• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Bible - Why Trust It

nPeace

Veteran Member
Why Trust the Bible
Part 3 - Foretells the future accurately.

DANIEL
Writing completed - about 536 B.C.E
Period covered - 618 B.C.E. to about 536 B.C.E.

Authenticity Challenged
Porphyry of Tyre (/ˈpɔːrfəri/; Greek: Πορφύριος, Porphýrios; Arabic: فرفوريوس‎, Furfūriyūs; c. 234 – c. 305 AD) was a Neoplatonic philosopher who was born in Tyre, in the Roman Empire.


Against the Christians (Adversus Christianos)

Porphyry became one of the most able pagan adversaries of Christianity of his day. His aim was not to disprove the substance of Christianity’s teachings but rather the records within which the teachings are communicated.

According to Jerome, Porphyry especially attacked the prophecy of Daniel because Jews and Christians pointed to the historical fulfillment of its prophecies as a decisive argument. But these prophecies, he maintained, were written not by Daniel but by some Jew who in the time of Antiochus Epiphanes (d. 164 B.C.) gathered up the traditions of Daniel's life and wrote a history of recent past events but in the future tense, falsely dating them back to Daniel's time.

Daniel did not predict so much future events as he narrated past ones. Finally what he had told up to Antiochus contained true history; if anything was guessed beyond that point it was false, for he had not known the future. (quoted by Jerome)

The first part of Daniel, with the exception of the dream in Daniel 2, is historic, not prophetic. Porphyry, attacking only the prophetic portion, declares it to be merely a late anonymous narrative of past events, purporting to have been predicted long before by Daniel. Thus Porphyry's scheme was based on the supposed spuriousness of Daniel's prophecies.

Porphyry devised his own interpretation where the third “prophetic kingdom” was Alexander, and assigned the Macedonian Ptolemies and Seleucids to the fourth kingdom. From among these he chose ten kings, making the eleventh to be Antiochus Epiphanes. In this way he threw his main strength against the book of Daniel, recognizing that if this pillar of faith be shaken, the whole structure of prophecy must tremble. If the writer was not Daniel, then he lied on a frightful scale, ascribing to God prophecies which were never uttered, and making claim of miracles that were never wrought. And if Daniel's authorship could be shown to be false, then Christ Himself would be proved to bear witness to an imposter. (Matt. 24: 15.) Porphyry's thesis was adopted by Edward Gibbon, the English deist Anthony Collins, and most Modernist scholars.
Augustine and the 5th-century ecclesiastical historian Socrates of Constantinople, assert that Porphyry was once a Christian.


Challenge Met and Destroyed
The Dead Sea Scrolls prove that the book of Daniel was written prior to the dates asserted.

The Jewish historian Josephus, stated that the prophecies of Daniel were shown to Alexander the Great when he entered Jerusalem. This occurred in about 332 B.C.E., more than 150 years before the Maccabean period.

Josephus says of the event: “When the book of Daniel was shown to him, in which he had declared that one of the Greeks would destroy the empire of the Persians, he believed himself to be the one indicated.” (Jewish Antiquities, XI, 337 [viii, 5])

History also recounts that Alexander bestowed great favors on the Jews, and this is believed to have been because of what Daniel said about him in prophecy.

Daniel's Prophecy Fulfilled - Alexander the Great Comes To Jerusalem
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
Daniel is taken to Babylon.

2 Kings 24:10-16

10 ...servants of King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon came up against Jerusalem, and the city came under siege. 11 King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon came to the city while his servants were laying siege to it.
12 King Jehoiachin of Judah went out to the king of Babylon, along with his mother, his servants, his princes, and his court officials; and the king of Babylon took him captive in the eighth year of his reign. 13 Then he took out from there all the treasures of the house of Jehovah and the treasures of the king’s house. He cut into pieces all the gold utensils that Solʹo·mon the king of Israel had made in the temple of Jehovah. This happened just as Jehovah had foretold. 14 He took into exile all Jerusalem, all the princes, all the mighty warriors, and every craftsman and metalworker — he took 10,000 into exile. No one was left behind except the poorest people of the land. 15 Thus he took Jehoiachin into exile to Babylon; he also led away the king’s mother, the king’s wives, his court officials, and the foremost men of the land, taking them into exile from Jerusalem to Babylon. 16 The king of Babylon also took into exile to Babylon all the warriors, 7,000, as well as 1,000 craftsmen and metalworkers, all of them mighty men and trained for war.

Daniel 1:1-4

1 In the third year of the kingship of King Jehoiakim of Judah, King Nebuchadnezzar of Babylon came to Jerusalem and besieged it. 2 In time Jehovah gave King Jehoiakim of Judah into his hand, along with some of the utensils of the house of the true God, and he brought them to the land of Shiʹnar to the house of his god. He placed the utensils in the treasury of his god. 3 Then the king ordered Ashpenaz his chief court official to bring some of the Israelites, including those of royal and noble descent. 4 They were to be youths without any defect, of good appearance, endowed with wisdom, knowledge, and discernment, and capable of serving in the king’s palace. He was to teach them the writing and the language of the Chaldeans.

King Nebuchadnezzar effectively became world ruler in 607 B.C.E. when Jehovah God allowed him to destroy Jerusalem and its temple. In the second year of Nebuchadnezzar’s reign as world ruler (606/605 B.C.E.), God sent him a terrifying dream.
(Daniel 2:1, 2)

1 In the second year of his kingship, Nebuchadnezzar had a number of dreams, and he was so agitated that he could not sleep. 2 So the king gave the order to summon the magic-practicing priests, the conjurers, the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans to tell the king his dreams. . . .


How could anyone possibly tell someone what they dreamed?
(Daniel 2:10, 11)
10 The Chaldeans answered the king: “There is not a man on earth who is able to do what the king demands, for no great king or governor has asked such a thing of any magic-practicing priest or conjurer or Chaldean. 11 What the king is asking is difficult, and no one exists who could tell the king this except the gods, who do not dwell among mortals.”


(Daniel 2:27, 28)

27 Daniel replied to the king: “None of the wise men, conjurers, magic-practicing priests, or astrologers are able to tell the king the secret that he is asking. 28 But there is a God in the heavens who is a Revealer of secrets, and he has made known to King Nebuchadnezzar what is to happen in the final part of the days. This is your dream, and these are the visions of your head as you lay on your bed:


Daniel 2:31-45
Daniel 7, 8

[GALLERY=media, 8605]prophect by nPeace posted Jul 24, 2018 at 10:52 PM[/GALLERY]



Daniel 8:1 In the third year of the kingship of King Belshazzar, a vision appeared to me, Daniel...

Daniel 8:20-22
20 “The two-horned ram that you saw stands for the kings of Meʹdi·a and Persia. 21The hairy male goat stands for the king of Greece; and the great horn that was between its eyes stands for the first king. 22 As for the horn that was broken, so that four stood up instead of it, there are four kingdoms from his nation that will stand up, but not with his power.



Alexander III of Macedon (20/21 July 356 BC – 10/11 June 323 BC), commonly known as Alexander the Great was a king (basileus) of the ancient Greek kingdom of Macedon and a member of the Argead dynasty.

Alexander was awarded the generalship of Greece and used this authority to launch his father's pan-Hellenic project to lead the Greeks in the conquest of Persia. In 334 BC, he invaded the Achaemenid Empire (Persian Empire) and began a series of campaigns that lasted ten years.
Following the conquest of Anatolia, Alexander broke the power of Persia in a series of decisive battles, most notably the battles of Issus and Gaugamela. He subsequently overthrew Persian King Darius III and conquered the Achaemenid Empire in its entirety. At that point, his empire stretched from the Adriatic Sea to the Indus River.

Ezekiel 26:4, 12
4 They will destroy the walls of Tyre and tear down her towers, and I will scrape away soil and make her a shining, bare rock.
12 They will loot your resources, plunder your merchandise, tear down your walls, and pull down your fine houses; then they will throw your stones and your woodwork and your soil into the water.’



In the following year, 332 BC, he was forced to attack Tyre, which he captured after a long and difficult siege.


The Siege of Tyre was orchestrated by Alexander the Great in 332 BC during his campaigns against the Persians. The Macedonian army was unable to capture the city, which was a strategic coastal base on the Mediterranean Sea, through conventional means because it was on an island and had walls right up to the sea. Alexander responded to this problem by first blockading and besieging Tyre for seven months, and then by building a causeway that allowed him to breach the fortifications.


Alexander died in Babylon in 323 BC, the city that he planned to establish as his capital, without executing a series of planned campaigns that would have begun with an invasion of Arabia. In the years following his death, a series of civil wars tore his empire apart, resulting in the establishment of several states ruled by the Diadochi, Alexander's surviving generals and heirs.



The Diadochi were the rival generals, families, and friends of Alexander the Great who fought for control over his empire after his death in 323 BC. The Wars of the Diadochi mark the beginning of the Hellenistic period from the Mediterranean to the Indus River Valley.

Decline and fall
This division was to last for a century, before the Antigonid Kingdom finally fell to Rome, and the Seleucids were harried from Persia by the Parthians and forced by the Romans to relinquish control in Asia Minor. A rump Seleucid kingdom limped on in Syria until finally put to rest by Pompey in 64 BC. The Ptolemies lasted longer in Alexandria, though as a client under Rome. Egypt was finally annexed to Rome in 30 BC.



The Hellenistic period covers the period of Mediterranean history between the death of Alexander the Great in 323 BC and the emergence of the Roman Empire as signified by the Battle of Actium in 31 BC and the subsequent conquest of Ptolemaic Egypt the following year. The Ancient Greek word Hellas is the original word for Greece, from which the word "Hellenistic" was derived.

Rise of Rome
Widespread Roman interference in the Greek world was probably inevitable given the general manner of the ascendency of the Roman Republic. This Roman-Greek interaction began as a consequence of the Greek city-states located along the coast of southern Italy. Rome had come to dominate the Italian peninsula, and desired the submission of the Greek cities to its rule. Although they initially resisted, allying themselves with Pyrrhus of Epirus, and defeating the Romans at several battles, the Greek cities were unable to maintain this position and were absorbed by the Roman republic. Shortly afterwards, Rome became involved in Sicily, fighting against the Carthaginians in the First Punic War. The end result was the complete conquest of Sicily, including its previously powerful Greek cities, by the Romans.
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
World Powers Foretold by Daniel

Babylon
Daniel 2:32, 36-38; 7:4
607 B.C.E. King Nebuchadnezzar destroys Jerusalem

Medo-Persia
Daniel 2:32, 39; 7:5
539 B.C.E. Conquers Babylon
Isaiah the prophet also foretold how Babylon would be taken, and by whom - Isaiah 13:19; 14:22, 23; 44:27–45:2



Cyrus II of Persia commonly known as Cyrus the Great and also called Cyrus the Elder by the Greeks, was the founder of the Achaemenid Empire, the first Persian Empire.
Neo-Babylonian Empire
By the year 540 BC, Cyrus captured Elam (Susiana) and its capital, Susa. The Nabonidus Chronicle records that, prior to the battle(s), Nabonidus had ordered cult statues from outlying Babylonian cities to be brought into the capital, suggesting that the conflict had begun possibly in the winter of 540 BC.[62] Near the beginning of October 539 BC, Cyrus fought the Battle of Opis in or near the strategic riverside city of Opis on the Tigris, north of Babylon. The Babylonian army was routed, and on October 10, Sippar was seized without a battle, with little to no resistance from the populace. It is probable that Cyrus engaged in negotiations with the Babylonian generals to obtain a compromise on their part and therefore avoid an armed confrontation. Nabonidus was staying in the city at the time and soon fled to the capital, Babylon, which he had not visited in years.

Two days later, on October 12 (proleptic Gregorian calendar), Gubaru's
troops entered Babylon, again without any resistance from the Babylonian armies, and detained Nabonidus. Herodotus explains that to accomplish this feat, the Persians, using a basin dug earlier by the Babylonian queen Nitokris to protect Babylon against Median attacks, diverted the Euphrates river into a canal so that the water level dropped "to the height of the middle of a man's thigh", which allowed the invading forces to march directly through the river bed to enter at night. On October 29, Cyrus himself entered the city of Babylon and detained Nabonidus.

Prior to Cyrus's invasion of Babylon, the Neo-Babylonian Empire had conquered many kingdoms. In addition to Babylonia itself, Cyrus probably incorporated its subnational entities into his Empire, including Syria, Judea, and Arabia Petraea, although there is no direct evidence of this fact.

After taking Babylon, Cyrus the Great proclaimed himself "king of Babylon, king of Sumer and Akkad, king of the four corners of the world" in the famous Cyrus Cylinder, an inscription deposited in the foundations of the Esagila temple dedicated to the chief Babylonian god, Marduk. The text of the cylinder denounces Nabonidus as impious and portrays the victorious Cyrus pleasing the god Marduk. It describes how Cyrus had improved the lives of the citizens of Babylonia, repatriated displaced peoples and restored temples and cult sanctuaries. Although some have asserted that the cylinder represents a form of human rights charter, historians generally portray it in the context of a long-standing Mesopotamian tradition of new rulers beginning their reigns with declarations of reforms.


The Battle of Opis, fought in September 539 BC, was a major engagement between the armies of Persia under Cyrus the Great and the Neo-Babylonian Empire under Nabonidus during the Persian invasion of Mesopotamia. At the time, Babylonia was the last major power in western Asia that was not yet under Persian control. The battle was fought in or near the strategic riverside city of Opis, north of the capital Babylon. It resulted in a decisive victory for the Persians. A few days later, the city of Sippar surrendered to the Persians and Cyrus's forces entered Babylon apparently without a fight. Cyrus was subsequently proclaimed king of Babylonia and its subject territories, thus ending the independence of Babylon and incorporating the Babylonian Empire into the greater Persian Empire.


537 B.C.E. Cyrus decrees return of Jews to Jerusalem

Greece
Daniel 2:32, 39; 7:6
331 B.C.E. Alexander the Great conquers Persia

Rome
Daniel 2:33, 40; 7:7
63 B.C.E. Rules over Israel
70 C.E. Destroys Jerusalem

Anglo-American relations
Daniel 2:33, 41-43
1914-1918 C.E. During World War I, Anglo-American World Power comes into being

Daniel 8:23-25



Daniel was given a revelation through an angel, pinpointing the year of the Messiah’s arrival.
Daniel 9:24, 25

24 “There are 70 weeks that have been determined for your people and your holy city, in order to terminate the transgression, to finish off sin, to make atonement for error, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up the vision and the prophecy, and to anoint the Holy of Holies. 25 You should know and understand that from the issuing of the word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Leader, there will be 7 weeks, also 62 weeks. She will be restored and rebuilt, with a public square and moat, but in times of distress.

The prophecy was fulfilled precisely as detailed.

Porphyry - one of the most able pagan adversaries of Christianity of his day failed to prove one of the most end-times prophetic book wrong. In turn, he failed to prove miracles wrong. He failed to shake the pillar of faith.. He failed to prove the Christ an impostor.
The scriptures stand solid - supported by accurate prophecies.



Speaking of Porphyry...
Why trust the Bible?
Its truths protect us from destructive philosophical doctrines of lies - such as the Theory of Evolution.


Did you know...?


Porphyry (philosopher)
Starting-points Leading to the Intelligibles (Sententiae) is a summary of the concepts of Neoplatonism and follows the teachings of Plotinus closely. Porphyry's most influential contribution to philosophy, the Introduction to Categories, incorporated Aristotle's logic into Neoplatonism, in particular the doctrine of the categories interpreted in terms of entities (in later philosophy, "universals"). The Introduction describes how qualities attributed to things may be classified, breaking down the philosophical concept of substance into relationships of genus and species. Written by Porphyry as a preface to his commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories, it was translated into Latin by Boethius as Isagoge, and became a standard medieval textbook of philosophy that remained in use for centuries. It laid the foundation for later philosophical-theological discussions of logic and the problem of universals. In medieval textbooks, the Arbor porphyriana ("Porphyrian Tree") illustrated his logical classification of substance. To this day, taxonomists use a system derived from Porphyry's Tree to classify all living organisms.

Porphyry is also known as an opponent of Christianity and defender of Paganism, on the grounds that Christianity was irrational and placed excessive emphasis on the mystical.


Did You Know...?
Hypotheses are used to test hypotheses.


Dinosaurs did not go extinct - Birds are Dinosaurs. So be careful what you call a bird.
Excuse me while I go soak my head.
:facepalm:
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
Archaeology isn't my thing but I understand that there is some degree of concordance between the existence of historical figures and the bible from the Babylonian period onwards. Trying to extrapolate what we know then conclude its all literally true from the beginning to genesis doesn't work for most people with an interest in science and history. in fact it turns many people off Christianity. Regardless, I personally believe that Moses was a real person and that many if not all the of the laws recorded in the Torah were from Moses. However other than comparative religion I don't believe there is a shred of scientific evidence in support. I suspect that many of the stories of the Torah were passed down orally and first written down during the Babylonian exile period. That's my best guess.

I believe Jesus was the Jewish Messiah not because of any archaeological evidence or convincing proofs about prophecy, though I can argue prophecy along with all the other diehards and fundamentalists. Its simply what I grew up with. I've found through experience that believing in Jesus and applying His teachings to my life makes me a better person.
You always seem friendly, reasonable, and open-minded.

Would you please read Revelation 12:7-12? Especially verse 9, “....who is misleading the entire inhabited earth.” In your opinion, what do you think the import of that is?

What do you think he wants to accomplish, like, mislead how? And in what ways?
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
You always seem friendly, reasonable, and open-minded.

Would you please read Revelation 12:7-12? Especially verse 9, “....who is misleading the entire inhabited earth.” In your opinion, what do you think the import of that is?

What do you think he wants to accomplish, like, mislead how? And in what ways?

We will have different opinions about these verses. The JWs and Baha'is have a different exegesis.

What we may agree on is the Dragon mentioned is featured in both the book of Daniel and Revelations.

Who is the beast of Revelation?

For Baha'is, like the other beasts in Daniel it represents a particular empire that has come and been.
 

Hockeycowboy

Witness for Jehovah
Premium Member
We will have different opinions about these verses. The JWs and Baha'is have a different exegesis.

What we may agree on is the Dragon mentioned is featured in both the book of Daniel and Revelations.

Who is the beast of Revelation?

For Baha'is, like the other beasts in Daniel it represents a particular empire that has come and been.
I appreciate you stating your view. The Dragon in Revelation 12, though, is thrown out of heaven. Don’t you think that would rule out any Earthly empire? Also, It’s called “that Old Serpent / the Original Serpent”; For that to have any meaning, it must relate to another, well-known serpent in the Bible, don’t you think?

Plus, on top of all that, John (the writer of Revelation) refers to the Dragon specifically in verse 9 as “the one called Devil and Satan.”

Quite conclusive, wouldn’t you say?
 
Last edited:

Skwim

Veteran Member
World Powers Foretold by Daniel

Babylon
Daniel 2:32, 36-38; 7:4
607 B.C.E. King Nebuchadnezzar destroys Jerusalem

Medo-Persia
Daniel 2:32, 39; 7:5
539 B.C.E. Conquers Babylon
Isaiah the prophet also foretold how Babylon would be taken, and by whom - Isaiah 13:19; 14:22, 23; 44:27–45:2



Cyrus II of Persia commonly known as Cyrus the Great and also called Cyrus the Elder by the Greeks, was the founder of the Achaemenid Empire, the first Persian Empire.
Neo-Babylonian Empire


Two days later, on October 12 (proleptic Gregorian calendar), Gubaru's
troops entered Babylon, again without any resistance from the Babylonian armies, and detained Nabonidus. Herodotus explains that to accomplish this feat, the Persians, using a basin dug earlier by the Babylonian queen Nitokris to protect Babylon against Median attacks, diverted the Euphrates river into a canal so that the water level dropped "to the height of the middle of a man's thigh", which allowed the invading forces to march directly through the river bed to enter at night. On October 29, Cyrus himself entered the city of Babylon and detained Nabonidus.




The Battle of Opis, fought in September 539 BC, was a major engagement between the armies of Persia under Cyrus the Great and the Neo-Babylonian Empire under Nabonidus during the Persian invasion of Mesopotamia. At the time, Babylonia was the last major power in western Asia that was not yet under Persian control. The battle was fought in or near the strategic riverside city of Opis, north of the capital Babylon. It resulted in a decisive victory for the Persians. A few days later, the city of Sippar surrendered to the Persians and Cyrus's forces entered Babylon apparently without a fight. Cyrus was subsequently proclaimed king of Babylonia and its subject territories, thus ending the independence of Babylon and incorporating the Babylonian Empire into the greater Persian Empire.


537 B.C.E. Cyrus decrees return of Jews to Jerusalem

Greece
Daniel 2:32, 39; 7:6
331 B.C.E. Alexander the Great conquers Persia

Rome
Daniel 2:33, 40; 7:7
63 B.C.E. Rules over Israel
70 C.E. Destroys Jerusalem

Anglo-American relations
Daniel 2:33, 41-43
1914-1918 C.E. During World War I, Anglo-American World Power comes into being

Daniel 8:23-25



Daniel was given a revelation through an angel, pinpointing the year of the Messiah’s arrival.
Daniel 9:24, 25

24 “There are 70 weeks that have been determined for your people and your holy city, in order to terminate the transgression, to finish off sin, to make atonement for error, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up the vision and the prophecy, and to anoint the Holy of Holies. 25 You should know and understand that from the issuing of the word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Leader, there will be 7 weeks, also 62 weeks. She will be restored and rebuilt, with a public square and moat, but in times of distress.

The prophecy was fulfilled precisely as detailed.

Porphyry - one of the most able pagan adversaries of Christianity of his day failed to prove one of the most end-times prophetic book wrong. In turn, he failed to prove miracles wrong. He failed to shake the pillar of faith.. He failed to prove the Christ an impostor.
The scriptures stand solid - supported by accurate prophecies.



Speaking of Porphyry...
Why trust the Bible?
Its truths protect us from destructive philosophical doctrines of lies - such as the Theory of Evolution.


Did you know...?


Porphyry (philosopher)
Starting-points Leading to the Intelligibles (Sententiae) is a summary of the concepts of Neoplatonism and follows the teachings of Plotinus closely. Porphyry's most influential contribution to philosophy, the Introduction to Categories, incorporated Aristotle's logic into Neoplatonism, in particular the doctrine of the categories interpreted in terms of entities (in later philosophy, "universals"). The Introduction describes how qualities attributed to things may be classified, breaking down the philosophical concept of substance into relationships of genus and species. Written by Porphyry as a preface to his commentaries on Aristotle’s Categories, it was translated into Latin by Boethius as Isagoge, and became a standard medieval textbook of philosophy that remained in use for centuries. It laid the foundation for later philosophical-theological discussions of logic and the problem of universals. In medieval textbooks, the Arbor porphyriana ("Porphyrian Tree") illustrated his logical classification of substance. To this day, taxonomists use a system derived from Porphyry's Tree to classify all living organisms.

Porphyry is also known as an opponent of Christianity and defender of Paganism, on the grounds that Christianity was irrational and placed excessive emphasis on the mystical.


Did You Know...?
Hypotheses are used to test hypotheses.

Why are you yelling? It's very discourteous. Plus, it says your message isn't strong enough to stand on its own, which just may be the case. ;)

Excuse me while I go soak my head.
Certainly. Whatever helps.

.
 

sojourner

Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
We don’t trust the Bible on flimsy, misplaced interpretations of what were not intended to be Jeanne Dixonesque “predictions.” Prophecy isn’t some ecclesiastical Tarot deck. We trust the Bible for what it is: a collected and edited written theological treatment of Judaic and Christian experience, containing several different literary genres from several cultures and time periods. We trust that the Bible is that. We also trust that it is foundational to, informative of, and a product of, a number of theological threads, and that the writings are inspired.
 

Dawnofhope

Non-Proselytizing Baha'i
Staff member
Premium Member
I appreciate you stating your view. The Dragon in Revelation 12, though, is thrown out of heaven. Don’t you think that would rule out any Earthly empire? Also, It’s called “that Old Serpent / the Original Serpent”; For that to have any meaning, it must relate to another, well-known serpent in the Bible, don’t you think?

Plus, on top of all that, John (the writer of Revelation) refers to the Dragon specifically in verse 9 as “the one called Devil and Satan.”

Quite conclusive, wouldn’t you say?
Any interpretation needs to consider the text in its entirety as well as relationships to other biblical texts. Heaven symbolises that which pertains to the realm of God with particular concern for the Divine teachings, laws and attributes. Satan symbolises the lower nature of man. The dragon is clearly mentioned at the beginning of Revelation 12 as well as Daniel.

The apocalyptic scripture is highly symbolic and notoriously difficult to understand. Its best to look at more straightforward verses when initiating an interfaith discussion in my experience.
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
Why are you yelling? It's very discourteous. Plus, it says your message isn't strong enough to stand on its own, which just may be the case. ;)


Certainly. Whatever helps.

.
Beep! I see no all caps. Has yelling taken on a new characteristic that I am not aware of? :)
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Opinion..................................................................noted.
Much more than opinion. But you continue to fail here as on other threads.

Can you discuss your book of myths properly? That means no excessive green ink, no misrepresenting scripture (which of course includes reinterpreting after the fact), basically go with what the Bible says and see if it is accurate or not. It tends to fail again and again.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
We don’t trust the Bible on flimsy, misplaced interpretations of what were not intended to be Jeanne Dixonesque “predictions.” Prophecy isn’t some ecclesiastical Tarot deck. We trust the Bible for what it is: a collected and edited written theological treatment of Judaic and Christian experience, containing several different literary genres from several cultures and time periods. We trust that the Bible is that. We also trust that it is foundational to, informative of, and a product of, a number of theological threads, and that the writings are inspired.

Literalists have to debase prophesy to the point it is equal to me or you predicted that someone will see a red car. At that point even if the prophecies are "fulfilled" they in no way make Christianity any stronger since the weakest of religions have "prophecies" of that order that are fulfilled.
 

Kelly of the Phoenix

Well-Known Member
King Nebuchadnezzar effectively became world ruler in 607 B.C.E. when Jehovah God allowed him to destroy Jerusalem and its temple.
Middle Eastern empires can rarely compete with empires from other places. To say that Nebby ruled the world because he took over a couple of towns here and there is just plain insulting.

In the second year of his kingship, Nebuchadnezzar had a number of dreams, and he was so agitated that he could not sleep. 2 So the king gave the order to summon the magic-practicing priests, the conjurers, the sorcerers, and the Chaldeans to tell the king his dreams. . . .
Where are Nebby's government documents to show this? You'd think someone would've written it down, especially successors who didn't like the guy.

Its truths protect us from destructive philosophical doctrines of lies
That's really its main marketing strategy. It tells you it's the truth and encourages those who deny it to be murdered, because that's how truth works.

Quite conclusive, wouldn’t you say?
Only if you care what John thinks.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Much of the Bible is political...........

Since I find that Jesus put much faith in God's political kingdom of Daniel 2:44 even to the point that God's kingdom government was the theme of Jesus' teaching as per Luke 4:43.
Since you find much of the Bible is political, then I think you might agree that the proclaiming about the 'good news of God's kingdom' as Jesus instructed his followers to do on a grand international scale as it is being done today according to Matthew 24:14; Acts 1:8, then Jesus is a true Christian's ' Commander in Chief ' ( Hail to the Chief ! )
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Shrugs. Talking with god directly sounds more powerful. Scriptures can be burnt or go obstelete. Communication with god cannot.

I find that Scripture will never go obsolete because God is backing His Word.
Apparently God also believes talking (praying) to God directly was the more powerful.
In other words, God did Not delegate communication with Him to any angel, heavenly creation.
Communication is to be directed directly to God according to the Model Our Father prayer.
Our Father which art in heaven......
 

Unveiled Artist

Veteran Member
I find that Scripture will never go obsolete because God is backing His Word.
Apparently God also believes talking (praying) to God directly was the more powerful.
In other words, God did Not delegate communication with Him to any angel, heavenly creation.
Communication is to be directed directly to God according to the Model Our Father prayer.
Our Father which art in heaven......

The Word means jesus christ not written scripture. (god spoke through his Word not through words). I can see why youd say jesus would live forever. Thats so engraved in our history that it would probably be 4224 before christianity goes completely dead by aging relics and papers that disolve with time. Since nothing last forever.

We are at age, we understand death more. Yet, we only apply it to physical things as if the spiritual doesnt evolve with the flesh.

Probably fear of disassociating oneself from ones belief. It leaves a pang of "fear" and we crawl back where we are comfortable.
 

nPeace

Veteran Member
Why Trust the Bible
Part 4 - The Bible is Reliable

The New Testament is a collection of Christian works written in the common (Koine) Greek language of the first century, at different times by various writers, and the modern consensus is that it provides important evidence regarding Judaism in the first century AD. In almost all Christian traditions today, the New Testament consists of 27 books. The original texts were written in the first and perhaps the second centuries of the Christian Era, in Greek, which was the common language of the Eastern Mediterranean from the conquests of Alexander the Great (335–323 BC) until the Muslim conquests in the 7th century AD. All the works that eventually became incorporated into the New Testament are believed to have been written no later than around 120 AD,. John A. T. Robinson, Dan Wallace, and William F. Albright dated all the books of the New Testament before 70 AD. Others give a final date of 80 AD, or at 96 AD.

This ordering is remarkably consistent in the manuscript tradition, with very few deviations.



Septuagint
The Septuagint or LXX (from the Latin: septuāgintā literally "seventy"; sometimes called the Greek Old Testament) is the earliest extant Greek translation of the Old Testament from the original Hebrew. It is estimated that the first five books of the Old Testament, known as the Torah or Pentateuch, were translated in the mid-3rd century BCE and the remaining texts were translated in the 2nd century BCE. Under Christian auspices, the Septuagint includes the Hebrew Bible as well as the deuterocanonical books of the Christian Old Testament. Considered the primary Greek translation of the Old Testament, it is quoted a number of times in the New Testament, particularly in Pauline epistles, by the Apostolic Fathers, and later by the Greek Church Fathers.

Final form
All the books of western biblical canons of the Old Testament are found in the Septuagint, although the order does not always coincide with the Western ordering of the books. The Septuagint order for the Old Testament is evident in the earliest Christian Bibles (4th century).

Some scriptures of ancient origin are found in the Septuagint but are not present in the Hebrew Bible. These additional books are Tobit, Judith, Wisdom of Solomon, Wisdom of Jesus son of Sirach, Baruch, Letter of Jeremiah (which later became chapter 6 of Baruch in the Vulgate), additions to Daniel (The Prayer of Azarias, the Song of the Three Children, Susanna and Bel and the Dragon), additions to Esther, 1 Maccabees, 2 Maccabees, 3 Maccabees, 4 Maccabees, 1 Esdras, Odes, including the Prayer of Manasseh, the Psalms of Solomon, and Psalm 151.

Despite this, there are fragments of some deuterocanonical books that have been found in Hebrew among the Dead Sea Scrolls found at Qumran:

What is the Septuagint?




The Critics Failure
Critics make the false assertion, "But prophecy is only the Jewish/Christian interpretation of matters, not an inspired revelation."

Matthew 24:15, 16
15“Therefore, when you catch sight of the disgusting thing that causes desolation, as spoken about by Daniel the prophet, standing in a holy place (let the reader use discernment), 16then let those in Judea begin fleeing to the mountains.
Luke 19:43, 44; 21:20-22

Daniel 11:31
And arms will stand up, proceeding from him; and they will profane the sanctuary, the fortress, and remove the constant feature. “And they will put in place the disgusting thing that causes desolation.

Daniel 12:11

“And from the time that the constant feature has been removed and the disgusting thing that causes desolation has been put in place, there will be 1,290 days.

Rantings of a crazy man? :smirk:

Roman rule over Judea created deep religious and political tensions. Josephus, the main source of information on that turbulent period, described various Jewish liberation groups that sprang up. One group was the Zealots. As their name suggests, the Zealots were zealous for Jewish freedom and, spurred on by messianic fervor, were willing to use violence. They even despised fellow Jews who sought peace with the Roman authorities. The uprisings in which the Zealots shared did not lead to liberation; rather, their actions sowed the seeds for national disaster - the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and its temple in 70 C.E. Some Zealots fled to the mountain fortress of Masada, which had been occupied by those who were called Sicarii (Dagger Men). In 73 C.E., after a two-year siege, the Zealots committed mass suicide rather than surrender.

In 66 C.E. pagan Roman armies surrounded “the holy city” Jerusalem, now the center of Jewish revolt against Rome. Thus, the ‘causing of desolation’ by the disgusting thing was imminent, and so this was the final signal for discerning Christians to ‘flee to the mountains.’ Following their flight, the desolation of the city and nation occurred, Jerusalem being destroyed in the year 70 C.E. Some Zealots fled to the mountain fortress of Masada, which had been occupied by those who were called Sicarii (Dagger Men).
After a two-year siege, the Zealots committed mass suicide rather than surrender.
Thus the last Jewish stronghold, Masada, falling to the Romans in 73 C.E.

Josephus says that during the whole campaign against Jerusalem 1,100,000 Jews died, many from pestilence and famine, and 97,000 were taken captive, he says, many being scattered as slaves to all quarters of the empire.—The Jewish War, VI, 420 (ix, 3).


Just as was spoken through the prophet Daniel.

Daniel 9
24 “There are 70 weeks that have been determined for your people and your holy city, in order to terminate the transgression, to finish off sin, to make atonement for error, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal up the vision and the prophecy, and to anoint the Holy of Holies. 25 You should know and understand that from the issuing of the word to restore and to rebuild Jerusalem until Messiah the Leader, there will be 7 weeks, also 62 weeks. She will be restored and rebuilt, with a public square and moat, but in times of distress.
26 “And after the 62 weeks, Messiah will be cut off, with nothing for himself.
“And the people of a leader who is coming will destroy the city and the holy place. And its end will be by the flood. And until the end there will be war; what is decided upon is desolations.

27 “And he will keep the covenant in force for the many for one week; and at the half of the week, he will cause sacrifice and gift offering to cease.
“And
on the wing of disgusting things there will be the one causing desolation; and until an extermination, what was decided on will be poured out also on the one lying desolate.”

[GALLERY=media, 8615]Timeline by nPeace posted Aug 7, 2018 at 3:23 PM[/GALLERY]

Did Jesus really predict the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem?

Was Jesus really the Messiah foretold in prophecy?

Why are the Dead Sea Scrolls important?

The Dead Sea Scrolls are not much different to the Septuagint.
Dead Sea Scrolls (also Qumran Caves Scrolls) are ancient Jewish religious, mostly Hebrew, manuscripts found in the Qumran Caves in the West Bank near the Dead Sea.

The Truth Behind The Dead Sea Scrolls
Question - 25:15
I think the bast answer is at 27:30; 40:50 - 41:50
44:00 Definite evidence that the Bible is true.

I believe the strongest evidence is found within the Biblical text. It is only being verified by discoveries made.
Wait! These words sound familiar... :tonguewink:
 
Last edited:

nPeace

Veteran Member
Middle Eastern empires can rarely compete with empires from other places. To say that Nebby ruled the world because he took over a couple of towns here and there is just plain insulting.


Where are Nebby's government documents to show this? You'd think someone would've written it down, especially successors who didn't like the guy.


That's really its main marketing strategy. It tells you it's the truth and encourages those who deny it to be murdered, because that's how truth works.


Only if you care what John thinks.
I'm not responsible if persons dismiss accurate history. :shrug:
 
Top