Main stream news, which collectively reaches the majority of people, has a record of 90% negative news against Trump. This has an accumulative impact on people who memorize, repeat and gossip, but who don't do research to determine the truth.
How about we run a test? We will ask a volunteer, from the forum community, to be the scapegoat in this test. The rest of members will make up the worse things we can say about the volunteer, until we achieve about 90% negative opinions of the volunteer, over the next year. We will mimic main stream news and the volunteer will attempt to defect the negative attacks.
We do this along with a running survey, for newcomers and visitors, where we allow them can express their opinion of the volunteer, to see who many will mimic the constant 90% negative criticism.
We will also do a side-by-side, where we have a second volunteer, but we give the second volunteer 90% positive opinions, to see if the visitors also mimic that. If this works as I suggest, everyone will learn the basics of propaganda 1.0 as function of gullibility.
We could also have a third question category which determines how many visitors will sense 90% bullies and 90% bootlickers, even without the ability to do research into the volunteers to test the accusations and options. These are the most perceptive people against which propaganda is not affective.