Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're mixing different concepts... Yet to explain:Can you give me the name of ?????????
New name of Christ is a secret; yet is right in front of us cryptically.
John is made up to make people believe Yeshua's name has something to do with YHVH, which meant Lord To Be, and shouldn't be implied as Babylonian Judaism assumed.
Now this is an amazing verse, as this is related in Isaiah 35:10, and Isaiah 51:11, that they will have Ever Lasting Joy on their foreheads...
This is referring to Wisdom being as a seductive woman, where the name isn't really related...Song of Solomon 1:3?
This can be read as simply saying the Lord's name, and YHVH is not a specific name, just a description.
That isn't declaring a specific name, just that people do things using the Lord.
Simply saying fear the Lord, doesn't need to be a specific name.Psalms 86:11?
This answers what the name is, and it is literally right in front of us... Yet if someone doesn't get the basics, they'll not get the complexities of the New Song.Can you give me the name of ?????????
In my opinion.with the Judaic belief, that Jesus teaches.
But you've never really explained why Christianity, from the Bible, does not match Jesus's religion.In my opinion.
- Yeshua fitted with Hebraic/Israelite beliefs.
- Judaism doesn't fit with the Tanakh; it fits with the Babylonian Talmud.
- Christianity from John, Paul and Simon fits with Pharisaic Judaism; not with Yeshua's teachings.
Sorry didn't post the links, edited and added them...But you've never really explained why Christianity, from the Bible, does not match Jesus's religion.
Ok that is an involved subject, however, I believe the sacrifice, to be completely conditionalSorry didn't post the links, edited and added them...
Simple version is Yeshua challenged the Sanhedrin for murdering the prophets as atoning sacrifices in Matthew 23:27-38, Mark 7:1-13, and the Parable of the Wicked Husbandman (Matthew 21:33-46, Mark 12:1-12, and Luke 20:9-19)...
Therefore the idea they all taught Yeshua came to die for people's sins is diametrically opposed to his teachings.
If you look at the links, there is masses of info that can be shown to be contradictory; yet when we get the very basic premise they put forward is flawed, the rest falls over like a house of cards.
In my opinion.
You're mixing different concepts... Yet to explain:
New name of Christ is a secret; yet is right in front of us cryptically.
John is made up to make people believe Yeshua's name has something to do with YHVH, which meant Lord To Be, and shouldn't be implied as Babylonian Judaism assumed.
Now this is an amazing verse, as this is related in Isaiah 35:10, and Isaiah 51:11, that they will have Ever Lasting Joy on their foreheads...
This is also a Dharmic concept called Sat Chit Ananda, to be in constant bliss.
We should also take into account Zechariah 14:9 that the Lord will be king over the whole world, and his name will be One name accepted globally.
This is referring to Wisdom being as a seductive woman, where the name isn't really related...
Tho it is interesting in Song of Solomon 8:6 that it uses Flame of the Lord, which is a Zoroastrian specific term; where the Lord is called Lord of Wisdom (Ahura Mazda).
This can be read as simply saying the Lord's name, and YHVH is not a specific name, just a description.
That isn't declaring a specific name, just that people do things using the Lord.
Simply saying fear the Lord, doesn't need to be a specific name.
This answers what the name is, and it is literally right in front of us... Yet if someone doesn't get the basics, they'll not get the complexities of the New Song.
In my opinion.
Ok that is an involved subject, however, I believe the sacrifice, to be completely conditional
John 3:36
This literally means that without that understanding, the person is going to Hell.
It isn't a worldly religion, trying to make it worldly isn't going to work.
It is not a salvation through works, religion.
There is only one Messiah (anointed king) in the Messianic age, and Yeshua has the guest-list from his actions.so how can christ appear if none are exclusively christ?
These are in reference to imposters of Yeshua using the term Ego I-mee ("I Am"); which we repeatedly find badly worded in the fake Gospel of John.Matthew 24:5
For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
Mark 13:6
For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.
Luke 21:8
And he said, Take heed that ye be not deceived: for many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and the time draweth near: go you not therefore after them.
There is only one Messiah (anointed king) in the Messianic age, and Yeshua has the guest-list from his actions.
These are in reference to imposters of Yeshua using the term Ego I-mee ("I Am"); which we repeatedly find badly worded in the fake Gospel of John.
In my opinion.
Christos = Anointed = Messiahchrist is all as the name implies.
i'm talking about the name at exodus 3:14. the name that moses learned from the egyptian priesthood and known in other belief systems.Christos = Anointed = Messiah
In my opinion.
That would mean that they could come in His name.i disagree. anyone claiming to be the exclusive christ is the problem. christ is all as the name implies.
This is a concept, ehyah is 'To Be'; meaning the Lord will become what it says.i'm talking about the name at exodus 3:14.
Told them to love him more than family, and give up everything to follow him.jesus didn't call for people to idolize him.
This is a concept, ehyah is 'To Be'; meaning the Lord will become what it says.
Told them to love him more than family, and give up everything to follow him.
In my opinion.
jesus isn't the All. no person is.That would mean that they could come in His name.
The reason they cant come in His name, is because they arent Jesus.
Jesus isnt a average person..You really arent going to understand the Scripture, with that idea
This is the whole point in the Biblical texts: Proverbs 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing, but the glory of kings is to search out a matter.god doesn't play favorites. surely you wouldn't suggest that god would stack the deck, load the dice, rig the game????
In Psalms 82:6 it says we're Elohim, which should be translated as Angels... There is no such thing as demigods, that is what ancient polytheistic religions believed in.at best he is a demi-god like the rest of us.
Melchizedek came from Salam, which is peace; the same as Kalki, Maitreya, Buddha come from Shambhala (Place of Peace)...jesus was ordered/patterned after melchizedek
true, not everyone is going to step up, or try to complete the challenge.This is the whole point in the Biblical texts: Proverbs 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing, but the glory of kings is to search out a matter.
Only those wise enough will ever understand it, and be worthy of an Age of Enlightenment.
a demi-god is still a god. it just has the adjective and attribute demi attached to it. demi literally means half size and is not reference to a human being necessarily. it means the offspring of a deity vs jesus was also a man; or offspring of mankind, son of man.In Psalms 82:6 it says we're Elohim, which should be translated as Angels... There is no such thing as demigods, that is what ancient polytheistic religions believed in.