And why should anyone believe that you understand "[t]he real intent of the first chapters of Genesis"?
See the first post.
And why should anyone believe that you understand "[t]he real intent of the first chapters of Genesis"?
See post #1, #53, and #58.
The real question is, are these relationships I have shown between verses coincidental or simply by chance. An example would be,
Genesis 7: (14-15) 14 They, and every beast
after his kind, and all the cattle
after their kind, and every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind, and every fowl
after his kind, every bird of every sort. 15 And they went in unto Noah into the ark, two and two of all flesh,
wherein is the breath of life.
Are the distinctions between those "after their kind" and "wherein is the breath of life" getting on the ark from each creation? We see the same language in both Genesis creation accounts.
Genesis 1:25 And God made the beast of the earth
after his kind, and cattle
after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
and
Genesis 2:7 And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and
breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
The distinction of each creation getting on the ark is significant.
To answer your question, I have many more Biblical connections to show they are two different creations.