• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Musings on Hebrew Views About Yeshua

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
All this argument over who is Yeshua, when the Tanakh told us; yet some people who claim to speak Hebrew, can't read properly in an ancient symbolic language.

H3444 (Yeshua) + H1961 (To become) = Exodus 15:2-3, Psalms 118:14-21, Isaiah 12:2 (2 Samuel 10:11 David Vs Ammon) +5 Verses Isaiah

H3444 (Yeshua) + H7200 (To see) = Exodus 14:13, Psalms 98:3, Isaiah 52:10 (2 Chronicles 20:17 Jehoshaphat Vs Ammon)

So the Children of Israel saw the salvation of our God rescue us from the Egyptians (Exodus 14:13), and that the Lord would become our salvation physically (Exodus 15:2-3).

We saw the Lord appear in battle, and become our salvation (2 Samuel 10:11 + 2 Chronicles 20:17).

Then David prophesied that the Lord would become the Chief Corner Stone that the Builders reject (Psalms 118:14-21)...

With Isaiah continuing this thread in multiple places that the Lord would become our salvation (Isaiah 12:2), and specifically Isaiah 28:16 if understood properly.

Isaiah 52:10 starts that the Lord will be physically seen as his servant in the form of a son of man (Isaiah 52:14); this is the Lord's Right Arm which the nations will physically see, as related in Psalms 98.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 
Last edited:

Tumah

Veteran Member
I fixed your post for you.
All this argument over who is Yeshua when the Tanakh told us;
In my opinion. :innocent:
That's right.
yet some people who claim to speak Hebrew, can't read properly in an ancient symbolic language.
In my opinion. :innocent:
That's right.
That's right.
H3444 (Yeshua) + H1961 (To become) = Exodus 15:2-3, Psalms 118:14-21, Isaiah 12:2 (2 Samuel 10:11 David Vs Ammon) +5 Verses Isaiah
Say what now?

H3444 (Yeshua) + H7200 (To physically see) = Exodus 14:13, Psalms 98:3, Isaiah 52:10 (2 Chronicles 20:17 Jehoshaphat Vs Ammon)
Huh?

Also:
physically
In my opinion. :innocent:
That's right.
So the Children of Israel saw the salvation of our God rescue us from the Egyptians (Exodus 14:13), and that the Lord would become our salvation physically (Exodus 15:2-3).
They were physically saved from Egypt. What are you getting at?

We saw the Lord appear twice in battle, and become our salvation (2 Samuel 10:11 + 2 Chronicles 20:17).
Who's "we" white man?

Then David prophesied that the Lord would become the Chief Corner Stone that the Builders reject (Psalms 118:14-21)...
In my opinion. :innocent:
That's right.
With Isaiah continuing this thread in multiple places that the Lord would become our salvation (Isaiah 12:2), and specifically Isaiah 28:16 if understood properly.
Who's "our" white man?

Isaiah 52:10 starts that the Lord will be physically seen as his servant in the form of a son of man (Isaiah 52:14); this is the Lord's Right Arm which the nations will physically see, as related in Psalms 98.
In my opinion. :innocent:
That's right.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Spot on! Spot on, I say! The OP is right...right as...wait...as...right as rain! Yeah, that's it! "Right as rain!" Um...something...I forgot...something was right as rain...what was that?...I had it a minute ago, darn it!...Oh yeah!...The OP is right as rain! Now, I got it! WHOOT! I'm on a roll! The OP is right as rain and Hebrews...nasty, mean Hebrews are right as rain! Oh, D'uh! That wasn't it. It was "stupid" Hebrews! Right. Right. Right! "Stupid Hebrews are right as rain!" Got it! In my opinion.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Say what now?
Strongs or a Biblical concordance, gives us quick access to all the same intertexual usages of keywords in the Hebrew.
When we do specific keyword searches, these are the results; implying Moses, David, Isaiah knew far more than we do, and purposely put certain words in to relay a symbolic meaning.
Who's "we" white man?
Who's "our" white man?
Currently according to the Bible, Rabbinic Judaism isn't even our people; so quit acting clever, when you don't even get the basics.

You already knew my Jewish family line came from Lviv, next to the Pale Settlement.
They were physically saved from Egypt. What are you getting at?
We escaped the Egyptians by the red sea, this in Exodus 14:3 is quoted as us seeing (H7200) the salvation (H3444) from our God.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

Tumah

Veteran Member
Strongs or a Biblical concordance, gives us quick access to all the same intertexual usages of keywords in the Hebrew.
The thing is - and bear with me here, because this is important - Hebrew isn't made up of keywords, but actual ... words. And grammar too.

When we do specific keyword searches, these are the results; implying Moses, David, Isaiah knew far more than we do, and purposely put certain words in to relay a symbolic meaning.[/quote]
No, this doesn't imply anything of the sort. It's not called implication where you're using eisegesis. You can tell when it's eisegesis if you need to first accept certain givens not found anywhere in the text as being true before you begin your interpretation.

Currently according to the Bible, Rabbinic Judaism isn't even our people; so quit acting clever, when you don't even get the basics.

Currently according to everybody, you don't have the authority to determine what the Bible does and does not say. Also. Rabbinic Judaism isn't a people, it's a religion. Jewish people are people.

You already knew my Jewish family line came from Lviv, next to the Pale Settlement.
I did not. And you give yourself way too much importance if you happened to have told me once and expected me to remember. You also haven't disclosed where that's your mother's or father's line.

We escaped the Egyptians by the red sea, this in Exodus 14:3 is quoted as us seeing (H7200) the salvation (H3444) from our God.

In my opinion. :innocent:
Do you think that we did that with our eyes closed?
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
You can tell when it's eisegesis if you need to first accept certain givens not found anywhere in the text
This is only one simple aspect of this massive tapestry; people who assume too much, before actually studying all the intertexuality, is part of the reason many are confused, as people don't study properly.

I'd never have accepted any of these things, and it is based purely on exegesis, as this is what the text stated.
Hebrew isn't made up of keywords, but actual ... words. And grammar too.
Which is why we have to understand each in ancient Hebraic grammatical contexts, and not in English or using a Latin grammatical system.
Currently according to everybody, you don't have the authority to determine what the Bible does and does not say.
The Bible speaks for its self; making this about me isn't the topic.
Rabbinic Judaism isn't a people, it's a religion. Jewish people are people.
People who are worthy to be deemed Judah, are those who've accepted the Bible's prophetic statements, those who deny this, are no longer our people...

To explain it simply, we can't claim to be a group of people who praise the Lord (Judah), and then deny the Lord in the same breath.
You also haven't disclosed where that's your mother's or father's line.
It is from my grandfathers side, and i don't agree with Rabbinic thinking, that genealogy only comes through the mother.... Yet this is about a Biblical topic; not me.
Do you think that we did that with our eyes closed?
No of course not, our eyes haven't been closed until the last two thousand years; which is where this is seeing, can we open them before we all accidentally fall in a pit.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 
Last edited:

Tumah

Veteran Member
This is only one simple aspect of this massive tapestry; people who assume too much, before actually studying all the intertexuality, is part of the reason many are confused, as people don't study properly.

I'd never have accepted any of these things, and it is based purely on exegesis, as this is what the text stated.
Shall we talk about your translation of "physically seeing"?
Shall we talk about your re-interpretation of "salvation" into a physical entity?

Which is why we have to understand each in ancient Hebraic grammatical contexts, and not in English or using a Latin grammatical system.
A page from a Jewish study Bible:
79282.jpg


No English or Latin included.

The Bible speaks for its self; making this about me isn't the topic.
You are making this about you, but publishing your ...interesting... interpretations.

People who are worthy to be deemed Judah, are those who've accepted the Bible's prophetic statements, those who deny this, are no longer our people...

To explain it simply, we can't claim to be a group of people who praise the Lord (Judah), and then deny the Lord in the same breath.
Such as this.

It is from my grandfathers side, and i don't agree with Rabbinic thinking, that genealogy only comes through the mother.... Yet this is about a Biblical topic; not me.
Of course you don't.

No of course not, our eyes haven't been closed until the last two thousand years; which is where this is seeing, can we open them before we all accidentally fall in a pit.

In my opinion. :innocent:
Ah, the old topic switcheroo. Nice one!
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
Shall we talk about your translation of "physically seeing"?
Why what would you like to add to the dictionaries, and 1308 concordance references?
Shall we talk about your re-interpretation of "salvation" into a physical entity?
It isn't my reinterpretation, as not changing the word salvation into something else; when we take all of the text into account this is what is suggested...

The chief corner stone is literally the Lord coming, as stated in Isaiah 28:21.

It was a physical occurrence in the battles against Ammon, and the red sea.

Then the texts suggests in Isaiah 52:10 (salvation of our God)...Isaiah 52:14 that the Servant will appear as the son of man.

This is only a start to it, there are so many references where derivatives of the word yasha are used to suggest our Lord is our Salvation.
the old topic switcheroo.
If you understood all the contextual applications of what was just said in context of the topic, you'd know that was integrating much of the Tanakh prophecies to come, cross referenced by what Yeshua stated.

To explain that context for you: Our people were cut off by Yeshua (Malachi 4:5-6), where the Curse that Moses stated in Deuteronomy 28, Leviticus 26, was put on us from that point...

Yeshua warns not to follow the blind Pharisees (Matthew 15:14), else we will fall into the pit; which is prophetically about judgement on the whole world to come in Isaiah 24:17-18, where those who do not accept this Snare (Isaiah 8 + Isaiah 28) of recognizing the prophetic fulfillment of the Lord becoming Yeshua will be removed.

The word blindness (H5788) is specifically used by Moses in Deuteronomy 28:28-29, and about Judah in Zechariah 12:4; thus indicating that after Zechariah 11 the 3 foolish shepherds (Pharisees, Sadducees, Levites), then create a worthless shepherd (Rabbinic Leaders), who won't understand this topic we're now discussing...

So no it wasn't a switcheroo; just complex keyword referencing. :)

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
All this argument over who is Yeshua, when the Tanakh told us; yet some people who claim to speak Hebrew, can't read properly in an ancient symbolic language.

H3444 (Yeshua) + H1961 (To become) = Exodus 15:2-3, Psalms 118:14-21, Isaiah 12:2 (2 Samuel 10:11 David Vs Ammon) +5 Verses Isaiah

H3444 (Yeshua) + H7200 (To physically see) = Exodus 14:13, Psalms 98:3, Isaiah 52:10 (2 Chronicles 20:17 Jehoshaphat Vs Ammon)

So the Children of Israel saw the salvation of our God rescue us from the Egyptians (Exodus 14:13), and that the Lord would become our salvation physically (Exodus 15:2-3).

We saw the Lord appear twice in battle, and become our salvation (2 Samuel 10:11 + 2 Chronicles 20:17).

Then David prophesied that the Lord would become the Chief Corner Stone that the Builders reject (Psalms 118:14-21)...

With Isaiah continuing this thread in multiple places that the Lord would become our salvation (Isaiah 12:2), and specifically Isaiah 28:16 if understood properly.

Isaiah 52:10 starts that the Lord will be physically seen as his servant in the form of a son of man (Isaiah 52:14); this is the Lord's Right Arm which the nations will physically see, as related in Psalms 98.

In my opinion. :innocent:


In Isaiah the name El Gibor which conveys in a sense God and in a sense man
 

Kirran

Premium Member
@wizanda, I feel you haven't quite understood that @Tumah actually fluently understands Biblical Hebrew and does some ridiculously huge amount of Torah study.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
I feel you haven't quite understood that @Tumah actually fluently understands Biblical Hebrew and does some ridiculously huge amount of Torah study.
Thank you for the advice, well aware Tumah has an amazing brain, and recall, as often shows every reference of posters on the forum spanning years...

Yet with the Biblical text, as just explaining the Lord has blinded our people to understanding it (Zechariah 12:4); until the Messiah comes and shows them a path they did not know (Isaiah 42:16, Ezekiel 34, Jeremiah 23)...

Since we'd rather mankind not be destroyed, and educate them instead; this forum gives us an opportunity to see if that is possible. :)
do you speak, read and understand Hebrew? How about Aramaic?
I'm not a linguist, terrible at grammar, and have the basics...

Yet I'm adept at computer technology, and so shortcut everything I can't do, by using the technological resources available to all of us... This is to basically show anyone can see this.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

Kirran

Premium Member
Thank you for the advice, well aware Tumah has an amazing brain, and recall, as often shows every reference of posters on the forum spanning years...

Yet with the Biblical text, as just explaining the Lord has blinded our people to understanding it (Zechariah 12:4); until the Messiah comes and shows them a path they did not know (Isaiah 42:16: Ezekiel 34, Jeremiah 23)...

Since we'd rather mankind not be destroyed, and educate them instead; this forum gives us an opportunity to see if that is possible. :)

In my opinion. :innocent:

Dude, I reckon you'd have more foundation trying to convince people of your views from first principles than based on scriptural argument, unless you're prepared to put in enough study to hold your own against scholars of the Torah, and of the New Testament, and the Qur'an, and the Vedas, and a bunch of texts of the Buddhist canon while you're at it.
 
A page from a Jewish study Bible:
79282.jpg


No English or Latin included.

I see the problem. Some of the words near the spine aren't very clear so it's possible all you Hebrews made a mistake. Was probably some pretty important stuff there, maybe about Jesus and Muhammed or the other stuff that tells you you are wrong.

Non-Jews got a better copy and so can read all of the words without guessing. That's probably why the Jewish scribes got a bad reputation due to their low quality facsimiles.

Bonus factoid: the reason the ancients used scrolls instead of books was because they were easier to photocopy/scan.
 

shunyadragon

shunyadragon
Premium Member
All this argument over who is Yeshua, when the Tanakh told us; yet some people who claim to speak Hebrew, can't read properly in an ancient symbolic language.

H3444 (Yeshua) + H1961 (To become) = Exodus 15:2-3, Psalms 118:14-21, Isaiah 12:2 (2 Samuel 10:11 David Vs Ammon) +5 Verses Isaiah

H3444 (Yeshua) + H7200 (To physically see) = Exodus 14:13, Psalms 98:3, Isaiah 52:10 (2 Chronicles 20:17 Jehoshaphat Vs Ammon)

So the Children of Israel saw the salvation of our God rescue us from the Egyptians (Exodus 14:13), and that the Lord would become our salvation physically (Exodus 15:2-3).

We saw the Lord appear twice in battle, and become our salvation (2 Samuel 10:11 + 2 Chronicles 20:17).

Then David prophesied that the Lord would become the Chief Corner Stone that the Builders reject (Psalms 118:14-21)...

With Isaiah continuing this thread in multiple places that the Lord would become our salvation (Isaiah 12:2), and specifically Isaiah 28:16 if understood properly.

Isaiah 52:10 starts that the Lord will be physically seen as his servant in the form of a son of man (Isaiah 52:14); this is the Lord's Right Arm which the nations will physically see, as related in Psalms 98.

In my opinion. :innocent:

I believe it is stupidity to plead for demanding a literal non-Hebrew interpretation of high anecdotal interpretation of the symbolic language from a perspective of an agenda that does not reflect the Hebrew.
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
*some gobbledegook that supposedly supports "stupidity"*
In my opinion. :innocent:
Aren't you all about having been "sent" (the implication being that you were sent by God) to educate people before the supposed coming "tribulation?" Do you really gain any listeners by throwing the word "stupidity" around like that? Just curious... 'cause from the looks of the kinds of responses you get, it's about what I'd expect.

I mean seriously... if God's "on your side" and couldn't help you see this through a little better... whoopsie! If you catch my drift...
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
demanding a literal non-Hebrew interpretation
It isn't 'demanding', it is in a debate forum for discussion...

Plus it isn't a non-Hebrew interpretation, this is what the words actually say, and can post the dictionary references, was giving Strongs numbers for people to look them up.
Do you really gain any listeners by throwing the word "stupidity" around like that?
Unfortunately yes, generally some people only want to interact, when they can show others wrong...

So putting something that causes them to try and overturn it, actually produces better results...

Agree tho, in an enlightened world that makes very little sense, and would be better appealing less directly.
cause from the looks of the kinds of responses you get, it's about what I'd expect.
Would get the same results anyways, here is down near Hell with the mockers and scoffers before the cleansing by fire.
if God's "on your side" and couldn't help you see this through a little better
By all means, if you can figure a better way to word it, with similar contexts to put the point across, always willing to listen to any constructive criticism.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 

A Vestigial Mote

Well-Known Member
Unfortunately yes, generally some people only want to interact, when they can show others wrong...
Showing others wrong isn't definitively a bad thing. When that's more my goal, I usually just try to use at least a smidge more tact than calling them "stupid" right out of the gate.

So putting something that causes them to try and overturn it, actually produces better results...
In my estimation, I do not believe that "more attention" necessarily equates to "better results."

Agree tho, in an enlightened world that makes very little sense, and would be better appealing less directly.
An "enlightened world?" What's that? Is that something like the answer to "Can't we all just get along?"
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
Gotta love the arrogance of "I, the outsider, understand this better than you who aren't the outsider and known way more about it than the average person.":rolleyes:
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
I usually just try to use at least a smidge more tact than calling them "stupid"
Tried to ponder other words, like 'unwise', as it takes wisdom to recall that you've read something multiple times in Hebrew, and they all interconnect...

Pondered 'blinkered', and 'blinded' in someway, as maybe through bad teachers they just ignore the obvious, that exists within the basic language...

Yet inevitably if i missed something so blatant, when i could read the language, I'd call my self stupid...

What other words can you think of?
I do not believe that "more attention" necessarily equates to "better results."
I've lost hope in people's wisdom, find it like being in Hell down here currently, where even basic things are turned into ridicule; it is like being in the film Idiocracy, and then saying be nice to people through wisdom, and watch the results...

If we look at the media, more attention is only given to the negatives, as we're in an age of ungodliness, where the wicked don't even notice.

Yet i get what you're saying in an enlightened world.
An "enlightened world?"
That is Satya Yuga, Messianic Age, the time after Frashokereti...

This current age is about to be removed by force, due to us destroying the planet, and it needing resetting...

Then we keep only the enlightened and wise, who are worthy of being in an age of Godliness.
"I, the outsider, understand this better than you who aren't the outsider and known way more about it than the average person."
Do you get I'm not the outsider, I was the one sent from Heaven with some of the knowledge since birth, and am here to try to bring people into our Age of Godliness...

Fair enough agree my language skills are lacking; yet that doesn't determine the wisdom or knowledge someone has.

In my opinion. :innocent:
 
Top