• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Gowdy: If they had something on Trump, Schiff would have already leaked it.

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I couldn't agree more, honestly.

How do you feel ? :D

"So Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) makes a very good point when he says that if there were any evidence that Trump had committed a crime, "Adam Schiff would have leaked it."

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday.” "
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3339...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=crowder
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I couldn't agree more, honestly.

How do you feel ? :D

"So Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) makes a very good point when he says that if there were any evidence that Trump had committed a crime, "Adam Schiff would have leaked it."

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday.” "
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3339...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=crowder

I think that if he had something concrete he would have made a move by now, but......who knows? Maybe he's waiting for a lead he thinks will be useful against the President to play out. IDK
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
This whole thing is just a hurry up and wait, meanwhile the media is making a mint twice a day by provoking the other side. My only regret is I didn't get in on the ground floor. :D
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
The game of Politics is so dependent on delivery, quantity, and timing, that I disagree. If there's bombshell info, it will come out closer to time to November. Small leaks over long periods of time do more to rouse opposition voters, keeping them stoked, than one haymaker blow months ahead of time.

Then, usually much later, more accurate information will come out as real professionals have had time to digest it and dissect it. This is how we've always done things.

♫Don't tell me about the answer, cause then another one will come along soon...♫
 

jonathan180iq

Well-Known Member
This whole thing is just a hurry up and wait, meanwhile the media is making a mint twice a day by provoking the other side. My only regret is I didn't get in on the ground floor. :D

Hahaha!
If only we could invest in media trading like we do the stock market...
 

bobhikes

Nondetermined
Premium Member
I couldn't agree more, honestly.

How do you feel ? :D

"So Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) makes a very good point when he says that if there were any evidence that Trump had committed a crime, "Adam Schiff would have leaked it."

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday.” "
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3339...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=crowder

I really don't understand it to be honest.

Trump has no problems throwing people under the bus on twitter and on TV. Republicans, Democrats, Veterans, FBI, CIA, His own Staff, Friendly Nations, Less than Friendly nations, Gold Star Family's, Women, Children, TV personalities, The News Reporters, The only person he will not insult or even criticize is Vladimir Putin, I really am at a lost of why.

I am at the point of believing he is selling out America for his personal wealth.[/QUOTE]
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
I couldn't agree more, honestly.

How do you feel ? :D

"So Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) makes a very good point when he says that if there were any evidence that Trump had committed a crime, "Adam Schiff would have leaked it."

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday.” "
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3339...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=crowder

Also Peter Strzok, said there was nothing there two days after the FISA warrant. No reason to think he was biased in favor of Trump.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
This whole thing is just a hurry up and wait, meanwhile the media is making a mint twice a day by provoking the other side. My only regret is I didn't get in on the ground floor. :D


I have far more regrets than that.

Couldda been a labour racketeer. Coullda gone
into like, atomic spy But. no. Just another
girl on the sidewalk.
 

Nakosis

Non-Binary Physicalist
Premium Member
I try not to pay too much interest to this topic, but, regardless of Trump, haven't some people already pled guilty?

It's often cheaper to plead guilty and accept a plea deal than fight it in court and prove you're innocent.

You may prove you're innocent but become financially ruined. Like Rick Gates got most of the charges against him dismissed and saved his family a lot of money by pleading guilty.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I couldn't agree more, honestly.

How do you feel ? :D

"So Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) makes a very good point when he says that if there were any evidence that Trump had committed a crime, "Adam Schiff would have leaked it."

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday.” "
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3339...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=crowder
Gowdy says a lot, and that is not a compliment.

Schiff does not have some sort of back-channel to Mueller as both of them would know that this alone would tend to make the investigation bogus. Secondly, even if Schiff knows some classified information, as we know he does because of the hearings that have been held, he'd be in trouble in an instant if he passed those on to the media and/or the public.

Gowdy is trying to have it both ways: sometimes criticizing Trump and other times defending the indefensible actions of Trump.

Finally, why would anyone believe much of anything that's on Fox?
 

Mindmaster

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Also Peter Strzok, said there was nothing there two days after the FISA warrant. No reason to think he was biased in favor of Trump.

You know the only thing I learned about his guy from his testimony was that he was a super-dick. :D I'm quite disappointed in his comments in that I thought they'd do more to clear the air. Instead, it looked like all he could do is confirm they were all working as some sort of sneaky deep state cabal. :D
 

tytlyf

Not Religious
I couldn't agree more, honestly.

How do you feel ? :D

"So Rep. Trey Gowdy (R-SC) makes a very good point when he says that if there were any evidence that Trump had committed a crime, "Adam Schiff would have leaked it."

“I have not seen one scintilla of evidence that this president colluded, conspired, confederated with Russia, and neither has anyone else, or you may rest assured Adam Schiff would have leaked it,” Gowdy said on “Fox News Sunday.” "
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3339...&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=crowder
Howdy Gowdy makes a silly point. Assuming Adam Schiff has access to some secret intelligence that he does not. This is a political statement to make the rubes think "see, even Schiff hasn't said anything meaning there isn't any evidence."

Of course there's evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia. Even the NRA. The FBI investigation wasn't started over Trump. It was started on his campaign. I'll tell you one thing, Trump sure does act guilty.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
Howdy Gowdy makes a silly point. Assuming Adam Schiff has access to some secret intelligence that he does not. This is a political statement to make the rubes think "see, even Schiff hasn't said anything meaning there isn't any evidence."

Of course there's evidence of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia. Even the NRA. The FBI investigation wasn't started over Trump. It was started on his campaign. I'll tell you one thing, Trump sure does act guilty.


Know a lot of guilty actors, do you?
 
Top