Rethinking Evolution
Interesting article. Around the mid 1800's Darwin rediscovered what originally was self evident to everyone, including dogs that life is interconnected. Dawrin didnt discovered he mearly rediscovered something.
His narrative about life interconnected that we call evolution is narrative about life interconnected in a simplistic mechanicalistic interpretation. That narrative is always open for revision regardless it is not a fixed narrative nor is is it predictible how that narrative plays out over time in human expression.
So since a dog understands life interconnected i am curious as to why some find that so difficult in religious terms. St francis called it "family of god" 800 years ago. Is st francis that difdicult?
As a theology major there have been a few upon hearing what my degree is in, want to mention evolution. I always respond "oh evolution a dog understands that, seems like a cultural problem" . They respond back "oh its much more complex than that" which i respond "oh you are proposing that evolution is created by a primate brain? Wow powerful brain"
Life interconnected is self evident no science needed like gravity. If that isnt clear religiously then that religion has a serious problem. In christianity it means its not about the text but fantasies projected onto the text. That is creationism and intelligent design both fantasies.
In regards to science the narrative evolution is not objective but subjective and always changing and will change in completely unpredictible ways. The simple reason its subjective, is because the topic life interconnected is objective and it determines the science narrative evolution. The narrative is always subjective to the topic life interconnected REGARDLESS. flip that backwards which is common and normal, we have nonsense being called "scientific" and its not.
What we understand today will be radically different off in the future, especially in context to life interconnected, or as st francis called it "family of god"
Interesting article. Around the mid 1800's Darwin rediscovered what originally was self evident to everyone, including dogs that life is interconnected. Dawrin didnt discovered he mearly rediscovered something.
His narrative about life interconnected that we call evolution is narrative about life interconnected in a simplistic mechanicalistic interpretation. That narrative is always open for revision regardless it is not a fixed narrative nor is is it predictible how that narrative plays out over time in human expression.
So since a dog understands life interconnected i am curious as to why some find that so difficult in religious terms. St francis called it "family of god" 800 years ago. Is st francis that difdicult?
As a theology major there have been a few upon hearing what my degree is in, want to mention evolution. I always respond "oh evolution a dog understands that, seems like a cultural problem" . They respond back "oh its much more complex than that" which i respond "oh you are proposing that evolution is created by a primate brain? Wow powerful brain"
Life interconnected is self evident no science needed like gravity. If that isnt clear religiously then that religion has a serious problem. In christianity it means its not about the text but fantasies projected onto the text. That is creationism and intelligent design both fantasies.
In regards to science the narrative evolution is not objective but subjective and always changing and will change in completely unpredictible ways. The simple reason its subjective, is because the topic life interconnected is objective and it determines the science narrative evolution. The narrative is always subjective to the topic life interconnected REGARDLESS. flip that backwards which is common and normal, we have nonsense being called "scientific" and its not.
What we understand today will be radically different off in the future, especially in context to life interconnected, or as st francis called it "family of god"