That's it!! You can't even articulate the evidence in your own words? All you can do is point to sources that favor your position? But I'm really not surprised you're unable to make the case yourself. I presented an argument, and rather than address its points all you could do is complain that it didn't fit what you claimed should be my "argument's" proper form (a ludicrous ploy to be sure), and allude to others who defend compatibilism. Being my first clue that you were unable defend compatibilism---I'd bet good money that you, like a lot of compatibilists, have never read a thing
against the concept---I decided to give you as much chance as I could to redeem yourself. But alas, you cannot.
What is apparent is that, although you confuse its venue, philosophy, with science, you do recognize the logic of determinism (and good for you
) your personal needs appear to have driven you seek escape by adopting compatibilism. But this isn't an unusual stratagem at all. A lot of people who are uneasy with the fact of determinism latch onto compatibilism to sooth its unnerving implications. So, although I can't blame you for your "choice," your inability to defend it is rather disappointing.
I leave you in the comfort of your compatibilism.
Have a good day.
.