• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

His Eminence, The Pope.

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I was just wondering about the Pope while starving children are on the streets, that's all
I've already dealt with that in a previous post.

Did you know his shoes cost £300? I cannot help but question what I see. I must.
Actually PF doesn't wear those shoes, plus there's really no way of assessing the value of a pair that most popes have worn on special occasions since they are man-made by a local man in Rome.

No offence meant.
None taken, but please be more specific on what your complaints instead of making blanket condemnations. Trust me, I can and have complained a lot about certain things Catholic, which is one reason why I no longer am.

Take care.
 

JayToka

Member
First - you don't know if they are teaching incorrectly, etc., - so a Pharisee label is just your opinion.



I agree with this, - however, ALL religions have black marks in their histories. For instance the Protestants also murdered people, and took control of governments. Until just recently - the British heir could not marry a Catholic. Look at all the crap in Ireland.

Someone else mentioned the pomp and wealth. Interestingly Tanakh says to give fine cloth for the Priests, and Gold and such to the Temple. The Temple had gold covered tables. The priests wore jewels and gold. This is not new.

*


I really do not know if any religion has borne any fruit, none that I can see anyways. And, yes, gold in temples was a thing, when mankind was tribal and a bit primitive. I'm sure gold could be put to better uses now, instead of adorning priests and tables.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Even if all that you said is absolutely true, I guess that giving an idyllic image of the Vatican is quite exaggerated...given that the recent Vatileaks scandals revealed the money-laundering activities of the IOR, and it has become a fact that Pope Wojtila used mafia money to help Solidarnosc.
And exactly where have I supposedly done as such, plus read my last post above. And yes, I'm well aware of PJPII and Reagan's plot to finance Solidarity, but I'd appreciate any supposed link to them using "mafia money".
 

JayToka

Member
I've already dealt with that in a previous post.

Actually PF doesn't wear those shoes, plus there's really no way of assessing the value of a pair that most popes have worn on special occasions since they are man-made by a local man in Rome.

None taken, but please be more specific on what your complaints instead of making blanket condemnations. Trust me, I can and have complained a lot about certain things Catholic, which is one reason why I no longer am.

Take care.


I just find it bizarre that humans have allowed themselves to be told what to believe. And to believe in the words of a book, written by unknown author/s, over an unknown time period must be the very definition of insanity.
 

Trackdayguy

Speed doesn't kill, it's hitting the wall
First - you don't know if they are teaching incorrectly, etc., - so a Pharisee label is just your opinion.



I agree with this, - however, ALL religions have black marks in their histories. For instance the Protestants also murdered people, and took control of governments. Until just recently - the British heir could not marry a Catholic. Look at all the crap in Ireland.

Someone else mentioned the pomp and wealth. Interestingly Tanakh says to give fine cloth for the Priests, and Gold and such to the Temple. The Temple had gold covered tables. The priests wore jewels and gold. This is not new.

*
I agree
 

savagewind

Veteran Member
Premium Member
A very good read for getting a feel for what the Pope does. Pope John Paul II The Biography by Tad Szulc
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
The Papacy (as absolute monarchy and centralized state) was created because, after the Fall of the Western Roman Empire there was a huge power void, and since Italy was restlessly invaded by foreign peoples, a strong political figure was needed.
Across 1500 years of existence , the power was contended among the most boorish families of the Roman aristocracy, until Rome was occupied and taken by the Italian army. (1870)

so now the presence of the Pope is anachronistic


https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipe...aly_1796_AD-it.png/260px-Italy_1796_AD-it.png

I think it's anachronistic in the same sense monarchy is. Personally, I'd get rid of both, but that view is not particularly common.
As a spokesperson and figurehead they still appear to hold cache.

One thing rarely mentioned around the ascendecy of the Pope (at least here) is the Donation of Constantine.

Interested if any have a take on the impact of that.
 

Woberts

The Perfumed Seneschal
There is something else you need to be the pope............
images
 

Trackdayguy

Speed doesn't kill, it's hitting the wall
Don't be fooled religion is about control and the No 1 weapon that is used by ALL the major religious systems is guilt, fear and shame. For me this isn't about the Catholic Church this is the whole lot, catholic & Protestant both systems have a very checkered past.

If the catholic church for example liquidated its property assets across the world and distributed the wealth to all people it would make millionaires of every person on the planet. So as you can probably gather Im not a big fan of listening to people who are defending a system that's rotten to the core.
 
Last edited:

Jumi

Well-Known Member
Leader of the largest Christian denomination and the second largest religious group overall.
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
I just find it bizarre that humans have allowed themselves to be told what to believe. And to believe in the words of a book, written by unknown author/s, over an unknown time period must be the very definition of insanity.

That is a stupid definition of insanity.

Nothing you've thought of is rarely your own.

Do some people follow mindlessly? Yes of course, but you don't have to be catholic or even religious to do this. No one is immune from this.

You see, what you are failing to grasp is that people are naturally dogmatic........whether it's their own creation or someone else's.

Believing something that is not your own shouldn't even be a point of contention or debate really. Either an argument holds weight or it doesn't.

Your issue may be more with authority, which is another objection entirely.
 

BSM1

What? Me worry?
I just find it bizarre that humans have allowed themselves to be told what to believe. And to believe in the words of a book, written by unknown author/s, over an unknown time period must be the very definition of insanity.

Who wrote the math book you studied in the ninth grade?
 

Quiddity

UndertheInfluenceofGiants
Don't be fooled religion is about control and the No 1 weapon that is used by ALL the major religious systems is guilt, fear and shame. For me this isn't about the Catholic Church this is the whole lot, catholic & Protestant both systems have a very checkered past.

If the catholic church for example liquidated its property assets across the world and distributed the wealth to all people it make millionaires of every person on the planet. So as you can probably gather Im not a big fan of listening to people who are defending a system that's rotten to the core.

Age old objection really. Nonetheless in vogue for sure.

Say I concede your point. That the entire leadership of the RC is rotten to the core. When people defend the RC, what exactly do you think they are defending? The rottenness?
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I just find it bizarre that humans have allowed themselves to be told what to believe. And to believe in the words of a book, written by unknown author/s, over an unknown time period must be the very definition of insanity.
I don't scoff at religions as I do tend to think that most of them at least attempt to understand how we got here and what's moral for us to do. And with your post above, why are you here at Religious Forums if you feel as you do?

As for my approach, maybe read the bottom of my posts to see where I'm coming from, which is not very far at all from what you believe but, instead, I prefer to cloak my approach with plenty of "I don't know" versus judgmentalism based on the delusion of thinking that we do know what "the answers" are.

To put it another way, I'm a scientist, not really a theist, but I don't go around referring to theists as being "insane" because I simply know that I don't have "the final answer".
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
Some in the church, any church, occasionally don't do the right things, and this also includes the apostles if you'd bother to go back and actually read the gospels. And sometimes it also may be a matter of differences of differing opinions as to what should or should not be done.

Should I judge you entirely on the basis of somethings you might have done wrong? Ever hear of "Hate the sin, not the sinner"? All I see from you is hate-filled and highly-bigoted rhetoric while you strut around saying that you're "Embracing the teachings of Christ". Acting and posting in a highly bigoted and judgemental manner is not doing that.

BTW, why have you refused to answer which denomination you are involved with? Maybe by admitting as such we can get a better idea of whom may have poisoned your mind on the RCC, which also happened to me many years ago that I'll cover in a follow-up post.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Can anyone please let me know the job description for the role of the Pope.
- he's head of the College of Bishops.
- he's the bishop of the Archdiocese of Rome (and has all the duties of a diocesian bishop in thay regard)
- he's a priest (and has all the duties of a priest in general in that regard).

Officially, I think that may be it.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I was brought up in a fundamentalist Protestant church that taught the kind of hatred-filled rhetoric and bigotry that I have seen here with some people. I was taught that the pope was the anti-Christ; that Catholics were basically ignorant people who could only blindly follow what the pope and the church taught; that they made up all sorts of teachings that are not found in the Bible; etc. I remember being told to read an anti-Catholic book recommended by the pastor, which I did while still in high school.

And my parents chimed in on this as well, with my own father telling me that if he ever heard that I even visited a Catholic church that he'd kick my "a**". I was also taught that Jews were ignorant since they didn't believe that Jesus was "the messiah", and also that they were corrupt and money-hungry.

Now, imagine my parents' reaction when I decided to marry a very devout Italian Catholic woman-- the same very devout Catholic woman that I have been married to for 51 years now. I heard through my sister that they thought I was so stupid to marry her, and my own father pretty much avoided us when visiting them, sometimes even finding an excuse to leave to work in the garage or whatever. My mother, otoh, was much more reserved.

But something changed all that. Within months, they fell in love with my wife as well since she is so compassionate and loving, plus she doesn't go around bad-mouthing people. When our kids went through their baptism and confirmation services, they came and saw that it's actually a church we go to, not some sort of hell-hole.

Not only did their anti-Catholic bigotry come to an end, so did their anti-Jewish bigotry. When I started going to synagogue and mosque and Hindu services, they didn't object one bit. Matter of fact, not too long before my mother passed away from cancer 25 years ago, she said to me "You sure do get around", and that was said in a complimentary manner that she never would have said a few decades earlier.

Now, maybe some here can understand why my emotions get ramped up when I see any denomination or religion being attacked, and some here at RF who have been around here for several years know that I have responded to attacks on other religions and on many occasions.

In closing, my "theology" is so very liberal that I can walk into any religious service and pretty much feel at home-- with one exception. That exception are those religious institutions that take the "my way or the highway" approach. Yes, they have the full right to having that opinion, including teaching it as such, but I also have the full right of having the opinion of feeling that this is not for me, thus preferring not to to their services if I can avoid them.

shalom
 

Trackdayguy

Speed doesn't kill, it's hitting the wall
Some in the church, any church, occasionally don't do the right things, and this also includes the apostles if you'd bother to go back and actually read the gospels. And sometimes it also may be a matter of differences of differing opinions as to what should or should not be done.

Should I judge you entirely on the basis of somethings you might have done wrong? Ever hear of "Hate the sin, not the sinner"? All I see from you is hate-filled and highly-bigoted rhetoric while you strut around saying that you're "Embracing the teachings of Christ". Acting and posting in a highly bigoted and judgemental manner is not doing that.

BTW, why have you refused to answer which denomination you are involved with? Maybe by admitting as such we can get a better idea of whom may have poisoned your mind on the RCC, which also happened to me many years ago that I'll cover in a follow-up post.

Wow. Actually I left institutional religion 25 years ago. I read a book called "Babylon" My conclusion then and still is today is the Institutional church system has little to do with the teaching of Christ. I therefore have no time for a system I see as corrupt and subjected millions to fear, shame and guilt, why would I want anything to do with it.

You however are obviously finding some value in, good for you and of course are free to defend it which is clearly what all your posts portray.
Good luck
 
Last edited:
Top