• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Are there verses in the bible that have been proven to be scientifically true after the writing?

Sir Doom

Cooler than most of you
Disputing what the Bible says is a fairly new development in human history. To my knowledge there are no 'gotcha' verses.
 

74x12

Well-Known Member
Give me verses that tell of things once thought wrong or just a fable that have now been shown to be truth.
Plenty of examples from archeology. A good one is the existence of king Nebuchadnezzar which was disputed and doubted by skeptics until proven true by archeology.
 

David T

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Give me verses that tell of things once thought wrong or just a fable that have now been shown to be truth.
Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The riverwas cut by the world's great flood andruns over rocks from the basement of time. On some of those rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
The Bible mentions the Hittites. There was a time when there was no archeological evidence of the Hittites. Archeologists then were critical of the Bible for saying the Hittites existed. Later archeologists found evidence that confirmed the existence of the Hittites as described by the Bible.
 

A Son of God

Daniel 12:4
Bible verses have been reinterpreted after the fact. But there are so many errors in the Bible that one really cannot claim there is any "science" in the book.
Your first mistake is to even think of it as a possible "science book". It is ideology. Not science. But as any book, the facts within it can be proven either true or false by current evidence.
 

A Son of God

Daniel 12:4
Disputing what the Bible says is a fairly new development in human history. To my knowledge there are no 'gotcha' verses.
Once again you are totally incorrect, sir. It just had dire consequences in some societies. But many people historically disputed the bible including Darwin as a primary example.
 

A Son of God

Daniel 12:4
Plenty of examples from archeology. A good one is the existence of king Nebuchadnezzar which was disputed and doubted by skeptics until proven true by archeology.
A very good example sir. You are correct. that is one of many if you search you will find more.
 

A Son of God

Daniel 12:4
Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The riverwas cut by the world's great flood andruns over rocks from the basement of time. On some of those rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.
What?
 

A Son of God

Daniel 12:4
The Bible mentions the Hittites. There was a time when there was no archeological evidence of the Hittites. Archeologists then were critical of the Bible for saying the Hittites existed. Later archeologists found evidence that confirmed the existence of the Hittites as described by the Bible.
That is correct. From 1300 AD until archaeologists uncovered evidence, people doubted the scriptures. They believed the Hittites were just a story like Jonah and the Whale.
 

A Son of God

Daniel 12:4
Who disputed his existence?

.
Most disputed his existence before the evidence was uncovered. Most of the world are not Christian and have claimed for 2000 years that the words in this collection of books are false totally. With evidence of the truth within the words people should have understood that they cannot disprove it because it is fact. Over and over it has been proven to be such. By scientific laws this makes it "hard" evidence. However, most scientists will never admit that.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Most disputed his existence before the evidence was uncovered. Most of the world are not Christian and have claimed for 2000 years that the words in this collection of books are false totally. With evidence of the truth within the words people should have understood that they cannot disprove it because it is fact. Over and over it has been proven to be such. By scientific laws this makes it "hard" evidence. However, most scientists will never admit that.
I have never seen that. Are you sure that you are not projecting your flaws upon others?
 
Top