• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

False Prophets

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
That's nonsense and you know it. Please show us where anyone has threatened anyone with such a thing on here or anywhere else for that matter.
I don't want to turn this into yet another anti-Islam thread, but there is only one religion that does not take kindly to anything approaching criticism - especially against its prophet.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Do you mean there are no prophets because there are no prophecies?
Sure there are. They usually come from Cambridge, Oxford, MIT, NASA, CERN etc. Look at just how many prophecies (eclipses, Higgs boson, gravity waves, global warming) we have got right. No Prophet of the past can even hold a matchstick to us scientists. :smilingimp:
 

Muslim-UK

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I don't want to turn this into yet another anti-Islam thread, but there is only one religion that does not take kindly to anything approaching criticism - especially against its prophet.
Criticism is welcome, but over stepping the mark and attempting to vilify ANY of the prophets of GOD should be met with a firm, no nonsense response.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Criticism is welcome, but over stepping the mark and attempting to vilify ANY of the prophets of GOD should be met with a firm, no nonsense response.
One would think that enlightened spiritual beings, with their direct connection to god, would be far more understanding and would just look at the naysayers and smile, roll their eyes, and continue on about their day.
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I don't want to turn this into yet another anti-Islam thread, but there is only one religion that does not take kindly to anything approaching criticism - especially against its prophet.

I could make a joke about the Jews killing all the first born sons of Egypt for not taking Moses seriously, but I think that might make everyone uncomfortable.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
I could make a joke about the Jews killing all the first born sons of Egypt for not taking Moses seriously, but I think that might make everyone uncomfortable.
Could have sworn that that was god and not the Jews.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
I could make a joke about the Jews killing all the first born sons of Egypt for not taking Moses seriously, but I think that might make everyone uncomfortable.
Factual correction:- Jews did not kill them. Their God supposedly did. Though it's a made up story of a little nation getting punched left and right by Assyria and Egypt and venting their frustration in mythological form. Every mouse fantasies about belling the cat after all. Poor mouse.
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Violence is never the answer. The Prophet pbuh would correct such people and if they persisted would simply walk away.
By the way, you straightaway thought I was talking only about Muslims. I was not. In the 20th century several such prophets with their fanatical followers have arisen... Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol pot, Kim Jong Un and also ISIS, Taliban. I was thinking of all the poor folks who were, are and will continue to be in their mercy.
 

columbus

yawn <ignore> yawn
By the way, you straightaway thought I was talking only about Muslims. I was not. In the 20th century several such prophets with their fanatical followers have arisen... Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Pol pot, Kim Jong Un and also ISIS, Taliban. I was thinking of all the poor folks who were, are and will continue to be in their mercy.
Nor is it limited to Communists and Islamicists. Recent USA history is rife with self-described "spokesmen for God"(of the Christian flavor) advocating violence. From the assassination of Chavez to the invasion of Iraq, from Capital Punishment to beefing up the militarization of the police, it's just endless.
Tom
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Could have sworn that that was god and not the Jews.

It was the Jewish God. The same guy who wouldn't fix the plumbing for forty days and forty nights even if everyone drowned and outsources the job of saving life on earth to Noah and his three sons by getting them to build an ark to show his benevolence.

You have to admit, that is someone with strange priorities. o_O

Factual correction:- Jews did not kill them. Their God supposedly did. Though it's a made up story of a little nation getting punched left and right by Assyria and Egypt and venting their frustration in mythological form. Every mouse fantasies about belling the cat after all. Poor mouse.

My point (which made me uncomfortable) was along the lines that if it was Allah who killed the first born in Egypt we'd be saying its representative of how Islam is an evil religion and how Muslims are evil for worshipping an evil god and not listening to their conscience. We wouldn't think twice about drawing a distinction between Muhammad, Allah and Muslims. We'd probably call anyone who did "Islam apologists" trying to protect "religious moderates" for worshipping an evil/false religion. But after two thousands years of abuse to the point of extermination, we lay off the Jews.

Reduce it down to school playground stuff, we feel guilty for bullying the orphan kid who lost his parents to the nazis but we'll quite happily kick the crap out of that kid whose mum wears full body covering because we think she's weird and oppressed even if she chose to wear it. All this, even though they worship potentially the same god. I don't know if thats the case but it just makes it all very absurd. :shrug:
 

sayak83

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
It was the Jewish God. The same guy who wouldn't fix the plumbing for forty days and forty nights even if everyone drowned and outsources the job of saving life on earth to Noah and his three sons by getting them to build an ark to show his benevolence.

You have to admit, that is someone with strange priorities. o_O



My point (which made me uncomfortable) was along the lines that if it was Allah who killed the first born in Egypt we'd be saying its representative of how Islam is an evil religion and how Muslims are evil for worshipping an evil god and not listening to their conscience. We wouldn't think twice about drawing a distinction between Muhammad, Allah and Muslims. We'd probably call anyone who did "Islam apologists" trying to protect "religious moderates" for worshipping an evil/false religion. But after two thousands years of abuse to the point of extermination, we lay off the Jews.

Reduce it down to school playground stuff, we feel guilty for bullying the orphan kid who lost his parents to the nazis but we'll quite happily kick the crap out of that kid whose mum wears full body covering because we think she's weird and oppressed even if she chose to wear it. All this, even though they worship potentially the same god. I don't know if thats the case but it just makes it all very absurd. :shrug:
Of course criticism should be fair.
 

Akivah

Well-Known Member
I'm wondering how people try to distinguish between "true" prophets and "false" prophets. If someone walks down the street claiming to be a prophet for a religion (admittedly unlikely) you have to figure out whether you can take them at their word or whether you just move on trying to avoid making eye contact with the crazy person.

Do you think this is a reasonable view? Or is there something missing?
What's missing is the proper definition of the word 'prophet'. I know that Judaism and Christianity have different definitions of the word, so I'd assume that other religions have their own definition.

The Torah tells us that we can identify a false prophet if the person encourages us to worship foreign gods or idols, or tells us stuff that contradicts the Tanakh.
 

Akivah

Well-Known Member
You can contact the jinn who have the ability to use wormholes and other methods to glimpse into the future, that information relayed to a earthly human 'prophet' is worth nothing if they are not preaching worship of GOD alone, and testifying to the truthfulness of ALL the previous Prophets along with previous Scriptures.

Do you know of any Prophets post mid 7th Century who fit the bill? I certainly don't.

I can't even think of any person that fit the bill after the pre 1st Century.
 

Laika

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
What's missing is the proper definition of the word 'prophet'. I know that Judaism and Christianity have different definitions of the word, so I'd assume that other religions have their own definition.

The Torah tells us that we can identify a false prophet if the person encourages us to worship foreign gods or idols, or tells us stuff that contradicts the Tanakh.

Yeah. I didn't take that into account when I wrote the OP as I forgot this is an internet forum and no-one uses the same definition. :D

I can't even think of any person that fit the bill after the pre 1st Century.

Not sure, but maybe Zoroaster as the founder of an early Monotheistic religion (Zoroastrianism)? He might be worth a look for his influence on Jewish traditions (and therefore Abrahamic religions).
 

Sleeppy

Fatalist. Christian. Pacifist.
All prophets are false/faulty, where possible.

The first are last and the last first. Your children are your prophets, and you are theirs.
 
Top