overly harm the 2 term presidents Nixon, Reagan and Clinton.
If that the best the GOP can come up with, they're in trouble.
As noted, Trump won't be running on 'I'm less bad than the alternative' ticket.
You just gave a list that I read in a few minutes. It might take a little longer than that for a candidate cover those but it would leave plenty of time to ask simple questions like: Would you trust Donald Trump to keep his part of the bargain in a business deal? Since a candidate doesn't have to prove Trump is dishonest, he can add a different line like this to every speech with no other explanation. Would you want your President to be untrustworthy, Augustus?
Is Trump dishonest in a way that actually matters though? Abstract messages that have minimal emotional impact don't win elections. Folk don't really care if he tells a few fibs if he is perceived as being better on the economy, national security, etc. than his opponent.
The questions of trust that really matter for moderate voters are: do you trust them on 1. the economy 2. healthcare 3. national security
Since most people lack the willingness or ability to make systematic judgements on these issues, they will go with who they feel is best, which is largely based on the emotional resonance of message.
Now, if you can link trust to, for example, healthcare then it becomes an emotive issue. But as trust is comparative, not absolute, this is only a corollary to your 'more trustworthy' vision on healthcare.