• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Is it "an assertion that Atheism is correct"?

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
"One does not 'believe in Atheism' ".
It is not worth believing in Atheism as is not worth believing in "Leprechaun-ism". Is it correct to state that, please?
"Worth" has nothing to do with it. Atheism asserts nothing that could be believed in. What beliefs, exactly, would 'belief in atheism' entail?

Why is this such a difficult concept?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
"One does not 'believe in Atheism' ".
It is not worth believing in Atheism as is not worth believing in "Leprechauns-ism". Is it correct to state that, please?

Regards
You don't seem to understand. You are the one with a belief that is equal to believing in "leprechaunism" We are the ones with a lack of belief in that. Do you have even the least ability to reason?
 

paarsurrey

Veteran Member
You don't seem to understand. You are the one with a belief that is equal to believing in "leprechaunism" We are the ones with a lack of belief in that. Do you have even the least ability to reason?
and that is one's opinion not a reality, please. Is it, please?
Regards
 

Valjean

Veteran Member
Premium Member
and that is one's opinion not a reality, please. Is it, please?
Regards
No. That's mathematics. That's epistemology. That's logic. It's not opinion.

Emptiness, a lack of belief, a blank canvas, is what you start off with. It's what exists prior to something added, asserted, or painted.
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
paarsurrey said:
Is it "an assertion that Atheism is correct"?

So it needs no evidence for rejection as per the notion of Christopher Hitchens . Right, please?
Regards
You have no evidence but believe in a god; Atheism is not based on evidence BUT on a lack of evidence!
 

rstrats

Active Member
Altfish,
re: "Atheism is not based on evidence BUT on a lack of evidence!"

But couldn't a lack of evidence be considered evidence for a position?
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Sorry, I don't agree with one here.
I believe in "G-d exists" very naturally, as I believe in my father and mother. G-d is Evident, and Evident does not need any evidence. If He had needed any evidence, then He would have not had the attribute of being Evident.

Atheism as the word depicts is pegged with Belief in G-d which presupposes that humans believed in the existence of G-d very naturally.
Right, please?

Regards

Your belief is your belief. Your belief is not evidence. Without evidence of coffee how could anyone say macchiato exists? Without evidence of elephants how could anyone be sure elephants exist? Without evidence of pink unicorns how could anyone imagine pink unicorns exist? And without evidence of god how can anyone say god exists?... All they can confirm if they do not have evidence is that they believe.

Belief : acceptance that something exists or is true without proof.

Evidence : the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.


Please show me one newborn with a belief in god. Please show me any child who has a belief in god unless they have previously been indoctrinated into that belief. Please show me one child indoctrinated into one of the abrahamic faiths who believes in Thor or Aries are the one gods.

Atheism as a word and a mind state means one, and only one thing : disbelief or lack of belief in the existence of God or gods.

I have provided this definition for you on several occasions and still you try to impose your will on the recognised definition. Why your fixation with trying to discredit atheism? Is is obvious you do not understand atheism.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Define "disbelieve."
Given the lack of evidence, weak atheism -- lack of belief -- is the default position.

I think a positive conclusion like "there is no God," based on no evidence; on nothing, is questionable.

I did not write the definitionof atheism

Complete (100%) lack of evidence over the 10000+ years of known god worship. Also the contradictory evidence such as My Go is a caring god... Childhood leukemia
My God is a designer god... the mosquito
My God is a listening god... He futility of prayer

Feel free to interpret that as you will, i certainly see no question as, i believe, many atheists would not see a question.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
Absence of evidence is Not evidence of absence.

Its a pretty good indicator given that in 10000+ years of god worship literally billions of attempts at providing evidence for god have failed. Making gods the most failed concept in human history.

But you feel different so pray that he does something about childhood leukemia or stops religion based wars, or feeds the starving children of the world... etc. After all, these things shouldn't be so hard for a bod who made a whole universe from nothing in a week. Shall we take bets on whether he'll take action or not?
 

Altfish

Veteran Member
I did not write the definitionof atheism

Complete (100%) lack of evidence over the 10000+ years of known god worship. Also the contradictory evidence such as My Go is a caring god... Childhood leukemia
My God is a designer god... the mosquito
My God is a listening god... He futility of prayer

Feel free to interpret that as you will, i certainly see no question as, i believe, many atheists would not see a question.
As Stephen Fry said when asked on Irish TV what he would say to God if after he died he met him.
His response (and I paraphrase) was, "Bone cancer in children, what's that about?"
 

Thaif

Member
Sorry, that is not a dogmatic view. There is no dogma in atheism. Show valid evidence and an atheist will change his mind.

is your lack of belief in leprechauns due to dogma?
Oh, I don't know, an atheist dogma might be "I'll believe it to be true if you can prove it to be true.", you might call it the dogma of proof. A dogma is more of a principle that a belief, it doesn't necessarily encompass a belief in a thing and the dogma for any particular atheist might be different for different atheists because it can be a personal dogma and I think different atheists have different view on atheism. But then again, what do I know, I'm not an atheist.
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
As Stephen Fry said when asked on Irish TV what he would say to God if after he died he met him.
His response (and I paraphrase) was, "Bone cancer in children, what's that about?"

An aside on bone cancer

Interestingly, Stephen Fry has recently had the same op for prostate cancer at about the same time as my husband. Both clear now but they both need a 6 monthly checkup for life because bone cancer is a very common progression from prostate cancer.
 
Top