We can show that based on what is prophesied it has come to pass, and we can historically show the data, plus the the results...[/QUOTE]
Unfortunately, when the book itself is the sole proof of the fulfilled prophecy, we cannot class that prophecy as fulfilled. It's like the creator of batman saying the joker is gonna die, then a later contributer writes that the joker dies. The original writer wasn't a prophet - the later contributor was finishing a story. It doesn't say anything about the truth of the matter, or whether batman or the joker actually exist.
When you reference historical evidence - I've yet to see anything solid. Most of its dredged up by 'historians' (I use that term lightly) who've set out to prove what they already believe. Other evidence which shows certain things existed, does nothing to prove anything about prophecy - if I was to say a tornado was to rip through london on Friday at 3pm, and it does, is the more likely explanation a lucky guess, or divine inspiration? Because if it's inspiration, you'd have to prove the existence of the divine. Which, unfortunately, you can't without reference to the Bible, which wouldnt be proof anyway - bringing us back to square one.