Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But chicken evolved from some other animal. So the chicken egg certainly came after the chicken could be called a chicken. If it wasn't a chicken neither was it a chicken egg if there was no one there to decide that the baby inside will become a chicken in which case someone might call it a chicken egg, but not an egg of a chicken. What about the rooster?That there can't be a egg without a chicken but the chicken can come from alwaysbefore (as opposed to everafter) in heaven. If that's not true it's a endless cycle of chicken and egg forever alpha and omega. No chicken no egg... no egg no chicken.
the spirit and the waters from genesis 1:1-3 is very reminiscent of an ovum and sperm scenario.But chicken evolved from some other animal. So the chicken egg certainly came after the chicken could be called a chicken. If it wasn't a chicken neither was it a chicken egg if there was no one there to decide that the baby inside will become a chicken in which case someone might call it a chicken egg, but not an egg of a chicken. What about the rooster?
thank you for the hint and clarification. unfortunately we sometimes need a reference point for association; especially when the ocular sense tell us that it is separate from us.The question implies time as a linear concept. "First" may have no relevance to the question.