Faithofchristian
Well-Known Member
The Bible implies that Adam was the first biological man—in Genesis 1-5; Deuteronomy 32:8; 1 Chronicles 1:1; Luke 3:38; Romans 5:14; 1 Corinthians 15:22, 45;1 Timothy 2:13 and Jude 1:14. . So, how many parts of the Bible are you willing to concede as being ‘errant’, or in need of ‘reinterpreting’, in order to accommodate the scientifically proven evolutionary history of humans?
As to how do you get Adam in
Genesis 1:1-5.
In Genesis 1:26-27, The male and female here is the 6th day creation of the male and female Genesis 1:31( And the evening and the morning were the 6th day)
Now on the 7th day God rested from his work of creation.
And then on the next day following l, which we call to day, Sunday. God created Adam and Eve on what we call Sunday.
That means Adam and Eve were created two days later, after God created the first male and female on the 6th day and Adam and Eve were created two days later, on what we call Sunday.
What you given in those other books
Deut 32:8, 1 Chronicles 1:1, Luke 3:38,
Romans 5:14, 1 Corinthians 15:22,45.
1 Timothy 2:13, and Jude 1:14.
There's nothing in all those books that you given that says Adam as being the first to be created. Just because your implying the bible as saying Adam as being the first male created, does not make it so.
There's no where in the bible that's written Adam as being the first male created.
Just because people are implying Adam as being the first male created, Does not make it so.
The reason Adam is mention in all those books, is because through the seed line of Adam Christ Jesus is to come thru.
But there's nothing in all those books that you given that's say Adam as being the first male to be created Nor is there anything in all those books that even in the slightest way that indicate's Adam as being the first male to be created.
Your adding things in those books that are not even there.
Show in those books, Where it said, that Adam being the first male created.
It's not there.
Nice try though.
Last edited: