• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Divinity of Christ

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
(quote)

Hi Ken
Do you believe that the scriptures that you have quoted have already come to pass, or do you think that they are yet to be fulfilled ? Did I accurately understand your post to say that you are of the opinion that it has already been fulfilled? (please clarify, if you will-- I could be wrong...)

No, what I was quoting was just to demonstrate that there are portions that are not symbolic. Those specific quotes are yet to come but they aren't symbolic.

Rev. 2:
1 “To the angelof the church in Ephesus write: These are the words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands.
2 I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false.

Do you think these were future tense or present?

Since John was given the vision and recorded it while he was literally on the Isle of Patmos, in prison, he could not have literally 'seen' with human eyes the things in the heavenly realm, as there are no human fleshly bodies in the heavens, according to the scripture at 1 Corinthians 15:50. And we know, do we not, that humans cannot see spirit creatures with the normal human eyesight?
That is correct. The gift of "discerning of spirits" is what gives man the capacity to look into the spiritual realm. But it is quite real :D

As I understand it, 'a vision' is something seen other than via natural sight -- a prophetic sight, in this case, from God, of things that have not yet happened. Would you agree?
Yes and no. A vision can be in the future but it could also be something in the past or even present. For an example, when Jesus said "John 1:48 “How do you know me?” Nathanael asked. Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.” The vision of seeing Nathanael under the fig tree was present and not future.

IMHO, many Bible prophecies spoken and written down via inspiration from God are yet to come to pass. So, I would have to respectfully disagree with the idea that those things have already come to pass in reality. I believe the 'vision' is yet to be fulfilled. Very soon, however...

Agreed! :) Those quoted before are yet to come... but very soon!

What do you think of the association of the scriptural passages depicting the Heavenly Kingdom of God as a ruling authority set to rule over the entire earth "at the appointed time" (Daniel 2:44) with the model prayer that Jesus taught to His disciples at Matthew 6:9-10?
Thanks for your kind consideration

peace to you

LOL... before I answer... are we getting to big in scope? That sounds like a whole thread line in and of itself.

I hope you had a great Sabbath.
 

Daisies4me

Active Member
No, what I was quoting was just to demonstrate that there are portions that are not symbolic. Those specific quotes are yet to come but they aren't symbolic.

Rev. 2:
1 “To the angelof the church in Ephesus write: These are the words of him who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands.
2 I know your deeds, your hard work and your perseverance. I know that you cannot tolerate wicked people, that you have tested those who claim to be apostles but are not, and have found them false.

Do you think these were future tense or present?


That is correct. The gift of "discerning of spirits" is what gives man the capacity to look into the spiritual realm. But it is quite real :D


Yes and no. A vision can be in the future but it could also be something in the past or even present. For an example, when Jesus said "John 1:48 “How do you know me?” Nathanael asked. Jesus answered, “I saw you while you were still under the fig tree before Philip called you.” The vision of seeing Nathanael under the fig tree was present and not future.



Agreed! :) Those quoted before are yet to come... but very soon!



LOL... before I answer... are we getting to big in scope? That sounds like a whole thread line in and of itself.

(quote)

hi
:) , yes, I fear that you are indeed correct, we have
(or maybe I have) certainly carried on much, and the scope has indeed grown into many directions and perhaps grown into a life of its own.. -smile-

However, one last comment if you will, concerning your query about the scripture at Rev. 2. -- I believe that to be symbolism, but the things depicted are very real, and pertinent to accurate understanding of the vision. Or, as stated at Rev. 1:1. "written in signs". It has great meaning, such as the identity of "He" who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands...

In my understanding, each of these 'symbols' have great meaning in the prophecy as discerned by some even today.

Things that were only to be understood when the vision is becoming manifest in the time frame it is intended, which is during the 'final part of the days', {or, as it says at Rev. 1:10, that 'by inspiration I came to be in the Lord's
day' }
There is a time that God has purposed , when things previously hidden from human understanding, (example Daniel's vision) will be exposed by 'the light of truth' {Proverbs 4:18}, and Daniel 12:4 , explaining that Daniel nor any others understood what he wrote at the time of his writing it under Inspiration. Yes?

Thanks for the great conversation and exchange of ideas, and for your kind patience.

May you have peace

(quote)
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
hi
:) , yes, I fear that you are indeed correct, we have
(or maybe I have) certainly carried on much, and the scope has indeed grown into many directions and perhaps grown into a life of its own.. -smile-

But I love the whole process. Thank you. (And have no problem answering the question if you like for it seems we are closing this one)

However, one last comment if you will, concerning your query about the scripture at Rev. 2. -- I believe that to be symbolism, but the things depicted are very real, and pertinent to accurate understanding of the vision. Or, as stated at Rev. 1:1. "written in signs". It has great meaning, such as the identity of "He" who holds the seven stars in his right hand and walks among the seven golden lampstands...

In my understanding, each of these 'symbols' have great meaning in the prophecy as discerned by some even today.
But when it said, "To the church... I know your works"... is that symbolism or reality of the moment!

Things that were only to be understood when the vision is becoming manifest in the time frame it is intended, which is during the 'final part of the days', {or, as it says at Rev. 1:10, that 'by inspiration I came to be in the Lord's
day' }

There is a time that God has purposed , when things previously hidden from human understanding, (example Daniel's vision) will be exposed by 'the light of truth' {Proverbs 4:18}, and Daniel 12:4 , explaining that Daniel nor any others understood what he wrote at the time of his writing it under Inspiration. Yes?

Thanks for the great conversation and exchange of ideas, and for your kind patience.

The reason I suggest that is for the following in Rev 1:19 “Write, therefore, what you have seen, what is now and what will take place later." (emphasis mine)

Although I agree completely with your statements of its prophetic nature and symbolism, there are parts which addresses the "now". On those VERY FEW moments about "now", there is no symbolism. IMHO

May you have peace
Thank you!! I receive the peace at the age of 28 from my Prince of Peace. :)

May God fill your life with His presence.
 

Daisies4me

Active Member
But I love the whole process. Thank you. (And have no problem answering the question if you like for it seems we are closing this one)


But when it said, "To the church... I know your works"... is that symbolism or reality of the moment


The reason I suggest that is for the following in Rev 1:19 “Write, therefore, what you have seen, what is now and what will take place later." (emphasis mine)

Although I agree completely with your statements of its prophetic nature and symbolism, there are parts which addresses the "now". On those VERY FEW moments about "now", there is no symbolism. IMHO


Thank you!! I receive the peace at the age of 28 from my Prince of Peace. :)

May God fill your life with His presence.

(quote)

Good morning, Ken
thanks for your reply, and for the kind interaction and exchange of beliefs and ideas. Always a pleasure.
take good care

(quote)
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
What if Jesus was God, and there is no son of God? If that is true, then God came into the world to give testimony to Jews (his chosen people). Also, God (Jesus) did not intend to start a new religion. God doesn't micro-manage. Followers of Jesus came up with narrative stories that changed Jews perception of Jesus. If you read those gospels written prior to the NT gospels you don't find those narrative stories (Jesus is the son of God, Jesus is tempted by the devil, John baptizes Jesus, Jesus drives out devils, Jesus heals many, Jesus walks on water, etc.). Apparently, those stories were added to gain support for the Jesus movement. Here is an excellent source for those ideas, The Lost Gospel Q by Burton L. Mack. I believe Revelation 11 about the two witnesses (God's duality) is the best story about Jesus.

I believe in dealing with facts not fantasies.

I believe a new covenant qualifies as a new religion.

I believe this qualifies:
Mat 6:30 But if God doth so clothe the grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?

I believe you are reverting to fantasy again.

I don't believe in reading false gospels.
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
(quote)

Hi
I will say that at one time, I agreed with you. Lots of examining of the Scriptures have changed my mind, however. I am now of the mind that Jesus is precisely who he said he was, when he said "I am God's Son".--John 10:36.
I do understand why many people can be so easily misled on the matter, however. Or, many simply choose to believe a certain way because it satisfies a need they have, or others don't want to be considered an 'outcast' from family or church friends. Many reasons why some people stick to their beliefs.
"inquiring minds" sometimes aren't satisfied with a 'go with the flow' way of thinking.... :)

take care

(quote)

I believe if you had understood what you examined then you should have seen that Jesus is God in the flesh.

I believe one may not hang a theology on one scripture. Of course Jesus is precisely God's son but He is not primarily or solitarily God's son.

I believe you should since you qualify but I believe what the Bible says whether my pastor thinks so or not. Why do you think there are so monay people who get the same message from reading the Bible? Do you think they are all misled?
 

Muffled

Jesus in me
As for who Jesus was. I believe he was God, not the son of God. Then, knowing God is a duality, there is no Trinity, just the Duality of God.

I believe you are dense. You keep repeating the same inanities as though they could be proven but the truth is you can't prove them.

Jesus is God because He says He is one with the Father. Jesus is the Son of God because He is a creation of God in the womb. The Paraclete is quite real and Biblically based and is God also.
 

Daisies4me

Active Member
I believe if you had understood what you examined then you should have seen that Jesus is God in the flesh.

I believe one may not hang a theology on one scripture. Of course Jesus is precisely God's son but He is not primarily or solitarily God's son.

I believe you should since you qualify but I believe what the Bible says whether my pastor thinks so or not. Why do you think there are so monay people who get the same message from reading the Bible? Do you think they are all misled?

(quote)

Hi

Luke 1:31-32

enjoy

(quote)
 

Repox

Truth Seeker
I believe in dealing with facts not fantasies.

I believe a new covenant qualifies as a new religion.

I believe this qualifies:

Mat 6:30 But if God doth so clothe the grass of the field, which to-day is, and to-morrow is cast into the oven, shall he not much more clothe you, O ye of little faith?

I believe you are reverting to fantasy again.

I don't believe in reading false gospels.
It is not my fault that hardly anyone does research. Whatever ancient church leaders said has become the "word of God." You know of course there are thousands of religions, holy books, etc. What is truth. I have proposed my case based on scholarly research, you prefer to accept questionable references. You should read church history. There were many gospels until church leaders decided what was "holy." How do you determine who is holy? There are about 38,000 religions in the US. Which one is correct, or holy?
 

Repox

Truth Seeker
I believe you are dense. You keep repeating the same inanities as though they could be proven but the truth is you can't prove them.

Jesus is God because He says He is one with the Father. Jesus is the Son of God because He is a creation of God in the womb. The Paraclete is quite real and Biblically based and is God also.
There is no son of God. Jesus was God, and God is a duality. That means there is no Trinity. If God is eternal, how could he have a son. It would mean God is not eternal, or stopped being eternal when he had a son. What nonsense!
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
There is no son of God. Jesus was God, and God is a duality. That means there is no Trinity. If God is eternal, how could he have a son. It would mean God is not eternal, or stopped being eternal when he had a son. What nonsense!
We will have to agree to disagree on this one.

There are about 38,000 religions in the US.

Now we can make it 38,001! :D And you are a great example on how that happens. ;)
 

Repox

Truth Seeker
We will have to agree to disagree on this one.



Now we can make it 38,001! :D And you are a great example on how that happens. ;)
No, I don't want to start a new religion. The only religion for God is the one He started, Judaism.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
No, I don't want to start a new religion. The only religion for God is the one He started, Judaism.

Won't hear me disagreeing... but strict Judaism will call dualism number 38001
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
Okay, the Judaism originally proposed by God, but revised by His chosen people. Most likely, we will never know.
Well, if there is a resurrection, we will find out for sure. :)
 

Daisies4me

Active Member
It is not my fault that hardly anyone does research. Whatever ancient church leaders said has become the "word of God." You know of course there are thousands of religions, holy books, etc. What is truth. I have proposed my case based on scholarly research, you prefer to accept questionable references. You should read church history. There were many gospels until church leaders decided what was "holy." How do you determine who is holy? There are about 38,000 religions in the US. Which one is correct, or holy?

(quote)

hello, repox

I notice that you say that you believe every new covenant forms a new religion. is that right?

I see in the Bible that there are several covenants, like the Edenic covenant, the Abrahamic covenant, the Law Covenant, the Davidic Covenant, the new covenant, etc....

are they all 'new religions'? or agreements made between God and men over time, to advance the fulfillment of God's purposes for the earth and mankind?

Just curious on your opinion on the matter.

Peace to you
(quote)
 

Repox

Truth Seeker
(quote)

hello, repox

I notice that you say that you believe every new covenant forms a new religion. is that right?

I see in the Bible that there are several covenants, like the Edenic covenant, the Abrahamic covenant, the Law Covenant, the Davidic Covenant, the new covenant, etc....

are they all 'new religions'? or agreements made between God and men over time, to advance the fulfillment of God's purposes for the earth and mankind?

Just curious on your opinion on the matter.

Peace to you
(quote)
Very good question. I think there has only been one covenant, it was with the Jews. God made promises, but his chosen people didn't obey His commandments. Subsequently, we have had different religious interpretations of God's word, one new religion after another. Part of the problem for humans may be God has not been involved in new religions, or religious movements. In some ways, Israel has been a surrogate for humankind. They have not fulfilled their purpose insofar as God's Commandments have not been obeyed.
 

Daisies4me

Active Member
Very good question. I think there has only been one covenant, it was with the Jews. God made promises, but his chosen people didn't obey His commandments. Subsequently, we have had different religious interpretations of God's word, one new religion after another. Part of the problem for humans may be God has not been involved in new religions, or religious movements. In some ways, Israel has been a surrogate for humankind. They have not fulfilled their purpose insofar as God's Commandments have not been obeyed.

(quote)

Hi
Thanks for your response.
Might I ask which of the translations of the Inspired Holy Scriptures from God is your prefered religious study book?

What is your opinion of the Dead Sea Scroll of Isaiah, that was found in 1947 in a cave in Qumran? Would you accept that as a part of the Holy Writings Inspired of God?

thanks,
(quote)
 

Repox

Truth Seeker
(quote)

Hi
Thanks for your response.
Might I ask which of the translations of the Inspired Holy Scriptures from God is your prefered religious study book?

What is your opinion of the Dead Sea Scroll of Isaiah, that was found in 1947 in a cave in Qumran? Would you accept that as a part of the Holy Writings Inspired of God?

thanks,
(quote)
(quote)

Hi
Thanks for your response.
Might I ask which of the translations of the Inspired Holy Scriptures from God is your prefered religious study book?

What is your opinion of the Dead Sea Scroll of Isaiah, that was found in 1947 in a cave in Qumran? Would you accept that as a part of the Holy Writings Inspired of God?

thanks,
(quote)
I prefer the first few books of the Old Testament (Torah). I believe Isaiah is one of God's holy books. The more original the holy book the more authentic it is. I don't believe God approves of so many revisions or amendments to His Commandments or edicts. I don't trust humans to supplement or reinterpret God's holy word.
 
Top