You're equivocating over a point that doesnt change the validity of my conclusion. Replace "money" with "mammon" in my sentence and my point stands unchanged and unchallenged, because I used the terms interchangeably in that sentence (and I agree they are technically different, but that distinction is not relevant to my point).
My point was that you took those scriptures out of context by implying they were revelant to the original question. But they arent, as your own defintion of capitalism proves.
As I already said, you may be stating what you believe about capitalism's relationship to Christianity, but what you are not doing with your statement, as you have yet to do in any of your statements, is disprove my challenge to you by demonstrating why your first two uses of scripture are actually relevant to the question you posed.
You will not be able to do that, by your own defintion of capitalism, because those two verses have absolutely nothing to do with capitalism unless you change your defintion of capitalism to inherently involve theft and serving mammon rather than God.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt by assuming your scriptures were intended to be revelant to your question. So either your definiton of capitalism was wrong, or you sloppily misused the scriptures and didnt realize that they had no logical connection to your question.
actually i could use the whole bible to show that capitalism isn't advocated. it wasn't expedient to post all the examples on wealth and selfishness in the original post.
Matthew 23:25
“Woe to you, teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You clean the outside of the cup and dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence.
unfortunately language isn't precise.
https://www.cut-the-knot.org/language/parrot.shtml
it's called a dumb parrot puzzle. unless you wish to claim friends are a type of capital, you can't be a capitalist and a friend at the some moment. capitalism isn't mutually beneficial to ALL.
capitalism generally is a selfish act in order to gain something for self in interest and at a disadvantage to another.