Why are predudices so dangerous?
This topic is raised as it appears most of the conlict in the world and apparent in RF debates, comes about by predudices built on many aspects of life.
I see that is a sound and fair comment.
The base human rights one should use when posting on this topic is the United Nations 'UNIVERSAL DECLARATION
OF HUMAN RIGHTS'.
It can be read here;
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Wikisource, the free online library
The Preamble starts;
"Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,..."
Article 1 states;
"...All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood...."
So as all have these rights, it is should be obvious that what we need to address is actions against those rights. The danger is whan we do not act.
So now we can ask, what would be a view that is based on Predudice?
How can humanity act to ensure all have those rights, ensuring predudice is not the motivating factor?
Regards Tony
This topic is raised as it appears most of the conlict in the world and apparent in RF debates, comes about by predudices built on many aspects of life.
I see that is a sound and fair comment.
The base human rights one should use when posting on this topic is the United Nations 'UNIVERSAL DECLARATION
OF HUMAN RIGHTS'.
It can be read here;
Universal Declaration of Human Rights - Wikisource, the free online library
The Preamble starts;
"Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,..."
Article 1 states;
"...All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood...."
So as all have these rights, it is should be obvious that what we need to address is actions against those rights. The danger is whan we do not act.
So now we can ask, what would be a view that is based on Predudice?
How can humanity act to ensure all have those rights, ensuring predudice is not the motivating factor?
Regards Tony
Last edited: