Science is a false God

[Maximilian]

Which god?

Our Creator, Jehovah God.

 

[Maximilian]

Who are you to dare condemn anyone’s moral values???? You’re gonna defend slavery huh?

Can you hear yourself? You're being irrational.

How does any of that answer my simple query?

 

[Maximilian]

So you got no prob with killing everyone but the virgins,
but dare to challenge anyone but maybe a werewolf,
on morality???

Tell me it aint so.

If you're still on Numbers 31, again, I put to you, why should God tolerate the evil?

 

[JChnsc19]

On what objective moral basis can you even dare to make such an evaluation?

Numbers 31:17-18, Deuteronomy 21

 

[columbus]

Science is subjective? So like would you say we all believe in differing levels of gravity? You could think subjectively that gravity isn’t real & jump off a 10 story building & have no injuries because I’m your mind that’s how gravity subjectively works? Is that what you mean?

Feel free to go back and reread my post.
Then, when you don't find the word "subjective" ask yourself

Am I capable of distinguishing between abstract and subjective? Or, should I sit and learn at the feet of my elders.
Trust me, it's an important question for you to ask.
Tom

 

[Maximilian]

Numbers 31:17-18, Deuteronomy 21

You're still not making any sense. How does this answer my simple query?

 

[JChnsc19]

I hear myself loud n clear

You're not making any sense. God’s laws and regulations for the ancient Israelites, such as the detection as well as management of illnesses and the great importance of clean water lay bare your sophism. Preventive stipulations dictated the management as well as disposal of dead bodies. Quarantines served as barriers against the spread of infectious diseases. Sewage disposal by burying excreta was a hygienic law very far ahead of the times. (Deuteronomy 23:12-14) The necessity of regular baths along with the laundering of clothing were also rewarding requirements within that nation’s code of laws.

the Bible was super helpful on detection & management of illnesses. Like Jesus telling people to wash their hands before they eat as in Mark, right?

 

[JChnsc19]

Feel free to go back and reread my post.
Then, when you don't find the word "subjective" ask yourself

Am I capable of distinguishing between abstract and subjective? Or, should I sit and learn at the feet of my elders.
Trust me, it's an important question for you to ask.
Tom

I reread it & saw the same thing I saw the 1st time - science is abstract concepts that appear objective but they’re not.

 

[Maximilian]

I hear myself loud n clear

the Bible was super helpful on detection & management of illnesses. Like Jesus telling people to wash their hands before they eat as in Mark, right?

Did you read Deuteronomy 23?

 

[JChnsc19]

Can you hear yourself? You're being irrational.

How does any of that answer my simple query?

Well to get technical I guess you’ll have to define god, and then demonstrate its existence and /or the validity of your holy book then we can go from there

 

[JChnsc19]

Did you read Deuteronomy 23?

I’ve read the whole bible many times

 

[Maximilian]

Well to get technical I guess you’ll have to define god, and then demonstrate its existence and /or the validity of your holy book then we can go from there

Just as soon as you're done answering my question here: Science is a false God

After all, if you refuse to address my questions why should I tend to yours?

 

[Maximilian]

I’ve read the whole bible many times

Then you can answer your own question

 

[JChnsc19]

Then you can answer your own question

I don’t believe in your god so not really. What made you pick the god of the Bible? Why aren’t you arguing for allah? Or khrishna? Or the Zoroastrians? Or Zeus & Thor?

 

[JChnsc19]

Just as soon as you're done answering my question here: Science is a false God

After all, if you refuse to address my questions why should I tend to yours?

My answer is I don’t see any evidence for any gods. I would have to see a sound, reasonable, evidence based argument from someone who believes science is a god first to be able to say why it is a false one. I’ve examined arguments posited about other gods, I’ve never seen an argument that science is a god.

 

[Maximilian]

My answer is I don’t see any evidence for any gods. I would have to see a sound, reasonable, evidence based argument from someone who believes science is a god first to be able to say why it is a false one. I’ve examined arguments posited about other gods, I’ve never seen an argument that science is a god.

Nice deflection but I didn't ask you that. What I'm still waiting for you to answer is, "On what objective moral basis do you dare condemn anyone's moral values?"

 

[Maximilian]

I don’t believe in your god so not really. What made you pick the god of the Bible? Why aren’t you arguing for allah? Or khrishna? Or the Zoroastrians? Or Zeus & Thor?

Indirect evidence is frequently and consistently relied upon to ascertain the reality of our world. As a case in point, it's long been widely used to show that our Sun generates power via nuclear fusion, hydrogen is present in it or that our planet features an iron core. In like manner, the fact that there are dozens upon dozens of fulfilled Bible prophecies constitutes probative evidence of the existence of its author, Jehovah God.

This fact is, by far, the most compelling logical reason why millions upon millions of rational people today the world over only accept the Bible as the Inspired Word of Jehovah God. Simply no other book – religious or not – comes with such illustrious prominence. Because it's impossible for any person to foresee with complete precision what's sure to occur from one hour to the next, there's no two ways about it: Bible prophecies are not of natural origin. I kindly invite you to examine for yourself various examples of these specific and accurately fulfilled prophecies.

 

[blü 2]

Many who say there is no God because science can't prove it actually worship science.

The problem is that no one can tell science what science is supposed to be looking for, out there in reality.

Which brings us to the central problem: there's no coherent concept of a real god. All we find is imaginary gods, which of course can be anything and everything we want them to be, except real.

There isn't even a coherent concept of what 'godness' is, the quality that when two real claimants say they're god, the actual god has and the false god lacks.

But please correct me if that's wrong. What definition of 'God' will let us determine whether any real candidate is God, or a god, or not?

 

[Audie]

I hear myself loud n clear

the Bible was super helpful on detection & management of illnesses. Like Jesus telling people to wash their hands before they eat as in Mark, right?

I hear myself loud n clear

the Bible was super helpful on detection & management of illnesses. Like Jesus telling people to wash their hands before they eat as in Mark, right?

Dont forget using a rock to cure snakebite.

 

[atanu]

Nah. It only shows that anyone looking for a semantic
"gotcha" can concoct one. It is a shabby practice unworthy
of almost anyone.

Pointing out that science is not the ‘doer’ is not a ‘gotcha’.