the mind has no form. the spirit has no form. a soul, a person, has a form. i'm trying to instill the fact that your term and spirit are not synonymous in esoteric understanding; although they may be in exoteric understanding.Let me start by saying the question I asked could have been answered in its simplest form by one of two words: "yes" or "no"
because a soul is a form, a body, a vehicle. a created thing. a mind isn't. they are distinctly different things. mind is the first cause. form is a result of the cause.Why are you stating this? Have I mentioned ANYTHING about "the body?" No. I have been talking about personality, memory and other mind-related items. Who, on Earth, believes that the self is merely "the body?" This discounts so many things that are supported by the material body, but are not part of its physicality - like personality, emotion, memory, etc.)
a personality comes from the root word personal; which again comes from the root word person. a person is a human. a mind, spirit, isn't necessarily viable human although a human, a person, has a spirit, mind.So, to be clear, since you say it is lost in death, my "personality" is a part of my "body" then, is this what you are saying? But memories aren't according to you? How does this follow in any way, shape or form?
information, mind, isn't created or destroyed. it can change levels of density but no it can't be destroyed. the no-hiding has been experimentally proven as to the idea of conservation of information.And this can be proven by... ?
main memory and stored memory are not the same exact theory. just as you don't hold all the current life experiences in main memory and something can trigger a past experience memory from stored memory. like books we are written in the akashic records. those who can open up enough can retrieve those record written in the etheric body, quantum computer. those memories are entangled with the other minds. those minds that some see as distinctive and separate are actually a collective consciousness.So, when a new life comes into the world, the "mind" it has access to is not new? If it can't have been created for the new being, then it must be somehow getting re-appropriated from another, correct? And if memories are not able to be lost (again, according to you), then why does "mind" not come with all of the memories from it's previous "owner?" And please don't say "sometimes it does" - that is a complete cop out. The fact would be that there would be a great many more of us with past-life memories if memories can't be lost and "mind" is transferred or "tapped into" from one being to the next - without creation of new or destruction of old.
the consciousness, information, mind, spirit becomes a character. joseph campbell relates it as a hero with a thousand faces. we wear a mask. we simply take that mask off at death and put it on at birth. in fact we play many roles in the third density experience. we wear many hats. we wear many masks.Within what I believe, you are "Fool" at this moment... and this moment only, whatever moment that is/happens to be. A moment from now you are "Fool" in that moment. Each moment that passes is gone, each moment yet to be is just that... yet to be. Like the rest of us, you inhabit a 1-dimensional slice of reality with respect to time. Which is a point. you don't get a line... definitely don't get anything 3-dimensional. Even if time were somehow relative to one being vs. another, an exact state of the universe within a given subset of time is what it is, and no more.
take off the mask. what is left? fool came into being as a human on this planetary experience in space/time. in a higher dimension the mind isn't limited to space or time. infinite, eternal, things are limited to space/time. they are formless and no definitive place in higher dimensions. it transcends space and time constraint, what is called entanglement.. in the next appearance what role will the mind take?
in this lifetime, what experience will the mind take? when asleep what dimension does the mind exist in when dreaming? the mind doesn't operate under third density limitations.
some have become attached to preservation of the form at the expense of the mind. what happens if self loses control of self; while trying to save the soul, the chemical body? **** happens.Then the original unanswered question stands - why care about the fate of the soul?
other things have mind and they don't have a form like the personality. they too are souls.There are plenty of things we all have in common besides having a "mind", and in much the same way, with as little variance as you propose this "mind" (I have to admit I do not agree with you on this - I believe that each person has their own "mind" that belongs exclusively to and can and will only ever be accessible to each individual themselves) has between us. For example, we share the sun and the energy it produces that fuels life on our planet. Our relative distances and effectiveness of its heat/energy that we see in our locale on Earth may vary, sure - but this is no difference than the expression of "mind" that you propose takes on 1000s of languages, cultures, ethnicities, etc. We also all have the need to expel waste of various types. Point being - why choose "mind" and give it supernatural significance over any of the other thousands of things we all share?
the mind isn't supernatural. it is nature realized, actualized.
the mind creates and the spirit moves and the created is realized. who builds a house without a blue print? who constructs a blue print without mind?
mindless is without sense. senses are needed in this nature. the mind has many ways of taking in information about other things and has the ability to create many expressions of sensory things.
it works the same way at the macrocosm as it does the microcosm. as above; so below.