And sarcasm too.
What?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Computers can be satisfied in many ways. Mr. X can prove to the computer that he is Mr. Y. Computers are not omniscient.When I registered for this forum or perhaps it was another forum, I had to do a captcha test to prove I wasn't a spam bot: I passed this test; which proves I'm human instead of a computer or robot.
Ahh, self awareness, a sure sign.
Sign of what i do not know but its sure
gentle correction: it's self un-awareness.
But you are correct. it is a sure sign. that IAMNOTBOT.
Also, it demonstrates abstract detailed knowledge of a shared interest between @dingdoa and I. But, dingdoa and I don't know each other. So the that adds to the layers of improbabiluty that AI would answer the question correctly. it is on-topic, highly obscure, and funny. Which also adds to the layers of imporbabiity that AI would guess the correct answer.
But... admittedly... now THE GOOGLE knows the answer so that one along with almost all the question answer conversational tests are single use only. One-And-Done.
Ahh, self awareness, a sure sign.
Sign of what i do not know but its sure
More Zen... you are really really good at this.
But are you aware of how good you are at it?
Which is more zen...
And unawareness is a strong sign of not-bot-i-tude.
I'm kinda thinking you're going to win this...
just by being you...
tres simple, pas facile
tres simple, pas facile
Most Honorable @dingdao,
Please consider:
Very strong evidence of not-bot-itude is embarrassment.
Exhibit A:
Please refer to this thread link below, where I accidentally and unintentionally said that @ChristineM was....
drum roll.....
easy. en-francais
and it was embarrassing.
Here's a link to evidence I, Daniel, dybmh, made an emabarassing faux-pas ( see what I did there? with the french? )
the exchange starts on post#11, then continues in posts#:12,15,17,19 and concludes on 21.
dybmh asks ChristineM the title of her Autobiolgraphy
If you believe that I was actually embarrassed... +1% PrettyPlease
mercy buckets, ma'amAt least 2.1357596.% is deserved
Since we're there, what does a chameleon see when it looks in a mirror?I have admit @ChristineM 's zen-like approach is way way lower effort than mine.
I kinda think she may end up being the winner.
just sayin
@dingdao, demonstration of humility, +1%?
mercy buckets, ma'am
You're fibbing...96% I'm starting to lose track of the scores.
99%gentle correction: it's self un-awareness.
But you are correct. it is a sure sign. that IAMNOTBOT.
Also, it demonstrates abstract detailed knowledge of a shared interest between @dingdao and I. But, dingdao and I don't know each other. So the that adds to the layers of improbability that AI would answer the question correctly. it is on-topic, highly obscure, and funny. Which also adds to the layers of improbability that AI would guess the correct answer.
But... admittedly... now THE GOOGLE knows the answer so that one along with almost all the question answer conversational tests are single use only. One-And-Done.
OK....