False, Psychology,sociology, biology and history do not support your one-sided extreme assertion.
Compatibilism - Bibliography - PhilPapers - Good beginning tounderstand compatibilism and alternatives to extreme views of hard determinism or libertarian free will.
"Compatibilist views of free will hold that free will is compatible with causal determinism. Classical compatibilists argued that determinism does not entail that agents lack alternative possibilities. They often advanced conditional accounts of alternatives (eg, the agent can do otherwise if, were she to want to do otherwise, she would). In more recent times, compatibilists have often denied that we need a power to do otherwise for freedom. Most contemporary compatibilists hold that free will is compatible with but does not require determinism. So-called Hobartian compatibilists hold that determinism is required for free will."
See also "
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy - McKenna 2008 - is excellent. Though he is not (quite) a compatibilist himself,
Fischer 2007 is a thorough articulation and defence, as is
Haji 2002." referenced in the above.
and . . .
http://www.informationphilosopher.com/books/scandal/Dennett.pdf
The reality is the issue is unresolved conclusively.